Skip to content

· Private foundation

Madsen Family Foundation

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2018
19
Grants FY2018
6
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Health$29kHuman Services$9kEducation$4kReligion$3kHousing & Shelter$2kEmployment$1kArts & Culture$600Youth Development$500Other$0
02FY2018 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
6
States reached
$724k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Cure Alzheimer's Fund$3,000
Alzheimer's Association$3,000
Fisher Ctr for Alzheimer's Research$3,000
Pathways$2,500
Weill Cornell Medical College$2,500
Avenidas$2,500
Little Brothers of the Elderly$2,000
Zen Hospice Project$1,500
Rebuilding Together$1,000
Our Daily BreadRBC Ministries$500
Partners In Health$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Wellspring$500
Girls To Women$500
Delancey Street Foundation$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Avenidas: $3k → 8%Avenidas: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$42k · 15 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
4

Total granted

$42k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+15%

Still filing today

53%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
HealthReligionEducationHuman ServicesEmploymentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $6k · revenue +40%
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $6k · revenue +224%
  • W
    WELLSPRING
    2× · 2017–2018 · $1k · revenue +214%

Funded once

  • BU
    BIOLA UNIVERSITY INC
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +15%
  • TB
    The Berkeley School
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue -9%
  • WR
    Women's Recovery Association
    one grant, 2017 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
2
Western University of Health Sciences

To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.

—
3
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
4
The Scripps Research Institute

The scripps research institute ("tsri") performs high impact basic biomedical research, improves the human condition by fostering translation of its discoveries into useful products and engages in the highest quality graduate scientific…

Health
5
California Baptist University

A private institution of higher education, offering both undergraduate and graduate courses to students.

Education
6
Sage Hill School

We inspire in our students a love of knowledge and the ability to use that knowledge creatively, compassionately and courageously throughout their lives.sage hill school's commitment to academic excellence and our outstanding college…

Education
7
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
8
Claremont Graduate University

Claremont Graduate University prepares individuals to be leaders for positive change in the world. Unique in its transdisciplinary approach, the University is dedicated to the creation, dissemination, and application of new knowledge and…

Education
9
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
10
Pomona College

Throughout its history, pomona college has educated men and women of exceptional promise. we gather individuals, regardless of financial circumstances, into a small residential community that is strongly rooted in southern california yet…

Education
11
Pacific School of Religion

Pacific school of religion prepares a diverse cadre of spiritually rooted leaders with the vision, resilience, and skill to create a world where all can thrive. grounded in the rigorous study and faithful practice of progressive christian…

Education
12
California Institute for BioMedical Research

Our mission is to build a unique institute that bridges basic research and drug discovery, and that attracts the best and brightest scientists, physicians and students to work together synergistically to find cures for neglected human…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Zen Hospice Project Dba Zen Caregiving Project; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Fisher Ctr for Alzheimer's Research: $6,000 · OtherFisher Ctr for Alzheimer's ResearchPathways: $5,000 · OtherPathwaysLittle Brothers of the Elderly: $4,000 · OtherLittle Brothers of the ElderlyZEN HOSPICE PROJECT DBA ZEN CAREGIVING PROJECT: $2,800 · OtherZEN HOSPICE PROJECT DBA ZEN CAREGIVING PROJECTWeill Cornell Medical College: $2,500 · OtherWeill Cornell Medical CollegeRebuilding Together: $2,000 · OtherRebuilding Together+5 more: $2,700 · Other+5 moreALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $6,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATE…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $6,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH…PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $500 · HealthAVENIDAS: $5,000 · Human ServicesAVENIDASBIOLA UNIVERSITY INC: $3,000 · EducationGIRLS TO WOMEN: $500 · EducationWELLSPRING: $1,000 · ReligionRBC MINISTRIES: $500 · ReligionHOPE HORIZON EAST PALO ALTO: $500 · ReligionDELANCEY STREET CALIFORNIA: $1,000 · EmploymentCRANDELL THEATRE INC: $600 · Arts & CultureYOSEMITE FOUNDATION: $400 · Recreation & Sports
Other$25,000Health$12,500Human Services$5,000Education$3,500Religion$2,000Employment$1,000Arts & Culture$600Recreation & Sports$400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAVENIDAS: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIOLA UNIVERSITY INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZEN HOSPICE PROJECT DBA ZEN CAREGIVING PROJECT: $2,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDELANCEY STREET CALIFORNIA: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWELLSPRING: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCRANDELL THEATRE INC: $600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Berkeley School: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRBC MINISTRIES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS TO WOMEN: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE HORIZON EAST PALO ALTO: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOSEMITE FOUNDATION: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA15.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Madsen Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Madsen Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Madsen Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Madsen Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Madsen Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph