Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-Trustees

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$472k
Granted FY2024still arriving
43
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0165% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Human Services$988kArts & Culture$388kEducation$160kEnvironment$156kHealth$99kYouth Development$96kHousing & Shelter$54kRecreation & Sports$48kAnimals$23kOther$1.2M
02FY2024 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k21 grants · $130k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $242k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW HAMPSHIRE CATHOLIC CHARITIES$100,000
RIVERBEND COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH$15,000
OPERATION DELTA DOG$15,000
WEBSTER HOUSE CHILDREN'S HOME$15,000
THE FRONT DOOR AGENCY$15,000
SOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FORESTS$15,000
MONT VERNON LIBRARY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$12,500
LAND FOR GOOD$12,089
THE ANDOVER COMMUNITY HUB$11,000
BELKNAP HOUSE$11,000
NASHUA SOUP KITCHEN & SHELTER INC$10,660
NEW HAMPSHIRE LAKES ASSOCIATION INC$10,000
FRIENDS OF CENTENNIAL HALL INC$10,000
TAPROOT FARM & ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION CENTER$10,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SOUHEGAN VALLEY INC$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $959k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 12% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WILLING HANDS ENTERPRISE: $10k → 9%ORGANIZATION FOR REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SUCCESS: $15k → 7%TURNING POINTS NETWORK: $14k → 10%BELKNAP HOUSE: $11k → 9%BELKNAP HOUSE: $10k → 9%ORGANIZATION FOR REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SUCCESS: $8k → 7%PENACOOK ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY INC: $13k → 7%PENACOOK ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY INC: $13k → 7%COMMUNITY CAREGIVERS OF GREATER DERRY: $10k → 5%GRAFTON COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL INC: $9k → 10%SEEDS OF FAITH INC: $15k → 9%GRAFTON COUNTY SENIOR CITIZEN'S COUNCIL: $9k → 10%SEEDS OF FAITH INC DBA LYDIA'S HOUSE OF HOPE: $15k → 9%NEW HAMPSHIRE CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $100k → 7%NEW HAMPSHIRE CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $100k → 7%NEW HAMPSHIRE CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $100k → 7%GIBSON CENTER FOR SENIOR SERVICES: $16k → 9%NEW HAMPSHIRE CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $100k → 7%GIBSON CENTER FOR SENIOR SERVICES INC: $9k → 9%NEW HAMPSHIRE CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $100k → 7%THE CHASE HOUSE: $10k → 5%SEACOAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $5k → 5%FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CONCORD: $8k → 7%FRIENDS OF FORGOTTEN CHILDREN: $8k → 7%CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES OF NH: $5k → 7%THE FRONT DOOR AGENCY: $15k → 7%FRONT DOOR AGENCY: $10k → 7%FRONT DOOR AGENCY: $5k → 7%THE GRAPEVINE FAMILY & COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $7k → 7%THE RIVER CENTER: $10k → 7%WEBSTER HOUSE CHILDREN'S HOME: $25k → 7%THE WEBSTER HOUSE: $15k → 7%WEBSTER HOUSE CHILDREN'S HOME: $15k → 7%THE WEBSTER HOUSE: $15k → 7%WEBSTER HOUSE THE: $10k → 7%THE RIVER CENTER: $5k → 7%MOORE CENTER THE: $25k → 7%MONADNOCK WORKSOURCE INC: $5k → 7%THE WEBSTER HOUSE: $5k → 7%WEBSTER HOUSE THE: $5k → 7%MOORE CENTER SERVICE INC: $7k → 7%STEPPING STONES: $20k → 7%MARGUERITE'S PLACE INC: $9k → 7%FAMILY PROMISE OF SOUTHERN NEW HAMPSHIRE: $6k → 7%FAMILY PROMISE OF SOUTHERN NH: $6k → 7%MARGUERITE'S PLACE INC: $5k → 7%MARGUERITE'S PLACE INC: $5k → 7%YMCA OF GREATER NASHUA: $15k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.0M · 56 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

56 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2024, 34 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

56
124

Total granted

$2.0M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+26%

Still filing today

91%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $192k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentEducationHealthHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NH
    New Hampshire Catholic Charities
    5× · 2020–2024 · $500k · revenue +14%
  • WH
    WEBSTER HOUSE
    7× · 2017–2024 · $90k · revenue +68%
  • GI
    GIRLS INCORPORATED OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
    4× · 2019–2024 · $38k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • TV
    The Visiting Nurse Association Of Franklingraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +76%
  • TG
    The Granite Young Men's Christian Associationgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +59%
  • TM
    THE MOVING COMPANY DANCE CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -74%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bank of New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Center Meeting House of Newbury Nh Inc

Restore and maintain the 1832 Meetinghouse located in the center of Newbury,NH

Arts & Culture
3
Piscataquog Land Conservancy

The Piscataquog Land Conservancy is a nonprofit land conservation organization founded in 1970. Its purpose is to conserve the natural and scenic environment of the Piscataquog, Souhegan and Nashua River watershed communities of southern…

—
4
New Hampshire Preservation Alliance

Preservation of historic landmarks, communities and landscapes in order to protect and revitalize the character of the Statess communities and add to their economic vitality.

—
5
Northern New Hampshire Healthcare Collaborative Inc

Northern New Hampshire Healthcare Collaborative, Inc. will ensure access to quality care within the communities in which our patients live, provide local and high quality care with positive outcomes to our patients in Coos County while…

—
6
Southern New Hampshire Health System Inc

Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.

Health
7
Harbor Homes Inc

Harbor Care's mission is to provide vital services, including housing and healthcare to all in our communities needing assistance. Our vision is one where everyone gets to live safe, stable, and healthy lives, filled with purpose, respect…

Housing & Shelter
8
Massachusetts Outdoor Heritage Foundation Inc Attn Susan Sacco
—
9
Greater Nashua Council on Alcoholism Keystone Hall

The holding company for 615 Amherst St, Harbor Care's licensed residential treatment center for individuals and families living with substance use disorder.

Health
10
Northeast Organic Farming Association of New Hampshire

NOFA-NH actively promotes organic, regenerative, ecologically sound farming, gardening, eating, and land care practices for healthy communities. NOFA-NH helps people build local, just, and sustainable food systems.

Food & Nutrition
11
New Hampshire Farm Museum Inc

To preserve new hampshires agricutural roots and celebrate the contemporary relevance of the states agricultural present

Arts & Culture
12
Peterborough Historical Society

The monadnock center connects residents and visitors to the history and culture of the monadnock region of nh.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Lakes Region Mental Health Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lebanon Outing Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealthcare Systems and Serv…Youth Empowerment ProgramsLocal History and Arts Orga…Civic Engagement & AdvocacyService Dogs and Dog RescueProfessional Trade Associat…Regional Conservation Organ…Independent K-12 SchoolsCommunity Performing ArtsAffordable Housing ProvidersVulnerable Populations Supp…Vulnerable Population Suppo…Disability Services & Housi…Youth Summer Camps
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%1%<5yr12%6%5–10yr20%20%10–20yr20%28%20–35yr14%24%35–55yr17%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr12%4%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr20%18%20–35yr14%23%35–55yr17%40%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%2/163
the rest of the field
9%
549/6,391

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

160 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 160 of the 201 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
55
Early backer (in before they grew)
156/160
Grantees still filing
117/160
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CATHOLIC CHARITIES NEW HAMPSHIRE DBA NH FOOD BANK — $300,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES NEW HAMPSHIRE DBA NH FOOD BA…+100 more — $1,037,025 · Other+100 moreNew Hampshire Catholic Charities — $500,000 · Human ServicesNew Hampshire Catholic CharitiesWEBSTER HOUSE — $90,000 · Human ServicesWEBSTER HOUSE+24 more — $397,909 · Human Services+24 moreCANTERBURY SHAKER VILLAGE INC — $36,000 · Arts & CultureCANTERBURY SH…BUILDING COMMUNITY IN NEW HAMPSHIRE — $32,500 · Arts & CultureBUILDING COMM…THE MOVING COMPANY DANCE CENTER — $25,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MOVING CO…GREAT NORTH WOODS CENTER FOR THE ARTS — $23,000 · Arts & CultureGREAT NORTH W…New Hampshire Historical Society — $20,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF CENTENNIAL HALL INC — $20,000 · Arts & CultureAPPLE HILL CENTER FOR CHAMBER MUSIC INC — $19,000 · Arts & CultureCONCORD COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL — $15,000 · Arts & CultureSEE SCIENCE CENTER INC — $15,000 · Arts & Culture+23 more — $181,056 · Arts & Culture+23 moreNorthern Forest Center Inc — $25,000 · EducationTAPROOT FARM & ENVIRONMENT EDU CTR — $25,000 · EducationNH CIVICS — $22,000 · EducationWHITE MOUNTAIN SCIENCE INC — $17,500 · EducationNASHUA ADULT LEARNING CENTER INC — $15,000 · EducationMONT VERNON LIBRARY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $12,500 · EducationCLAREMONT LEARNING PARTNERSHIP — $10,000 · EducationAMERICAN FURNITURE MASTERS INSTITUTE — $10,000 · EducationMonarch School of New England Inc — $10,000 · EducationMONADNOCK ART X TECH — $7,500 · Education+1 more — $5,000 · EducationSOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FORESTS — $30,000 · EnvironmentTIN MOUNTAIN CONSERVATION CENTER INC — $29,500 · EnvironmentNEWFOUND LAKE REGION ASSOCIATION — $20,000 · EnvironmentLAND FOR GOOD INC — $12,089 · EnvironmentNEW HAMPSHIRE LAKES ASSOCIATION INC — $10,000 · EnvironmentSQUAM LAKES NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER — $10,000 · EnvironmentAudubon Society of New Hampshire — $7,500 · EnvironmentCHOCORUA LAKE CONSERVANCY — $7,500 · EnvironmentNew Hampshire Recycles — $7,434 · Environment+5 more — $21,500 · EnvironmentGREATER NASHUA DENTAL CONNECTION INC — $15,600 · HealthTHE LAKES REGION MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC — $15,000 · HealthAmoskeag Health — $15,000 · HealthFarmsteads of New England Inc — $14,000 · HealthHOPE ON HAVEN HILL INC — $10,000 · HealthTRANSPORTATION ASSISTANCE FOR SEACOAST CITIZENS — $10,000 · HealthVNA at HCS Inc — $10,000 · HealthNEW HAMPSHIRE CHILDREN'S TRUST INC — $5,000 · Health+2 more — $4,114 · HealthBoys & Girls Club of Greater Nashua Inc — $34,500 · Youth DevelopmentNashua Police Athletic League — $22,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MANCHESTER — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF THE GREEN AND WHITE MTNS — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentGRANITE STATE ADAPTIVE — $9,450 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN NH INC — $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,337,025Human Services$987,909Arts & Culture$386,556Education$159,500Environment$155,523Health$98,714Youth Development$95,950

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNew Hampshire Catholic Charities — $500,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWEBSTER HOUSE — $90,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF NEW HAMPSHIRE — $37,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCANTERBURY SHAKER VILLAGE INC — $36,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Greater Nashua Inc — $34,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetBUILDING COMMUNITY IN NEW HAMPSHIRE — $32,500 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetMOORE CENTER SERVICES INC — $32,198 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UPPER ROOM A FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER — $31,821 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetSOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FORESTS — $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FRONT DOOR AGENCY INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetSEEDS OF FAITH INC — $30,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetTIN MOUNTAIN CONSERVATION CENTER INC — $29,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CONCORD NH — $27,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWAYPOINT — $26,765 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVISIONS FOR CREATIVE HOUSING SOLUTIONS — $25,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetThe Visiting Nurse Association Of Franklin — $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPENACOOK ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetNorthern Forest Center Inc — $25,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTAPROOT FARM & ENVIRONMENT EDU CTR — $25,000 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetThe Granite Young Men's Christian Association — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MOVING COMPANY DANCE CENTER — $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGIBSON CENTER FOR SENIOR SERVICES INC — $24,825 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetCIRCLE PROGRAM — $24,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetGREAT NORTH WOODS CENTER FOR THE ARTS — $23,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetMAYHEW — $22,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetROCHESTER OPERA HOUSE INC — $22,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetORGANIZATION FOR REFUGEE AND — $22,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetNashua Police Athletic League — $22,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetNH CIVICS — $22,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetBelknap House — $21,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNEWFOUND LAKE REGION ASSOCIATION — $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCONCORD CHORALE INC — $20,000 over 4y, 6.1% of budgetNew Hampshire Historical Society — $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSTEPPING STONES — $20,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetST JOSEPH COMMUNITY SERVICES DBA MEALS ON WHEELS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY — $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF CENTENNIAL HALL INC — $20,000 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE — $19,520 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetMARGUERITE'S PLACE INC — $19,250 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetAPPLE HILL CENTER FOR CHAMBER MUSIC INC — $19,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetFamily Promise of Southern New Hampshire — $18,737 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetGrafton County Senior Citizens Council Inc — $18,054 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FRIENDS PROGRAM INC — $17,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetWHITE MOUNTAIN SCIENCE INC — $17,500 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetThe Mental Health Center of Greater Manchester Inc — $17,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMONADNOCK MUSIC — $16,500 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetGREATER NASHUA DENTAL CONNECTION INC — $15,600 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCONCORD COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL — $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charita…Cogswell Benevolent T…Samuel P Hunt Foundat…Arthur L Getz Charita…Eversource Energy Fou…Trust Uw Oleonda Jame…Arthur Jr Dobles & Ol…Agnes M Lindsay TrustGranite United WayBangor Savings Bank F…The McIninch Foundati…Eastern Bank Foundati…
New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH190.9× affinity141 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Samuel P Hunt Foundation · Arthur L Getz Charitable Tr · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · Trust Uw Oleonda Jameson · Arthur Jr Dobles & Olive G Dobles Crut · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · Granite United Way · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · The McIninch Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-Trustees funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Willing Hands Enterprises Inc — 17% of income from government
  • Reach Out and Read Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Appalachian Mountain Club — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
61report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-Trustees?

Find your warmest path to Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-Trustees through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 201 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines