Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Madden Charities

To be involved with and support youth groups of the tri-vally and east bay area as well as providing medical research in fields of heart disease, diabetes, and cancer.

$960k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$275k
Largest
01What you fund
0170% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$580kRecreation & Sports$510kHealth$285kPhilanthropy$10kAnimals$10kYouth Development$10kArts & Culture$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $648k
  • $250k+1 grant · $275k
$56,025
Median grant
1
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UCSF FOUNDATION$275,000
COLLEGE TRACK$220,000
BISHOP ODOWD HIGH SCHOOL$200,000
CAL POLY$171,534
OTHER CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION$56,025
OAKLAND TECH BOYS BASKETBALL$10,000
FOOTHILL ATHLETIC BOOSTERS$10,000
VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY$10,000
MUSEUM ON MAIN$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%STANFORD HEALTH CARE 227: $10k → 8%COLLEGE TRACK: $220k → 10%CAL POLY: $172k → 12%BLACK COLLEGE FOOTBALL HOF: $15k → 13%COLLEGE TRACK: $130k → 10%CAL POLY: $128k → 12%FOOTHILL ATHLETIC BOOSTERS: $10k → 10%FOOTHILL ATHLETIC BOOSTERS: $9k → 10%BISHOP ODOWD HIGH SCHOOL: $200k → 10%VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY: $10k → 10%OAKLAND TECH BOYS BASKETBALL: $10k → 10%BISHOP ODOWD HIGH SCHOOL: $150k → 10%MUSEUM ON MAIN: $8k → 10%OTHER CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION: $1.0M → 10%OTHER CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION: $974k → 10%OTHER CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION: $853k → 10%OTHER CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION: $712k → 10%OTHER CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION: $701k → 10%OTHER CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION: $199k → 10%OTHER CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION: $56k → 10%OTHER CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION: $55k → 10%LIVERMORE VALLEY WINE AUCTION: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.6M · 5 repeat orgs$338k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
3

Total granted

$5.6M
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
0%

Still filing today

60%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $303k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationRecreation & SportsHealthPhilanthropyAnimalsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OC
    OTHER CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $4.6M
  • OL
    OAKLAND LITERACY COALITION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $350k
  • CT
    COLLEGE TRACK
    2× · 2023–2024 · $350k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • BC
    BLACK COLLEGE FOOTBALL HALL OF FAME INC
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • SH
    STANFORD HEALTH CARE
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +14%
  • LV
    LIVERMORE VALLEY WINEGROWERS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -35%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of California Student Association

The University of California Student Association (UCSA) is a coalition of students and student governments that aims to provide a collective voice for all students through advocacy and direct action. UCSA participates in the shared…

Education
2
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
3
Cal State Fullerton Philanthropic Foundation

To actively promote, pursue and steward private support for the advancement of california state university, fullerton.

Philanthropy
4
The University Foundation At Sacramento State

Raise private resources to advance the mission and priorities of the university and serve as ambassadors in the community. provide stewardship in the prudent investment of resources and ensure the integrity of the foundation through…

Education
5
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
6
Pitzer College

Pitzer College produces engaged socially responsible citizens of the world through an academically rigorous, interdisciplinary liberal arts education emphasizing social justice, intercultural understanding and environmental sensitivity.…

Education
7
University of the Pacific

To provide a superior, student-centered learning experience integrating liberal arts and professional education and preparing individuals for lasting achievement and responsible leadership in their careers and communities.

Education
8
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
9
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
10
Polytechnic School

The mission of polytechnic school is to develop the unique intellect, talents, and character of each student in a community dedicated to academic excellence, personal responsibility, and service to others. the school envisions a community…

Education
11
California State University Foundation

Established in 1962, the foundation is the central foundation for the california state university (csu) system and serves the office of the chancellor. the foundation exists to support excellence in teaching and learning, and to serve the…

Philanthropy
12
San Francisco University High School

At san franicisco university high school, we engage our community of diverse voices in a transformational experience that embraces the spirited pursuit of learning and empowers purpose larger than self.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of California San Francisco Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Valley Humane SocietyInc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OTHER CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION — $4,584,074 · OtherOTHER CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONOAKLAND LITERACY COALITION — $350,000 · OtherOAKLAND LITERACY COALITION+2 more — $28,500 · OtherCOLLEGE TRACK — $350,000 · EducationCOLLEGE TRACKCAL POLY CORPORATION — $299,729 · EducationCAL POLY CORPORAT…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $275,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CAL…BLACK COLLEGE FOOTBALL HALL OF FAME INC — $15,000 · Recreation & SportsSTANFORD HEALTH CARE — $10,000 · HealthValley Humane SocietyInc — $10,000 · AnimalsLIVERMORE VALLEY WINEGROWERS FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropyAmador Livermore Valley Historical Society — $7,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$4,962,574Education$924,729Recreation & Sports$15,000Health$10,000Animals$10,000Philanthropy$10,000Arts & Culture$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOLLEGE TRACK — $350,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCAL POLY CORPORATION — $299,729 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $275,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOTHILL ATHLETIC BOOSTERS — $18,500 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetBLACK COLLEGE FOOTBALL HALL OF FAME INC — $15,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSTANFORD HEALTH CARE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetValley Humane SocietyInc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLIVERMORE VALLEY WINEGROWERS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetPTC CA CONGRESS OF PARENTS TEACHERS — $10,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetAmador Livermore Valley Historical Society — $7,500 over 1y, 2.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Madden Charities funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Madden Charities?

    Find your warmest path to Madden Charities through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph