· Private foundation
Macedonian Call Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $128k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $95k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GLOBAL OUTREACH | $94,600 |
| SAMARITAN'S PURSE | $27,600 |
| MOUNTAIN EMPIRE OLDER CITIZENS | $25,000 |
| OAK GROVE BAPTIST CHURCH | $22,000 |
| MEALS WITH A MISSION | $20,200 |
| RIVERLAND ROAD BAPTIST CHURCH | $12,000 |
| MT OLIVE BAPTIST CHURCH | $10,800 |
| AMEN HOUSE | $10,000 |
| KINGS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY | $7,000 |
| GUEST RIVER PENTECOSTAL CHURCH | $3,800 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,800 |
| LAMBS CHAPEL MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHU | $2,900 |
| NORTON CHRISTIAN CHURCH | $2,900 |
| JOANNA MINISTRIES | $2,900 |
| EAGLES NEST REGENERATION | $2,750 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 62% of grant dollars ($1.6M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 38% that went abroad ($1.0M) is mapped below.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $103k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Beyond the US — 38% of all-years giving ($1.0M)
2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
32 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SPSAMARITAN'S PURSE9× · 2017–2025 · $297k · revenue +134%
- MEMOUNTAIN EMPIRE OLDER CITIZENS INC6× · 2020–2025 · $101k · revenue +34%
- KCKING'S CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC7× · 2017–2025 · $96k · revenue +10%
Funded once
- CCCHRIST CENTRALone grant, 2019 · $20k
- CCCOWAN COMMUNITY CENTERone grant, 2023 · $10k
- BABLANKET AMERICA MINISTRIES INCone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -99%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To glorify god by equipping the church with proper christian doctrine and to help non-believers come to a saving knowledge of jesus christ.
None
To help those struggling in a personal crisis find relief and disciple them into a christ-centered lifestyle through a ministry of reconciliation, applying the truth of scripture, working with others and sharing in fellowship with those…
To seek the lost sheeps of god and comfort them, make the disciples of jesus christ, and to work together in holy spirit, to build the kingdom of god in the gospel restricted nations where christians are being persecuted because of their…
Christian services including missions efforts, humanitarian aide, mentoring/discipleship, establishment and covering of churches, licensing/ordaining ministers, pastoral support, all domestically and internationally.
To strengthen marriages and families, to encourage Christian fellowship as we evangelize the lost around us and minister to the needy with the resources God has blessed us.
Grace evangelistic ministries, inc. conducts crusades and conferences in various countries to evangelize the lost and present them with an accurate interpretation of the gospel. for those who decide to believe, we help them form bible…
Christian mission service - to provide means for the proclamation of the gospel of jesus christ through the establishment and maintenance of mission ministries.
Minister the gospel of jesus
The mission of jesus alive is to reach as many rural villages within kenya, tanzania, south africa, south sudan, uganda and the drc.
Religious and counselling
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Charlotte Rescue Mission and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN EMPIRE OLDER CITIZENS INC ↗
- Who funds KING'S CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds CORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds CHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds CHRIST CENTRAL SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds AMEN HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds BLANKET AMERICA MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds IRIS GLOBAL ↗
- Who funds EAGLES NEST REGENERATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Macedonian Call Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Macedonian Call Inc?
Find your warmest path to Macedonian Call Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.