· Private foundation
Macdonald Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Read this first · the figures below need context
75% of Macdonald Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Santa Barbara Foundation, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 45 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Macdonald Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 25 organizations, $2M. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2020
- Under $10k4 grants · $26k
- $10k–50k22 grants · $554k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $270k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WINE EDUCATION COUNCIL | $1,500,000 |
| HARBOR DAY SCHOOL | $100,000 |
| COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM AND DRUG ABUSE | $70,000 |
| RIVERSIDE SCHOOL | $50,000 |
| WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL | $50,000 |
| LAGUNA BLANCE SCHOOL | $45,000 |
| CAL POLY FOUNDATION CENTER | $40,000 |
| DREAM FOUNDATION | $35,000 |
| RM PYLES BOYS CAMP | $35,000 |
| WESTMINSTER SCHOOLS | $35,000 |
| GLOBAL LYME ALLIANCE | $35,000 |
| BREAST CANCER RESOURCE CENTER OF SANTA BARBARA | $35,000 |
| YOSEMITE CONSERVANCY | $35,000 |
| SANTA BARBARA REGION OF CATHOLIC | $28,000 |
| LOBERO THEATRE FOUNDATION | $28,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $140k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2020, 0 since wound down; 49 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- COCouncil on Alcoholism & Drug Abuse2× · 2020–2025 · $114k · revenue +69%
- LBLAGUNA BLANCA SCHOOL2× · 2020–2025 · $90k · revenue +33%
- WFWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL2× · 2020–2025 · $87k · revenue +49%
Funded once
- WEWINE EDUCATION COUNCIL INCone grant, 2020 · $1.5M · revenue +6%
- HDHarbor Day Schoolgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +78%
Rape Abuse & Incest National Networkone grant, 2025 · $100k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The santa barbara zoo is dedicated to the preservation, conservation, and enhancement of the natural world and its living treasures through education, research, recreation and conservation.
Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…
The organization was established to protect and restore the santa barbara channel and its watersheds through science-based advocacy, education, field work, community engagement, and citizen enforcement of environmental laws.
Santa Barbara Education Foundation (SBEF) provides and supports programs that enrich the academic, artistic, and personal development of all students in the Santa Barbara Unified School District.
To operate a school for grades 6-9, delivering a holistic program of academics, arts & athletics, community service, and outdoor education that fosters passion for life and learning, self trust, strength and courage to succeed, and…
The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…
Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.
Santa barbara wildlife care network (sbwcn) serves to rescue, rehabilitate and return to the wild sick, injured, orphaned, or oil-impaired wild birds, reptiles, amphibians, and small mammals in santa barbara and ventura counties and to…
The San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory is dedicated to the conservation of birds and their habitats through science and outreach.
The california wildlife center (cwc) takes responsibility for the protection of all native wildlife through rehabilitiation, education and conservation. as the los angeles area's premier wildlife medical care and rehabilitation facility,…
Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…
The mission of San Bruno Mountain Watch is to care for San Bruno Mountain through conservation, ecological restoration, education,and advocacy in partnership with local communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Barbara Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WINE EDUCATION COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds Council on Alcoholism & Drug Abuse ↗
- Who funds Harbor Day School ↗
- Who funds Rape Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN) ↗
- Who funds LAGUNA BLANCA SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL SERVICES OF RICHMOND INC ↗
- Who funds DALMATIAN DREAMS DBA DREAM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RIVER CITY INCLUSIVE GYMNASTICS INC ↗
- Who funds YOSEMITE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTH FLORIDA WILDLIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WILDLIFE RESCUE AND REHABILITATION INC ↗
- Who funds HAPPY DOGGO ↗
- Who funds THE GREY MUZZLE ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds PEACHTREE PRESBYTERIAN PRE-SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds RM PYLES BOYS CAMP ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL LYME ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds RIVERSIDE SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds THE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Westminster Schools Inc ↗
- Who funds CHARITY GLOBAL INC ↗
- Who funds TIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LOBERO THEATRE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA SCHOOL OF SQUASH ↗
- Who funds THE ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA POLICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESOURCE CENTER OF SANTA BARBARA ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA YOUTH PROJECT ↗
- Who funds TEDDY BEAR CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PIERRE CLAEYSSENS VETERANS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA FULTON COUNTY ZOO INC ↗
- Who funds HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Santa Barbara Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · Ann Jackson Family Foundation · The Wood-Claeyssens Foundation · Alice Tweed Tuohy Foundation · Mosher Foundation · Elizabeth and John Moller Foundation · Rudi Schulte Family Foundation · Williams-Corbett Foundation · Kim and Andrew D Busch Family Foundation · Www Foundation · Brittingham Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Macdonald Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Coral Restoration Foundation Inc — 16% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Macdonald Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Macdonald Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.