· Private foundation
Elizabeth and John Moller Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k41 grants · $77k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $130k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WORLD MONUMENTS FUND INC | $40,000 |
| STARS & STRIPES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| NANTUCKET SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION | $23,140 |
| FINE PRINT FUNDING INC | $20,000 |
| ALL SAINTS BY THE SEA | $12,000 |
| CRANE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| GARDEN CONSERVANCY INC | $7,500 |
| FRIENDS OF FAI - THE ITALIAN ENVIRONMENT FOUNDATIO | $7,000 |
| NANTUCKET ATHENEUM INC | $6,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR NANTUCKET INC | $5,500 |
| NANTUCKET GOLF CLUB FOUNDATION INC | $5,500 |
| BREAST CANCER RESOURCE CENTER OF SANTA BARBARA | $5,000 |
| NANTUCKET COTTAGE HOSPITAL INC | $3,500 |
| ALZHEIMERS DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION | $3,500 |
| SANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF ART | $2,850 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
34 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $72k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RLROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON SCHOOL3× · 2018–2024 · $93k · revenue +37%
- WMWORLD MONUMENTS FUND INC3× · 2022–2024 · $88k · revenue +78%
- POPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE3× · 2021–2023 · $35k · revenue +34%
Funded once
- TFTHE FOOD BANKone grant, 2020 · $20k
- MSMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTERone grant, 2022 · $15k
- TOTABLE OF LIFE MINISTRIESone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -70%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Creating excellent exhibits and educational experiences that celebrate the santa barbara channel and illuminate our rich connections with the sea.
The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…
The santa barbara public library foundation supports the long-term health and sustainability of the santa barbara public library through public-private partnerships.
To integrate art into the lives of people, fostering imagination, stimulating thought, and creating personally rewarding experiences.
The catalina island conservancy protects and stewards 88% of catalina island. more than 42,000 acres of wildlands, coves and coastal habitats. founded to preserve the island's natural resources, the conservancy advances a mission rooted in…
To protect and steward in perpetuity the unique natural, cultural, and asthetic resources of the preserve and serve as a model of ecologically sustainable development to committees outside the preserve.
To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.
The organization was established to protect and restore the santa barbara channel and its watersheds through science-based advocacy, education, field work, community engagement, and citizen enforcement of environmental laws.
The sbcc foundation fuels the excellence of santa barbara city college by engaging the community, building relationships, and inviting the generosity of donors. the resources raised and managed by the foundation enrich college programs,…
The los angeles conservancy is a nonprofit membership organization that works through education and advocacy to recognize, preserve, and revitalize the historic architectural and cultural resources of los angeles county.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Barbara Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Fine Print Funding Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
71 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 71 of the 88 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds WORLD MONUMENTS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds FINE PRINT FUNDING INC ↗
- Who funds PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc ↗
- Who funds STARS AND STRIPES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CRANE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PIERRE CLAEYSSENS VETERANS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET PRESERVATION TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET ATHENEUM INC ↗
- Who funds CASA DEL HERRERO ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds CANCER FOUNDATION OF SANTA BARBARA ↗
- Who funds LOBERO THEATRE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TABLE OF LIFE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE GARDEN CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF FAI - THE ITALIAN ENVIRONMENT ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TEDDY BEAR CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET GOLF CLUB FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESOURCE CENTER OF SANTA BARBARA ↗
- Who funds STORYTELLER CHILDRENS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
- Who funds GARDEN CLUB OF SANTA BARBARA ↗
- Who funds SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF SANTA BARBARA ↗
- Who funds STEVENSON UNIVERSITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ann Jackson Family Foundation · Santa Barbara Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · Mosher Foundation · Alice Tweed Tuohy Foundation · The Kirby-Jones Foundation · The Wood-Claeyssens Foundation · The Leslie S and Philip L Bernstein Family Fund · Brittingham Family Foundation · Www Foundation · Manitou Fund · The Nurture Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Elizabeth and John Moller Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc — 10% of income from government
- Stevenson University — 6% of income from government
- New England Life Flight Inc — 5% of income from government
- Nantucket Dreamland Foundation Inc — 4% of income from government
- Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc — 4% of income from government
- New Haven International Festival of Arts and Ideas Inc — 1% of income from government
- Nantucket Historical Association — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Elizabeth and John Moller Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Elizabeth and John Moller Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.