Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

M Omar Ashraf Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$133k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Human Services$199kReligion$106kInternational$61kHealth$53kCivil Rights$45kFood & Nutrition$28kEducation$22kCommunity Improvement$9kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $82k
$4,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$688k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Adams$30,758
Helping Hand$28,500
Faith$23,200
ACHN$9,000
Pearl Foundation$5,000
Equally Able$5,000
Al Fatih Academy$5,000
Justice For All$5,000
CAIR Foundation$4,000
Orphan Care$3,000
Al Salaam Academy$3,000
Baitulmaal$2,656
ICNA$2,500
The Eagle Institute$2,500
Maruf Inc$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $200k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Helping Hand: $29k → 8%Helping Hands: $11k → 8%Helping Hands: $10k → 8%Helping Hands: $7k → 8%Helping Hand Relief and Development: $4k → 8%Faith: $23k → 6%Helping Hand Relief and Development: $2k → 8%Faith: $23k → 6%Helping Hand Relief and Development: $2k → 8%Faith: $20k → 6%FAITH: $18k → 6%FAITH: $17k → 6%FAITH: $12k → 6%FAITH: $12k → 6%FAITH: $5k → 6%FAITH: $3k → 6%FAITH: $3k → 6%FAITH: $1k → 6%FAITH: $500 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
IL
MI
NY
NJ
VA
MD
DC
AL
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$557k · 20 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
20

Total granted

$557k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+33%

Still filing today

50%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesHealthCivil RightsReligionEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    Foundation for Appropriate and Immediate Temporary
    7× · 2018–2024 · $136k · revenue +47%
  • HH
    HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC
    4× · 2018–2024 · $37k · revenue +71%
  • CI
    CAIR-FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $34k · revenue +141%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • AE
    ADAMS Endowment Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • AC
    ADAMS Compassionate Healthcare Networkgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +207%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Muslim Aid America

Provide help to people who are victims of natural disasters or conflicts or suffering from poverty, hunger, disease, illiteracy, discrimination, homelessness, debt, unemployment, injustice, or lack of skills or economic opportunity.

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Bangladesh American Society of Muslim Aid for Huma
Philanthropy
3
Al Ansaar Foundation for Humanity
Philanthropy
4
International Institute of Islamic Thought the Fairfax Institute
Education
5
Rehmat Foundation
Philanthropy
6
The Noor Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Isaad foundation

Isaad Foundation aspires to preserve human dignity and to help achieve happiness, and to achieve the necessary needs for all individuals.

Philanthropy
8
Rahma Worldwide Aid and Development

Rahma delivers emergency and development programs to needy communities, without discrimination based on gender, race, religion, or location. we aim to empower and develop individuals and communities affected by hardship globally.

International
9
Alsajdah Foundation
Religion
10
Us Help Inc

We are a non-profit charity organization that humbly aims to provide to those in need around the world. With gratitude & love, we try to provide food, water, clothing, shelter, peace & education to needy persons, families and communities.

Human Services
11
Omeed

Omeed continues to provide the following through projects in pakistan and azad kashmir: (i) free healthcare for women and children through the kashif free clinic in dhamial, rawalpindi, pakistan, (ii) scholarships for students in…

International
12
Foundation for Islamic Scholarship and Teaching
Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foundation for Appropriate and Immediate Temporary and the most unlike its peers is American Muslim Instituition. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Adams — $136,758 · OtherAdamsORPHAN CARE — $18,000 · OtherORPHAN CAREACHN — $12,000 · Other+25 more — $61,689 · Other+25 moreFoundation for Appropriate and Immediate Temporary — $136,300 · Human ServicesFoundation for Appropriate and Immediate …HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC — $36,500 · Human ServicesHELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT I…HELPING HANDS INC — $27,500 · Human ServicesHELPING HANDS INCEQUALLYABLE FOUNDATION — $21,000 · Human ServicesEQUALLYABLE FOUNDATIONPEARL FOUNDATION — $48,500 · InternationalPEARL FOUND…ISLAMIC RELIEF USA — $6,000 · InternationalISLAMIC REL…BAITULMAAL INC — $2,656 · International+2 more — $3,000 · InternationalCAIR-FOUNDATION INC — $33,500 · Civil RightsJUSTICE FOR ALL — $9,000 · Civil RightsADAMS ENDOWMENT FUND INC — $26,500 · ReligionALL NEIGHBORS — $1,000 · ReligionMUSLIM EDUCATION RESOURCE COUNCIL INC — $11,500 · EducationMARUF INC — $2,000 · EducationAUTISM SPEAKS INC — $5,000 · HealthADAMS Compassionate Healthcare Network — $3,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc — $1,000 · Health
Other$228,447Human Services$221,300International$60,156Civil Rights$42,500Religion$27,500Education$13,500Health$9,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFoundation for Appropriate and Immediate Temporary — $136,300 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetPEARL FOUNDATION — $48,500 over 5y, 35% of budgetHELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC — $36,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCAIR-FOUNDATION INC — $33,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHELPING HANDS INC — $27,500 over 3y, 24% of budgetADAMS ENDOWMENT FUND INC — $26,500 over 4y, 31% of budgetEQUALLYABLE FOUNDATION — $21,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetMUSLIM EDUCATION RESOURCE COUNCIL INC — $11,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetJUSTICE FOR ALL — $9,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetISLAMIC RELIEF USA — $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetADAMS Compassionate Healthcare Network — $3,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBAITULMAAL INC — $2,656 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetB DESH FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPENNY APPEAL USA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALL NEIGHBORS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAmerican Muslim Instituition — $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetOPPORTUNITY SCHOLARS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Foundation for Appropriate and Immediate Temporary
  • Who funds PEARL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC
  • Who funds CAIR-FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds HELPING HANDS INC
  • Who funds ADAMS ENDOWMENT FUND INC
  • Who funds EQUALLYABLE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MUSLIM EDUCATION RESOURCE COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds JUSTICE FOR ALL
  • Who funds ISLAMIC RELIEF USA
  • Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC
  • Who funds ADAMS Compassionate Healthcare Network
  • Who funds BAITULMAAL INC
  • Who funds B DESH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MARUF INC
  • Who funds PENNY APPEAL USA INC
  • Who funds ALL NEIGHBORS
  • Who funds American Muslim Instituition

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sterling Charitable Gift FundVA24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sterling Charitable Gift Fund · The Mirza Family Foundation · Barzinji Family Foundation · Altalib Family Foundation - Aff · Texas Instruments Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization M Omar Ashraf Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to M Omar Ashraf Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to M Omar Ashraf Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph