Skip to content

· Private foundation

M D Jirous and Barbara Jirous Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$552k
Granted FY2024still arriving
97
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0179% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$1.4MEducation$556kReligion$295kHealth$227kPhilanthropy$191kYouth Development$115kHuman Services$106kRecreation & Sports$38kOther$0
02FY2024 · 97 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k87 grants · $170k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $97k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $285k
$1,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OETA$100,000
PHSAA INC$85,000
CHEROKEE HISTORY CENTER$50,000
PIVOT$50,000
OKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN$30,000
INTERGRIS HEALTH FOUNDATION$25,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
PERRY WRESTLING FOUNDATION$10,000
PONCA CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$10,000
OK END HOMELESSNESS$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
PUTNAM CITY SCHOOLS$7,000
NORTHERN OKLAHOMA COLLEGE$5,777
CROSSING CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$5,500
UNITED FUND OF PERRY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $210k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JESUS HOUSE: $5k → 16%JESUS HOUSE: $5k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $5k → 16%JESUS HOUSE: $5k → 16%HOUSE OF HEALING: $500 → 9%JESUS HOUSE: $4k → 16%CENTER OF FAMILY LOVE: $10k → 9%JESUS HOUSE: $3k → 16%JESUS HOUSE: $3k → 16%JESUS HOUSE: $3k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $2k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $2k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $2k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $2k → 16%CALM WATERS: $2k → 16%CALM WATERS: $2k → 16%CALM WATERS: $2k → 16%CALM WATERS: $2k → 16%CALM WATERS: $2k → 16%HONORING AMERICA'S WARRIORS: $5k → 16%HONORING AMERICA'S WARRIORS: $3k → 16%CITY CENTER OUTREACH: $1k → 16%OKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN: $30k → 16%PIVOT: $50k → 16%PIVOT: $20k → 16%PIVOT: $10k → 16%PIVOT: $10k → 16%PIVOT: $10k → 16%PIVOT: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
MD
NM
AR
DC
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.7M · 135 repeat orgs$506k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

135 repeat relationships: 82 still active in FY2024, 53 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

135
85

Total granted

$3.7M
$430k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+21%

Still filing today

14%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $76k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IH
    INTEGRIS Health Foundation Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $125k · revenue +16%
  • CS
    CHEROKEE STRIP HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    3× · 2020–2022 · $112k · revenue +102% · 42% of their budget
  • PIVOT INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $110k · revenue +288%

Funded once

  • FRIENDS OF OETA INC
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +1%
  • PH
    PERRY HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI
    one grant, 2018 · $75k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation
Arts & Culture
2
Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

—
3
Oklahoma Scholarship Fund Inc
—
4
Ok Foundation

Serving the needs of the whole child, including education, safety, environment, health, and well-being.

Philanthropy
5
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Masonic Charity Foundation of Oklahoma
Health
7
Oklahoma City Public Schools Foundation Inc

We are the leading advocate for okcps. we strengthen our schools through community investment, strategic partnerships, and innovative programs.

Education
8
Oklahoma Secondary School Activities Association

The OSSAA will serve member schools by providing leadership in the development, supervision, and conduct of co-curricular activities, which enrich the educational experiences of high school students. It will provide for equitable…

—
9
Oklahoma Academy for State Goals

To provide information to citizens. The organization encourages the utilization and developement of the State of Oklahomas resourses.

—
10
Pi Beta Phi Foundation of Okc
Philanthropy
11
Cowboy Hall of Fame Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc

To support the oklahoma city community foundation by supporting the national cowboy and western heritage museum.

Arts & Culture
12
Oklahoma Military Heritage Foundation

Oklahoma Military Heritage Foundation, DBA Oklahoma Military Hall of Fame Foundation, honors the men and women of Oklahoma, living and deceased, who serve or have served in the Uniformed Services of the United States with records of…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Positive Tomorrows Inc; the most unlike its peers is Honoring Americas Warriors Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 235 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
25/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OETA: $751,500 · OtherOETAPHSAA INC: $535,000 · OtherPHSAA INCFRIENDS OF OKLAHOMA HISTORY CENTER: $450,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF OKLAHOMA HISTORY CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $200,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDEPT OF CLASSICS UNIV OF OK: $150,000 · Other+176 more: $1,583,907 · Other+176 morePIVOT INC: $110,000 · Human ServicesOKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesJesus House Inc: $25,500 · Human ServicesCITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $17,500 · Human ServicesThe Center of Family Love: $10,000 · Human ServicesCALM WATERS CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesHONORING AMERICAS WARRIORS INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesINTEGRIS Health Foundation Inc: $125,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF OETA INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · EducationCharles Haskell Elementary PTO Inc: $13,000 · EducationHarvest Hills Elementary PTO: $8,500 · EducationOakdale School Foundation: $7,000 · EducationNorthwestern Oklahoma State University Foundation Inc and Alumni Association: $6,500 · Education+2 more: $4,000 · EducationREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $16,250 · Food & NutritionMISSION MARSHALL INC: $4,000 · Food & NutritionCASHION EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $9,000 · Philanthropy
Other$3,670,407Human Services$208,000Health$125,000Arts & Culture$100,000Education$79,000Food & Nutrition$20,250Philanthropy$9,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTEGRIS Health Foundation Inc: $125,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCHEROKEE STRIP HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $112,000 over 3y, 42% of budgetPIVOT INC: $110,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJesus House Inc: $25,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $17,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $16,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCharles Haskell Elementary PTO Inc: $13,000 over 8y, 14% of budgetThe Center of Family Love: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCASHION EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 7y, 9.1% of budgetTHE UNITED FUND OF PERRY OKLAHOMA INCORPORATED: $8,000 over 8y, 4.9% of budgetBlackwell Chamber of Commerce: $7,500 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetCALM WATERS CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $7,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHONORING AMERICAS WARRIORS INC: $7,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetPERRY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $7,475 over 6y, 4.3% of budgetOakdale School Foundation: $7,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetNorthwestern Oklahoma State University Foundation Inc and Alumni Association: $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMYRIAD GARDENS FOUNDATION: $4,950 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION MARSHALL INC: $4,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetOKLAHOMA ENERGY FOOTBALL CLUB: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL SCHOOL CHAPLAIN ASSOC INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOklahoma State University Foundation: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNICHOLS HILLS PARKS INC: $1,550 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTAND FOR THE SILENT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTEGRIS Health Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHEROKEE STRIP HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds PIVOT INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF OETA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds Jesus House Inc ↗
  • Who funds CITY RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds Charles Haskell Elementary PTO Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK27.9× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Inasmuch Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · The Merrick Foundation · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Robert Glenn Rapp Foundation · Rainbolt Family Foundation · Fred Jones Family Foundation · The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation · Love Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc · Servant Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization M D Jirous and Barbara Jirous Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from M D Jirous and Barbara Jirous Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 230%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Pivot Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
23get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 235 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on M D Jirous and Barbara Jirous’ filings →

More from the funding graph