Skip to content

· Private foundation

M & J Kaiser Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$123k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$145kReligion$74kHealth$45kEducation$31kHuman Services$24kFood & Nutrition$10kPhilanthropy$5kEnvironment$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $58k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $66k
$2,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN LUTHERAN CHURCH$29,500
THEODORE ROOSEVELT MEDORA FOUNDATION$25,000
SHARLOT HALL HISTORICAL SOCIETY$11,000
TEXARTS$9,000
BUFFALO BILL MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION$7,500
EANES EDUCATION FOUNDATION$5,000
MAYO CLINIC$5,000
BALLET AUSTIN$4,000
SUPPORT HOOVER RIDGE$3,000
AGAPE HOUSE$3,000
BEST BUDDIES$3,000
HOPE FOR THE HURTING$3,000
STEPPING STONES FOUNDATION INC$2,000
ZACHARY SCOTT THEATER CENTER$2,000
NORTH DAKOTA COWBOY HALL OF FAME$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FRASER: $1k → 12%STEPPING STONES FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 14%FRASER: $1k → 12%Fraser: $1k → 12%STEPPING STONES FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 14%Fraser: $1k → 12%FRASER: $1k → 12%STEPPING STONES FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 14%FRASER: $1k → 12%Partnerships for Children: $2k → 10%Partnerships for Children: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ND
MN
IL
WY
SD
CA
CO
NE
KY
VA
AZ
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$374k · 35 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

35 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
11

Total granted

$374k
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+1%

Still filing today

49%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    TexArts Association for Visual & Performing Arts
    6× · 2020–2025 · $43k · revenue +458%
  • BB
    Buffalo Bill Memorial Association
    3× · 2023–2025 · $32k · revenue +16%
  • TR
    Theodore Roosevelt Medora Foundation
    3× · 2020–2025 · $26k · revenue +97%

Funded once

  • HF
    HOLLAND FOUNDATION FOR SIGHT RESTORATION
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -15%
  • BB
    Buffalo Bill Historical Center
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • SH
    SHARLOT HALL HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF AZ
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tucson Audubon Society

Inspire people to enjoy and protect birds through recreation, education, conservation, and restoration of the environment, upon which we all depend.

Animals
2
Witte Museum

The witte museum inspires people to shape the future of texas through transformative and relevant experiences in nature, science and culture.

Arts & Culture
3
Glasstire

Glasstire is a website about visual art in Texas. Our mission is to expand the conversation about visual art in Texas.

Arts & Culture
4
Opera Southwest

Professional production of opera for the public, and education about opera and the performing arts for audiences of all ages.

Arts & Culture
5
Austin Public Library Friends Foundation

Support and strengthen austin public libraries

Education
6
Aia Arizona the American Institute of Architects

To advance the knowledge and abilities of organization members in the field of architecture through seminars, networking, and member services.

—
7
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
8
University of Arizona Foundation

The university of arizona foundation is committed to supporting and enhancing the vision, mission and values of the university of arizona through the development and management of private support.

Education
9
Associated Universities Inc

Associated universities inc (aui) collaborates with the scientific community and research sponsors to plan, build, and operate cutting-edge facilities. we cultivate excellence, deliver value, enhance education, and engage the public.

Science & Tech
10
Loft Cinema Inc Fka Tucson Cinema Foundation Inc

Building community by celebrating the art and diversity of film.

Arts & Culture
11
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

—
12
San Jacinto Museum and Battlefield Association

To collect and preserve significant historical materials that relate to the early history and culture of Texas and to promote the study of the history of Texas through exhibits, publications, and educational programs.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fort Abraham Lincoln Foundation; the most unlike its peers is North Dakota Cowboy Hall of Fame in. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
16/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN LUTHERAN CHURCH: $63,000 · OtherAMERICAN LUTHERAN CHURCHSHARLOT HALL HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $33,500 · OtherSHARLOT HALL HISTORICAL SOCIETYTheodore Roosevelt Medora Foundation: $26,383 · OtherTheodore Roosevelt Medora Foundation10-10 MINISTRIES INC: $25,750 · Other10-10 MINISTRIES INCBuffalo Bill Historical Center: $15,000 · OtherBuffalo Bill Historical CenterAGAPE HOUSE: $9,000 · Other+27 more: $51,041 · Other+27 moreTexArts Association for Visual & Performing Arts: $43,000 · Arts & CultureTexArts Association for Vis…Buffalo Bill Memorial Association: $31,500 · Arts & CultureBuffalo Bill Memorial Assoc…ZACHARY SCOTT THEATRE CENTER: $18,000 · Arts & CultureZACHARY SCOTT THEATRE CENTE…NORTH DAKOTA COWBOY HALL OF FAME IN: $9,000 · Arts & CultureNORTH DAKOTA COWBOY HALL OF…SHARLOT HALL HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF AZ: $5,000 · Arts & CultureBALLET AUSTIN INCORPORATED: $4,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,250 · Arts & CultureHOLLAND FOUNDATION FOR SIGHT RESTORATION: $25,000 · HealthHOLLAND FOUN…MAYO CLINIC: $25,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICEanes Education Foundation: $32,000 · EducationEanes Edu…CHINO VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2,375 · EducationCHINO VAL…FRIENDS OF THE PRESCOTT PUBLIC LIBRARY: $2,000 · EducationTHE SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE: $2,000 · EducationPARTNERSHIPS FOR CHILDREN: $11,000 · Human ServicesFRASER LTD: $6,000 · Human ServicesSTEPPING STONES FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesHOPE FOR THE HURTING: $13,000 · Food & NutritionABERCROMBIE & KENT PHILANTHROPY INC: $4,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF YAVAPAI COUNTY INC: $3,000 · Philanthropy
Other$223,674Arts & Culture$111,750Health$50,000Education$38,375Human Services$21,000Food & Nutrition$13,000Philanthropy$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTexArts Association for Visual & Performing Arts: $43,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetEanes Education Foundation: $32,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetBuffalo Bill Memorial Association: $31,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTheodore Roosevelt Medora Foundation: $26,383 over 3y, 0.0% of budget10-10 MINISTRIES INC: $25,750 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetHOLLAND FOUNDATION FOR SIGHT RESTORATION: $25,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetZACHARY SCOTT THEATRE CENTER: $18,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE FOR THE HURTING: $13,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetPARTNERSHIPS FOR CHILDREN: $11,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH DAKOTA COWBOY HALL OF FAME IN: $9,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFRASER LTD: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSHARLOT HALL HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF AZ: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSTEPPING STONES FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBALLET AUSTIN INCORPORATED: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetABERCROMBIE & KENT PHILANTHROPY INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF YAVAPAI COUNTY INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHINO VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2,375 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE PRESCOTT PUBLIC LIBRARY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFORT ABRAHAM LINCOLN FOUNDATION: $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPrescott Area Shelter Services Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGrand Canyon Institute: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN NUMISMATIC ASSOCIATION: $500 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TexArts Association for Visual & Performing Arts ↗
  • Who funds Eanes Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Buffalo Bill Memorial Association ↗
  • Who funds Theodore Roosevelt Medora Foundation ↗
  • Who funds 10-10 MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLLAND FOUNDATION FOR SIGHT RESTORATION ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds ZACHARY SCOTT THEATRE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HOPE FOR THE HURTING ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERSHIPS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds NORTH DAKOTA COWBOY HALL OF FAME IN ↗
  • Who funds FRASER LTD ↗
  • Who funds SHARLOT HALL HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF AZ ↗
  • Who funds STEPPING STONES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BALLET AUSTIN INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds ABERCROMBIE & KENT PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
  • Who funds Best Buddies International Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF YAVAPAI COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHINO VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE PRESCOTT PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds THE SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE ↗
  • Who funds FORT ABRAHAM LINCOLN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ19.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Jw Kieckhefer Foundation · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · United Way Worldwide · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization M & J Kaiser Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from M & J Kaiser Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to M & J Kaiser Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to M & J Kaiser Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on M & J Kaiser’s filings →

    More from the funding graph