· Private foundation
M a C C Foundation
Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k16 grants · $26k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $24k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Calvary Evangelistic Center | $12,000 |
| Spiritual Freedom Church | $12,000 |
| Church on the Street | $8,400 |
| New Christian Baptist Fellowship | $2,000 |
| Bread of Life Foursquare Gospel | $2,000 |
| Calvary Street Isaiah 58 Ministries | $2,000 |
| Vision Beyond Borders | $2,000 |
| SOS Ministries | $1,500 |
| We Care Pregnancy Center of Benson | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| Judicial Watch | $1,000 |
| Pearson Place - Pregnancy Resource | $1,000 |
| Eloise Carey Evangelistic Assoc | $1,000 |
| Bridges Ministry | $1,000 |
| World Vision | $928 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
16 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- COCHURCH ON THE STREET INC4× · 2020–2023 · $36k
- CECALVARY EVANGELISTIC CENTER3× · 2021–2023 · $27k
- SFSpiritual Freedom Church2× · 2022–2023 · $24k
Funded once
- SFSpiritual Freedom Church Inc and Inone grant, 2020 · $12k
- SFSpiritual Freedom Church of Phoenixone grant, 2021 · $12k
- VCVAIL CHRISTIAN CHURCHone grant, 2020 · $4k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To reach 300 million Russian and Ukrainian speaking people over 100 different nationalities throughout the world with the Gospel of Jesus Christ through television and internet broadcasts, through conferences and evangelical outreach and…
To present the gospel by providing life-long opportunities to integrate faith and learning through balanced, biblically based scholarship, training people to love god by renewing their minds and equipping the church to engage the world for…
To provide the bible in accurate, contemporary translations and formats so that more people around the world will have the opportunity to be transformed by jesus christ.
Ptm worldwide publishes christianity without the religion magazine and plain truth magazine. ptm further serves with daily radio programs, blogs, bible surveys and many other free inspirational resources on its website, www.ptm.org
The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…
Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ
Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.
To equip disciples of Jesus Christ to balance and live their lives to glorify God in every area of life; spirituall, personally, communally and physically by
Reaching and teaching pastors in the majority world.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Vision Inc and the most unlike its peers is A2 Ministries International Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 7% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PROJECT VERITAS ↗
- Who funds VISION BEYOND BORDERS INC ↗
- Who funds CALVARY STREET-ISAIAH 58 MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
- Who funds ELOISE CAREY EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds TRINITY CHRISTIAN CENTER OF SANTA ANA ↗
- Who funds TRUTH IN LOVE MINISTRY CORP ↗
- Who funds A2 MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL LTD ↗
- Who funds Pacific Justice Institute ↗
- Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
- Who funds PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOOD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization M a C C Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.