Skip to content

· Private foundation

M a & G a Ackerman Memorial Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
33
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$1.5MReligion$825kHealth$726kEducation$277kHousing & Shelter$265kPhilanthropy$210kYouth Development$125kCrime & Legal$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k24 grants · $697k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $670k
$34,539
Median grant
3
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES$100,000
ST JOHN EPISCOPAL HOSPITAL$100,000
CATHEDRAL CHURCH OF ST JOHN THE DIVINE$100,000
LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS$90,000
BISHOP ANDERSON FOUNDATION$70,000
NEW YORK FOUNDLING HOSPITAL$60,000
ASCENSION ILLINOIS ALEXIAN BROS$50,000
CABRINI IMMIGRANT SERVICES NYC$50,000
ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$50,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$45,000
LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF METROPOLITAN$40,000
HOLY FAMILY MINISTRIES$40,000
LAWNDALE CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER$40,000
CHICAGO LIGHTS$35,000
XAVIER MISSION$35,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $690k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NEW YORK FOUNDLING HOSPITAL: $60k → 17%NEW YORK FOUNDLING HOSPITAL: $60k → 17%NEW YORK FOUNDLING HOSPITAL: $50k → 17%CHICAGOLAND METHODIST SR SVC: $20k → 14%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $100k → 17%CHICAGOLAND METHODIST SR SVC: $20k → 14%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $100k → 17%MISERICORDIA HOME: $30k → 14%MISERICORDIA HOME: $30k → 14%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $100k → 17%MISERICORDIA HOME: $20k → 14%MARYVILLE ACADEMY: $20k → 14%BETHANY HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY: $30k → 14%BETHANY HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY: $25k → 14%TALLER DE JOSE JOSEPHS WORKSHOP: $20k → 14%TALLER DE JOSE JOSEPHS WORKSHOP: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 29 repeat orgs$655k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
12

Total granted

$3.2M
$380k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+14%

Still filing today

52%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $275k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LS
    LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS
    3× · 2023–2025 · $305k · revenue +20%
  • NY
    NEW YORK FOUNDLING
    3× · 2023–2025 · $170k · revenue +12%
  • LC
    LAWNDALE CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER
    3× · 2023–2025 · $147k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • AB
    Alexian Brothers Bonaventure House
    one grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue -7%
  • LS
    LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF METRO
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • AC
    ARCHCARE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Holy Cross Hospital

The hospital is a catholic health care organization sponsored by the sisters of st. casimir. by our commitment to witness to the healing mission of jesus, we contribute to healthy communities and promote quality health care to all with…

Health
2
Catholic Health Services Inc

To provide health care and services to those in need; to minimize human suffering; to assist people to wholeness and to nurture an awareness of their relationship with god.

—
3
Saint Mary Home Incorporated

We, mercy community health and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming presence within our communities. saint mary home is a member of mercy community health and trinity health.

—
4
St Catherine of Siena Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
5
Little Sisters of the Poor Chicago St Mary's Home

The little sisters of the poor operate st. mary's home, which provides nursing and residential care for the needy elderly. the home is part of the international congregation of the little sisters of the poor, which was founded in france in…

—
6
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
7
Nursing Sisters Home Care Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
8
St Jude House Inc

MISSION - ST. JUDE HOUSE, Inc. (St. Jude House) IS a family violence prevention center and shelter; our mission is TO CELEBRATE LIFE AND SERVE WITH JOY. Vision - St. Jude House is a catalyst in Northwest Indiana for the prevention,…

Housing & Shelter
9
St Charles Hospital Corp

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
10
Saint Joseph's Mercy Care Services Inc

We, saint joseph's health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. honoring the heritage and advancing the ministry of the sisters of…

—
11
Chs Physician Partners Pc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
12
Franciscan Community Benefit Services

MISSION - TO celebrate life and serve with joy. Vision - to provide access to Catholic high schools and offer programs for higher education and career readiness for young women from the Chicago area.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicagoland Methodist Senior Services; the most unlike its peers is Holy Family Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
13/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS: $305,000 · OtherLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOISCATHEDRAL CHURCH OF ST JOHN THE DIVINE: $260,000 · OtherCATHEDRAL CHURCH OF ST JOHN THE DIVINEBISHOP ANDERSON FOUNDATION: $210,000 · OtherBISHOP ANDERSON FOUNDATIONLAWNDALE CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER: $147,000 · OtherLAWNDALE CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTERCABRINI IMMIGRANT SERVICES NYC: $145,000 · OtherCABRINI IMMIGRANT SERVICES NYCST ANTHONY HOSPITAL: $139,000 · OtherST ANTHONY HOSPITALLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $114,539 · OtherST JOHN EPISCOPAL HOSPITAL: $100,000 · OtherCRISTO REY NY HIGH SCHOOL: $92,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITY COMMUNITY SERVICES: $85,000 · OtherJUDSON MEMORIAL CHURCH INC: $85,000 · Other+21 more: $856,000 · Other+21 moreGOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $300,000 · Human ServicesGOOD SHEPHERD SERVIC…NEW YORK FOUNDLING: $170,000 · Human ServicesNEW YORK FOUNDLINGMISERICORDIA HOME: $80,000 · Human ServicesMISERICORDIA HOMEBethany House of Hospitality: $55,000 · Human ServicesBethany House of Hos…CHICAGOLAND METHODIST SENIOR SERVICES: $40,000 · Human ServicesCHICAGOLAND METHODIS…TALLER DE JOSE: $25,000 · Human Services+1 more: $20,000 · Human ServicesST FRANCIS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $140,000 · HealthSt Bernard Hospital: $30,000 · HealthXAVIER MISSION INC: $85,000 · Housing & ShelterMERCY HOUSING LAKEFRONT: $75,000 · Housing & ShelterHOLY FAMILY MINISTRIES: $125,000 · EducationSTUDENTSPONSOR PARTNERS INC: $15,000 · EducationCHICAGO LIGHTS: $110,000 · PhilanthropyCornerstone Community Outreach: $50,000 · Community ImprovementTRINITY COMMUNITY CONNECTION INC: $35,000 · Religion
Other$2,538,539Human Services$690,000Health$170,000Housing & Shelter$160,000Education$140,000Philanthropy$110,000Community Improvement$50,000Religion$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS: $305,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $300,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK FOUNDLING: $170,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLAWNDALE CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER: $147,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetST FRANCIS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $140,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHOLY FAMILY MINISTRIES: $125,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCHICAGO LIGHTS: $110,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetXAVIER MISSION INC: $85,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetMISERICORDIA HOME: $80,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAlexian Brothers Bonaventure House: $75,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetMERCY HOUSING LAKEFRONT: $75,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFRANCISCAN OUTREACH: $55,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBethany House of Hospitality: $55,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetARCHCARE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCornerstone Community Outreach: $50,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCHICAGOLAND METHODIST SENIOR SERVICES: $40,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTRINITY COMMUNITY CONNECTION INC: $35,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetTALLER DE JOSE: $25,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetCRISTO REY BROOKLYN HIGH SCHOOL: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMaryville Academy: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTUDENTSPONSOR PARTNERS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK FOUNDLING ↗
  • Who funds LAWNDALE CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLY FAMILY MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO LIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds XAVIER MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds MISERICORDIA HOME ↗
  • Who funds Alexian Brothers Bonaventure House ↗
  • Who funds MERCY HOUSING LAKEFRONT ↗
  • Who funds FRANCISCAN OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds Bethany House of Hospitality ↗
  • Who funds ARCHCARE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Cornerstone Community Outreach ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGOLAND METHODIST SENIOR SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY COMMUNITY CONNECTION INC ↗
  • Who funds St Bernard Hospital ↗
  • Who funds TALLER DE JOSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Helen V Brach FoundationIL25.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Helen V Brach Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · WP & HB White Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Washington Square Health Foundation · The a Montgomery Ward Foundation · George M Eisenberg Foundation for Charities · Greater Chicago Food Depository · Uw Harry S Black & Allon Fuller · The Rhoades Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization M a & G a Ackerman Memorial Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from M a & G a Ackerman Memorial Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on M a & G a Ackerman Memorial’s filings →

    More from the funding graph