Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lute Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$17k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$466kPublic Safety & Disaster$261kPhilanthropy$193kHealth$78kRecreation & Sports$69kArts & Culture$18kCommunity Improvement$10kCrime & Legal$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$1,744
Median grant
1
States reached
$676k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIG MAC SPORTS CLUB$11,085
LIED CENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTS$3,295
ROTARY CLUB OF OGALLALA$1,744
ST LUKES SCHOOL$822
NORTH PLATTE CATHOLIC SCHOOLS ENDOW$381
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 13% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%OGALLALA LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $200k → 11%WALLACE RURAL FIRE DISTRICT: $48k → 12%LIED CENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTS: $3k → 13%NEBRASKA FIREFIGHTERS MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%OGALLALA LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $100k → 11%GREAT PLAINS HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION: $26k → 12%LIED CENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTS: $3k → 13%KEITH COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $100k → 11%GREAT PLAINS HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION: $18k → 12%LIED CENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTS: $3k → 13%CITY OF OGALLALA: $73k → 11%GREAT PLAINS HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION: $9k → 12%HEARTLAND PHILANTHROPY: $64k → 11%GREAT PLAINS HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION: $8k → 12%CITY OF OGALLALA: $63k → 11%GREAT PLAINS HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION: $4k → 12%OGALLALA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $52k → 11%BIG MAC SPORTS CLUB: $50k → 11%GREAT PLAINS HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%OGALLALA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $33k → 11%OGALLALA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $31k → 11%HEARTLAND PHILANTHROPY: $26k → 11%BIG MAC SPORTS CLUB: $11k → 11%SANDHILL CRISIS INTERVENTION PROGRAM: $10k → 11%OGALLALAKEITH COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $8k → 11%KEITH COUNTY: $8k → 11%OGALLALA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $6k → 11%OGALLALA PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%OGALLALA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $4k → 11%PETRIFIED WOOD & ART GALLERY: $3k → 11%KEITH-ARTHUR COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC: $3k → 11%FRIENDS OF THE KENFIELD GALLERY: $3k → 11%KEITH COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY: $3k → 11%VARIOUS: $2k → 11%PETRIFIED WOOD & ART GALLERY: $2k → 11%ROTARY CLUB OF OGALLALA: $2k → 11%OGALLALA LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%FRIENDS OF THE KENFIELD GALLERY: $2k → 11%OGALLALA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $1k → 11%BIG MAC SPORTS CLUB: $1k → 11%BIG MAC SPORTS CLUB: $1k → 11%BIG MAC SPORTS CLUB: $827 → 11%ST LUKES SCHOOL: $822 → 11%BIG MAC SPORTS CLUB: $782 → 11%BIG MAC SPORTS CLUB: $750 → 11%BIG MAC SPORTS CLUB: $750 → 11%KEITH COUNTY SENIOR CENTER: $730 → 11%ST LUKES SCHOOL: $503 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$816k · 13 repeat orgs$190k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +144% since the first grant, against +56% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
18

Total granted

$816k
$189k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+144%
+56%

Still filing today

23%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OL
    OGALLALA LIBRARY FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $302k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2020–2021 · $136k
  • HP
    HEARTLAND PHILANTHROPY INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $90k · revenue -62% · 70% of their budget

Funded once

  • KC
    KEITH COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • WR
    WALLACE RURAL FIRE DISTRICT
    one grant, 2017 · $48k
  • SC
    SANDHILLS CRISIS INTERVENTIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +43%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nebraska Academy of Sciences
Science & Tech
2
Northern Plains Heritage Foundation
Arts & Culture
3
Odell Nebraska Public Library
Education
4
North Dakota Natural Resources Trust
5
Nebraska Game and Parks Foundation

The organization is focused on the future of parks, wildlife management and conservation of nebraska.

Environment
6
Mutual of Omaha Foundation
Philanthropy
7
North Dakota Masonic Foundation
8
Kearney County Community Foundation

The foundation's purpose is to establish a charitable foundation for charitable, civic, educational and scientific purposes for the use and benefit of persons of kearney county, nebraska.

Philanthropy
9
Grassland Heritage Foundation

The foundation promotes the value of tallgrass prairies

10
North Dakota Cowboy Hall of Fame in

Education and preservation of western heritage

Arts & Culture
11
The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Nebraska State Fair 1868 Foundation

The mission of the nebraska state fair 1868 foundation is to raise funds and resources for the overall improvement of the nebraska state fair.

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid-Nebraska Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Ogallalakeith County Chamber of Commerce. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OGALLALA LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $301,676 · OtherOGALLALA LIBRARY FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $135,554 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKEITH COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $100,000 · OtherKEITH COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONHEARTLAND PHILANTHROPY INC — $89,979 · OtherHEARTLAND PHILANTHROPY INCOGALLALA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT — $72,017 · OtherOGALLALA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENTBIG MAC SPORTS CLUB — $66,154 · OtherBIG MAC SPORTS CLUBWALLACE RURAL FIRE DISTRICT — $47,795 · OtherWALLACE RURAL FIRE DISTRICT+14 more — $43,066 · OtherNEBRASKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $100,000 · PhilanthropyNEBRASKA C…+3 more — $1,350 · PhilanthropyGREAT PLAINS HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION — $67,266 · HealthSANDHILLS CRISIS INTERVENTION — $10,000 · HealthOGALLALA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $60,977 · Education+2 more — $1,400 · EducationNebraska Firefighters Foundation — $5,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THE KENFIELD GALLERY — $4,205 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $250 · Arts & CulturePACIFIC WHALE FOUNDATION — $200 · Environment
Other$856,241Philanthropy$101,350Health$77,266Education$62,377Arts & Culture$9,455Environment$200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEBRASKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEARTLAND PHILANTHROPY INC — $89,979 over 2y, 70% of budgetGREAT PLAINS HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION — $67,266 over 6y, 3.6% of budgetOGALLALA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $60,977 over 4y, 47% of budgetSANDHILLS CRISIS INTERVENTION — $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetOGALLALAKEITH COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $8,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetNebraska Firefighters Foundation — $5,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE KENFIELD GALLERY — $4,205 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetKEITH - ARTHUR COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC — $2,802 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNORTH PLATTE CATHOLIC SCHOOLS ENDOWMENT TRUST INC — $1,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMID-NEBRASKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE KEARNEY AREA INC — $350 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPACIFIC WHALE FOUNDATION — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJIMMIE JOHNSON FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nebraska Community FoundationNE19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nebraska Community Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lute Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lute Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Lute Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph