Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lucy and Emily Beasley Charitable Trust V15913003

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$325k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$882kEducation$756kHousing & Shelter$469kYouth Development$306kReligion$208kCommunity Improvement$111kCrime & Legal$104kHealth$68kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $210k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$6.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CUMBERLAND COLLEGE$100,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE WESTERN RESERVE$40,000
OPEN M$40,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$35,000
BROKEN CHAINS MINISTRY$30,000
ACCESS$20,000
ARDMORE FOUNDATION INC$15,000
BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER$15,000
AKRON ROTARY FOUNDATION$15,000
HAVEN OF REST$8,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
WEBB SCHOOL$1,000
VALLEY VIEW BAPTIST CHURCH$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $575k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER: $20k → 13%BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER: $18k → 13%BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER: $18k → 13%battered women's shelter: $18k → 13%BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER: $16k → 13%BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER: $15k → 13%BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER: $15k → 13%BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER: $15k → 13%BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER: $13k → 13%FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY: $20k → 13%FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY: $20k → 13%FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY: $17k → 13%FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY: $16k → 13%FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY: $15k → 13%family promise of summit county: $14k → 13%OPEN M: $40k → 13%OPEN M: $40k → 13%OPEN M: $35k → 13%OPEN M: $35k → 13%OPEN M: $35k → 13%OPEN M: $33k → 13%OPEN M: $32k → 13%OPEN M: $30k → 13%open m: $30k → 13%FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY: $15k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 23 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
0

Total granted

$3.0M
$0

Still filing today

57%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyAnimalsCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $575k · revenue +158%
  • AI
    ACCESS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $221k · revenue +129%
  • BU
    Belmont University
    6× · 2017–2022 · $161k · revenue +86%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Humane Society of Summit County Foundation

    The organization was created to provide financial support to humane society of summit county, which elects a majority of the trustees.

    Animals
    2
    Summit Legal Aid

    Civil justice for those in need, their homes secured, families protected, and finances fortified.

    Crime & Legal
    3
    Empowering and Strengthening Ohio's People Inc

    Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.

    Housing & Shelter
    4
    Summit Housing Development Corp

    Summit housing delevopment corporation (shdc) started in 1992 as a private, non-profit corporation with the purpose of delevoping, acquiring, and managing housing for those with developmental disabilities.

    Housing & Shelter
    5
    Harmony House Inc

    Harmony house is an emergency supportive housing program for young people ages 18-24. harmony house provides emergency housing, transitional housing, rapid rehousing and inclement weather shelter. harmony house is the only program of its…

    Housing & Shelter
    6
    Southeastern Ohio Center for Independent Living

    Provide services to people with disabilities. such services include assistance with housing, employment, transportation and recreational issues.

    Human Services
    7
    Summit Community Care Clinic Inc

    Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.

    Health
    8
    Human Development Corporation Ta the Su

    The summit school educates children from grades one through eight with unique learning profiles to their full potential.

    Education
    9
    Summit Independent Living Center

    Summit's mission is to advance the independence and civil rights of people with disabilities.

    —
    10
    Summit County Clubhouse

    The organization's mission is to help people with mental health and substance abuse challenges live connected and satisfying lives through productive work, meaningful relationship, and direct support.

    Health
    11
    Opportunity Homes Inc

    Provide services to persons with special needs.

    Human Services
    12
    Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

    Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

    Human Services
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise of Summit County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Opportunity Parish Ecumenical Neighborhood Ministry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    3
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    13/15
    Grantees still filing
    12/15
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    THE SALVATION ARMY: $365,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC: $306,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INCACCESS INC: $221,000 · OtherACCESS INCBROKEN CHAINS MINISTRY: $199,000 · OtherBROKEN CHAINS MINISTRYHM Life Opportunity Services: $75,000 · OtherHM Life Opportunity ServicesGENNESARET INC: $56,000 · OtherHAVEN OF REST MINISTRIES INCORPORATED: $53,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $48,000 · Other+5 more: $44,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC: $575,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLAND…Belmont University: $161,000 · EducationBelmont University+1 more: $9,000 · EducationOPPORTUNITY PARISH ECUMENICAL NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRY: $310,000 · Human ServicesOPPORTUNITY PARISH EC…HOPE AND HEALING SURVIVOR RESOURCE CENTER: $148,000 · Human ServicesHOPE AND HEALING SURV…FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY INC: $117,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE OF SUM…AKRON ROTARY FOUNDATION: $111,000 · Community ImprovementCASA BOARD VOLUNTEER ASSOCIATION IN: $104,000 · Civil RightsARDMORE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyHUMANE SOCIETY OF SUMMIT COUNTY: $20,000 · Animals
    Other$1,367,000Education$745,000Human Services$575,000Community Improvement$111,000Civil Rights$104,000Philanthropy$50,000Animals$20,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC: $575,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetOPPORTUNITY PARISH ECUMENICAL NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRY: $310,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC: $306,000 over 9y, 3.5% of budgetACCESS INC: $221,000 over 9y, 2.8% of budgetBelmont University: $161,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE AND HEALING SURVIVOR RESOURCE CENTER: $148,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY INC: $117,000 over 7y, 5.0% of budgetAKRON ROTARY FOUNDATION: $111,000 over 9y, 18% of budgetCASA BOARD VOLUNTEER ASSOCIATION IN: $104,000 over 6y, 6.5% of budgetHM Life Opportunity Services: $75,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetGENNESARET INC: $56,000 over 6y, 7.4% of budgetARDMORE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 9y, 9.3% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SUMMIT COUNTY: $20,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WEBB SCHOOL: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSUMMIT COUNTY ADULT LITERACY COUNCIL: $6,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC ↗
    • Who funds OPPORTUNITY PARISH ECUMENICAL NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRY ↗
    • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC ↗
    • Who funds ACCESS INC ↗
    • Who funds Belmont University ↗
    • Who funds HOPE AND HEALING SURVIVOR RESOURCE CENTER ↗
    • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY INC ↗
    • Who funds AKRON ROTARY FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds CASA BOARD VOLUNTEER ASSOCIATION IN ↗
    • Who funds HM Life Opportunity Services ↗
    • Who funds GENNESARET INC ↗
    • Who funds ARDMORE FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF SUMMIT COUNTY ↗
    • Who funds THE WEBB SCHOOL ↗
    • Who funds SUMMIT COUNTY ADULT LITERACY COUNCIL ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Akron Community FoundationOH27.8× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Akron Community Foundation · United Way of Summit and Medina · Sisler McFawn Foundation Pfdn · The Rc Musson and Katharine Musson Charitable Foundation · Lehner Family Foundation · Lloyd L & Louise K Smith Foundation · L R Moffitt & L W Moffitt Foundation · Charles E and Mabel M Ritchie Memorial · The Welty Family Foundation · Gar Foundation · Northern Ohio Golf Charities Foundation Inc · The Babcox Family Foundation Inc

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Lucy and Emily Beasley Charitable Trust V15913003 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lucy and Emily Beasley Charitable Trust V15913003. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to Lucy and Emily Beasley Charitable Trust V15913003?

      Find your warmest path to Lucy and Emily Beasley Charitable Trust V15913003 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Lucy and Emily Beasley Charitable Trust V15913003’s filings →

      More from the funding graph