· Private foundation
Lucy and Emily Beasley Charitable Trust V15913003
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 46% of LUCY AND EMILY BEASLEY CHARITABLE TRUST V15913003’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $210k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CUMBERLAND COLLEGE | $100,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE WESTERN RESERVE | $40,000 |
| OPEN M | $40,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $35,000 |
| BROKEN CHAINS MINISTRY | $30,000 |
| ACCESS | $20,000 |
| ARDMORE FOUNDATION INC | $15,000 |
| AKRON ROTARY FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER | $15,000 |
| HAVEN OF REST | $8,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| WEBB SCHOOL | $1,000 |
| VALLEY VIEW BAPTIST CHURCH | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $575k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
23 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC9× · 2017–2025 · $575k · revenue +158%
- AIACCESS INC9× · 2017–2025 · $221k · revenue +44%
- BUBelmont University6× · 2017–2022 · $161k · revenue +86%
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization was created to provide financial support to humane society of summit county, which elects a majority of the trustees.
Civil justice for those in need, their homes secured, families protected, and finances fortified.
Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.
Summit housing delevopment corporation (shdc) started in 1992 as a private, non-profit corporation with the purpose of delevoping, acquiring, and managing housing for those with developmental disabilities.
Harmony house is an emergency supportive housing program for young people ages 18-24. harmony house provides emergency housing, transitional housing, rapid rehousing and inclement weather shelter. harmony house is the only program of its…
Provide services to people with disabilities. such services include assistance with housing, employment, transportation and recreational issues.
Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.
The summit school educates children from grades one through eight with unique learning profiles to their full potential.
Summit's mission is to advance the independence and civil rights of people with disabilities.
The organization's mission is to help people with mental health and substance abuse challenges live connected and satisfying lives through productive work, meaningful relationship, and direct support.
Provide services to persons with special needs.
Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise of Summit County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Opportunity Parish Ecumenical Neighborhood Ministry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY PARISH ECUMENICAL NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC ↗
- Who funds ACCESS INC ↗
- Who funds Belmont University ↗
- Who funds HOPE AND HEALING SURVIVOR RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds AKRON ROTARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CASA BOARD VOLUNTEER ASSOCIATION IN ↗
- Who funds HM Life Opportunity Services ↗
- Who funds GENNESARET INC ↗
- Who funds ARDMORE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF SUMMIT COUNTY ↗
- Who funds THE WEBB SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds SUMMIT COUNTY ADULT LITERACY COUNCIL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Akron Community Foundation · United Way of Summit and Medina · Sisler McFawn Foundation Pfdn · The Rc Musson and Katharine Musson Charitable Foundation · Lehner Family Foundation · Lloyd L & Louise K Smith Foundation · L R Moffitt & L W Moffitt Foundation · Charles E and Mabel M Ritchie Memorial · The Welty Family Foundation · Gar Foundation · Northern Ohio Golf Charities Foundation Inc · The Babcox Family Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Lucy and Emily Beasley Charitable Trust V15913003 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Lucy and Emily Beasley Charitable Trust V15913003?
Find your warmest path to Lucy and Emily Beasley Charitable Trust V15913003 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.