Skip to content

Ohio · Private foundation

Lucy and Emily Beasley Charitable Trust V15913003

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$325k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
13
Grants FY2025
16
Organizations funded FY2024
0%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$15,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$100,000
Organizations funded a year
15 to 23
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
3
Total assets, FY2025
$6.1M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations Lucy and Emily Beasley Charitable Trust V15913003 funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving13$325k0%
FY202416$320k0%
FY202315$315k0%
FY202219$356k0%
FY202119$349k0%
FY202019$312k0%
FY201922$310k0%
FY201823$363k4%
95% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$882kEducation$756kHousing & Shelter$469kYouth Development$306kReligion$208kCommunity Improvement$111kCrime & Legal$104kHealth$68kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 17 grantees
All grantees of Lucy and Emily Beasley Charitable Trust V15913003 by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
University of the Cumberlands Inc$575,00090%
Opportunity Parish Ecumenical Neighborhood Ministry$310,00091%
Boys & Girls Club of the Western Reserve Inc$306,00094%
Access Inc$221,00093%
Belmont University$161,00060%
Hope and Healing Survivor Resource Center$148,00091%
Family Promise of Summit County Inc$117,00075%
Akron Rotary Foundation$111,000918%
Casa Board Volunteer Association In$104,00067%
HM Life Opportunity Services$75,00062%
Gennesaret Inc$56,00067%
Haven of Rest Ministries Incorporated$53,0009n/a
Ardmore Foundation Inc$50,00099%
Humane Society of Summit County$20,00080%
The Webb School$9,00090%
Akron-Summit County Public Library$8,0003n/a
Summit County Adult Literacy Council$6,00030%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 6 recipients with no EIN on record ($642k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Lucy and Emily Beasley Charitable Trust V15913003 supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of the Cumberlands Inc: $575,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetOpportunity Parish Ecumenical Neighborhood Ministry: $310,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of the Western Reserve Inc: $306,000 over 9y, 3.5% of budgetAccess Inc: $221,000 over 9y, 2.8% of budgetBelmont University: $161,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHope and Healing Survivor Resource Center: $148,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetFamily Promise of Summit County Inc: $117,000 over 7y, 5.0% of budgetAkron Rotary Foundation: $111,000 over 9y, 18% of budgetCasa Board Volunteer Association In: $104,000 over 6y, 6.5% of budgetHM Life Opportunity Services: $75,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetGennesaret Inc: $56,000 over 6y, 7.4% of budgetArdmore Foundation Inc: $50,000 over 9y, 9.3% of budgetHumane Society of Summit County: $20,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetThe Webb School: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSummit County Adult Literacy Council: $6,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 15.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Akron Community FoundationOH27.8× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Akron Community Foundation · United Way of Summit and Medina · Sisler McFawn Foundation Pfdn · The Rc Musson and Katharine Musson Charitable Foundation · Lehner Family Foundation · Lloyd L & Louise K Smith Foundation · L R Moffitt & L W Moffitt Foundation · Charles E and Mabel M Ritchie Memorial · The Welty Family Foundation · Gar Foundation · Northern Ohio Golf Charities Foundation Inc · The Babcox Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Lucy and Emily Beasley Charitable Trust V15913003 with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lucy and Emily Beasley Charitable Trust V15913003?

Find your warmest path to Lucy and Emily Beasley Charitable Trust V15913003 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Lucy and Emily Beasley Charitable Trust V15913003

How much does Lucy and Emily Beasley Charitable Trust V15913003 give?
Lucy and Emily Beasley Charitable Trust V15913003 reported 13 grants totaling $325,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 15 and 23 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Lucy and Emily Beasley Charitable Trust V15913003 fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Human Services (30%), Education (25%), Housing & Shelter (16%).
Who are Lucy and Emily Beasley Charitable Trust V15913003's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: University of the Cumberlands Inc ($575k), Opportunity Parish Ecumenical Neighborhood Ministry ($310k), Boys & Girls Club of the Western Reserve Inc ($306k).
Does Lucy and Emily Beasley Charitable Trust V15913003 fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Lucy and Emily Beasley Charitable Trust V15913003 accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Lucy and Emily Beasley Charitable Trust V15913003?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Akron Community Foundation, United Way of Summit and Medina, Sisler McFawn Foundation Pfdn.
Where is Lucy and Emily Beasley Charitable Trust V15913003 based?
Lucy and Emily Beasley Charitable Trust V15913003 is based in OH.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lucy and Emily Beasley Charitable Trust V15913003’s filings →

More from the funding graph