Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lucinda C Gossett Charitable Trust

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$333k
Granted FY2019
18
Grants FY2019
3
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2019.

Education$145kReligion$110kHuman Services$75kArts & Culture$75kAnimals$22kFood & Nutrition$10kHealth$6kInternational$5kOther$0
02FY2019 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k6 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $155k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BETHESDA MISSION$75,000
NEW HOPE MINISTRIES$75,000
KEYS VINEYARD COMMUNITY CHURCH$35,000
U S ARMY HERITAGE FOUNDATION$25,000
NED SMITH CENTER FOR NATURE & ART$20,000
PENNSYLVANIA REGIONAL BALLET$15,000
CLEVE J FREDERICKSEN LIBRARY$10,000
JOSEPH T SIMPSON PUBLIC LIBRARY$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
HARRISBURG SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$10,000
CANINE RESCUE OF CENTRAL PA$10,000
CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK$10,000
PITTIES LOVE PEACE INC$6,000
PA BREAST CANCER COALITION$6,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NEW HOPE MINISTRIES: $75k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Pennsylvania Foundation

To encourage and motivate the making of gifts and donations by deed, will, or otherwise, for the advancement, promotion, extension, and maintenance of the various causes and objectives fostered by the humane pennsylvania.

Animals
2
Central Pennsylvania Humane Society

To prevent animal neglect and cruelty through education and enforcement while providing a safe haven and finding forever homes for those in need.

Animals
3
Humane Pennsylvania

Humane pennsylvania empowers the people in our communities to increase their capacity to care for animals so that all animals are healthy, safe, and treated humanely.

Animals
4
Pennsylvania Medical Society

The pennsylvania medical society is the voice of pennsylvania's physicians and the patients they serve. we advance quality patient care and the ethical practice of medicine. we promote physician leadership, education, professional…

—
5
Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (PSPCA) protects animals from cruelty and abuse, rescues and rehabilitates neglected, abandoned and unwanted animals, and promotes animal welfare throughout Pennsylvania.…

Animals
6
Pennsylvania Recreation and Park Society

The pennsylvania recreation and park society empowers recreation and park professionals and citizen advocates to enhance life-enriching services for all pennsylvanians.

Recreation & Sports
7
The Pennsylvania Horticultural Society

Founded in 1827, the pennsylvania horticultural society (phs) uses horticulture to advance the health and well-being of the greater philadelphia region. (continued in sch o)phs's work focuses on four impact priorities: creating healthy…

Environment
8
Punxsutawney Memorial Library Inc

Provide the public with current informational and recreational resources, services, and programming by maintaining a free, public non-sectarian library for all individuals in the punxsutawney service area.

—
9
New Castle Public Library

The purpose of the new castle public library is to provide free public library service to all residents of its designated service area and as further set forth in its articles of incorporation pursuant to the pennsylvania nonprofit…

Education
10
North Pocono Public Library

Public lending library

—
11
Carbondale Public Library

Public lending library

—
12
Northwestern Pennsylvania Humane Society D/B/a Erie Humane Society

Preventing animal cruelty

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Humane Society of Harrisburg Area Inc; the most unlike its peers is New Hope Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PSU-DICKINSON SCHOOL OF LAW: $125,000 · OtherPSU-DICKINSON SCHOOL OF LAWBETHESDA MISSION: $75,000 · OtherBETHESDA MISSIONKEYS VINEYARD COMMUNITY CHURCH: $35,000 · OtherKEYS VINEYARD COMMUNITY CHURCHU S ARMY HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherU S ARMY HERITAGE FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherCLEVE J FREDERICKSEN LIBRARY: $10,000 · OtherJOSEPH T SIMPSON PUBLIC LIBRARY: $10,000 · Other+2 more: $6,000 · OtherNEW HOPE MINISTRIES INC: $75,000 · Human ServicesNEW HOPE MINISTRIE…PENNSYLVANIA REGIONAL BALLET: $15,000 · Arts & CultureHARRISBURG SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureMECHANICSBURG MUSEUM ASSOCIATION: $4,794 · Arts & CultureNED SMITH CENTER FOR NATURE AND ART: $20,000 · EnvironmentCANINE RESCUE OF CENTRAL PA INC: $10,000 · AnimalsPITTIES LOVE PEACE: $6,000 · AnimalsCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK: $10,000 · Food & NutritionPENNSYLVANIA BREAST CANCER COALITION: $6,000 · PhilanthropyMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,000 · International
Other$296,000Human Services$75,000Arts & Culture$29,794Environment$20,000Animals$16,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Philanthropy$6,000International$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW HOPE MINISTRIES INC: $75,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNED SMITH CENTER FOR NATURE AND ART: $20,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA REGIONAL BALLET: $15,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOSEPH T SIMPSON PUBLIC LIBRARY: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCANINE RESCUE OF CENTRAL PA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetHARRISBURG SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA BREAST CANCER COALITION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPITTIES LOVE PEACE: $6,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF HARRISBURG AREA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMECHANICSBURG MUSEUM ASSOCIATION: $4,794 over 1y, 5.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of the Capital RegionPA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of the Capital Region · The Foundation for Enhancing Communities · Joseph T and Helen M Simpson Foundation · John Crain Kunkel Foundation · Anne & Philip Glatfelter III Family Foundation · Community Aid Inc · Pennsylvania Automotive Association Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lucinda C Gossett Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lucinda C Gossett Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lucinda C Gossett Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Lucinda C Gossett Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lucinda C Gossett’s filings →

    More from the funding graph