Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lubo Fund Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$547k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$182k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Philanthropy$993kArts & Culture$423kRecreation & Sports$163kEducation$129kFood & Nutrition$108kHealth$49kPublic Benefit$20kYouth Development$17kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$182,471
Median grant
1
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROBERT BUNNEN LUBO FOUNDATION ADVISED FUND$182,471
BELINDA BUNNEN REUSCH LUBO FOUNDATION ADVISED FUND$182,471
MELISSA BUNNEN JERNIGAN LUBO FOUNDATION ADVISED FUND$182,471
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MEALS ON WHEELS: $10k → 13%MEALS ON WHEELS: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
LA
AL
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 13 repeat orgs$802k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
106

Total granted

$1.4M
$802k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+31%

Still filing today

46%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RW
    ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $24k · revenue +14%
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS OF MIDDLE GEORGIA INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $15k · revenue +25%
  • CS
    CAMP SUNSHINE INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $10k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • H
    Hambidge
    one grant, 2021 · $225k
  • TI
    THE INTERNATIONAL TENNIS CLUB OF THE USAgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $85k · revenue +205% · 87% of their budget
  • EU
    Emory University Rose Library
    one grant, 2021 · $35k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Georgia Center for Nonprofits

Our mission is to create thriving communities by helping nonprofits succeed. our work revolves around four primary areas of focus.1. we are a hub for social innovation 2. we are a capacity accelerator for organizations and their people3.…

Community Improvement
2
Metro Atlanta Chamber of Commerce Inc

The corporation is a voluntary association of individuals and organizations the purposes of which are to upgrade and advance the atlanta metropolitan area in population, commerce and finance; to effect civic and social improvements; to…

3
Atlanta Committee for Progress Inc

ACP is a group committed to identifying and providing leadership on selected issues important to driving the economic development of the city of Atlanta and for which the ACP's active involvement will make a major difference. The ACP has a…

4
Georgia Alliance for Breast Cancer F/K/a It's the Journey

Georgia alliance for breast cancer mission is to engage with georgia's breast cancer community to increase access to care and reduce disparities in cancer outcomes.

Health
5
Georgia Aquarium Foundation Inc

To be the fundraising arm for the georgia aquarium, inc., to hold financial and other investments for the benefit of the georgia aquarium, inc., and to make distributions/grants/loans to and for the benefit of the georgia aquarium, inc.…

Animals
6
Spelman College

Spelman college, a historically black college and global leader in the education of women of african descent, is dedicated to the academic excellence of its students.

Education
7
Atlantic University Inc

Provide post-secondary education of excellence.

Education
8
The Atlanta Chapter the American Institute of Architects Inc

To provide education, networking opportunities, advocacy and professional industry information to the american institute of architects' atlanta chapter members.

9
Atlanta Celebrates Photography Inc

Atlanta celebrates photography (dba atlanta center for photography) (acp) advances new perspectives in lens-based media from the american south. through artwork commissions, community collaborations, and dynamic programs, acp supports…

Arts & Culture
10
Georgia Advanced Technology Ventures Inc

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively as a supporting organization to and for the benefit of the georgia institute of technology to foster and support education and scientific research and economic development…

Education
11
Acfb Support Organization Inc

Acfb support organization, inc., is operated exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes and/or activities of atlanta community food bank, inc., a georgia nonprofit corporation.

Food & Nutrition
12
Leadership Atlanta Inc

It is the mission of leadership atlanta to build a better community for everyone in the atlanta region through education about the key issues facing the region and inspiring members and others to take on and exercise real leadership…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Grady Health Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The National Museum of Women in the Arts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLand Conservation & Histori…Youth Education & Developme…Family Philanthropic Founda…Professional Association Ne…Healthcare Systems and Foun…Independent Schools and Aca…Youth Sports Booster Organi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%34%35–55yr16%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%52%35–55yr16%18%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/49
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,516

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 119 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
47/48
Grantees still filing
33/48
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ROBERT BUNNEN LUBO FOUNDATION ADVISED FUND — $324,471 · OtherROBERT BUNNEN LUBO FOUNDATION ADVISED FUNDBELINDA BUNNEN REUSCH LUBO FOUNDATION ADVISED FUND — $324,471 · OtherBELINDA BUNNEN REUSCH LUBO FOUNDATION ADVISED FUNDMELISSA BUNNEN JERNIGAN LUBO FOUNDATION ADVISED FUND — $324,471 · OtherMELISSA BUNNEN JERNIGAN LUBO FOUNDATION ADVISED FUNDHambidge — $225,000 · OtherHambidgeHAMBIDGE — $182,000 · OtherHAMBIDGEIndividual grant recipient — $128,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE INTERNATIONAL TENNIS CLUB OF THE USA — $85,000 · Other+83 more — $358,778 · Other+83 moreGEORGIA ALLIANCE EDUCATION FUND INC — $20,000 · EducationTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND — $20,000 · EducationWOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL — $10,000 · EducationTHE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOL IN VIRGINIA — $10,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF LAWRENCE ACADEMY AT GROTON MA CORP — $10,000 · EducationTHE LOVETT SCHOOL INC — $5,200 · Education+2 more — $3,000 · EducationGEORGIA ORGANICS INC — $50,500 · EnvironmentCHATTAHOOCHEE RIVERKEEPER INC — $5,000 · Environment+2 more — $1,100 · EnvironmentGEORGIA TENNIS FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 · Recreation & SportsJUNIOR TENNIS CHAMPIONS CENTER INC — $6,000 · Recreation & SportsCAMP TWIN LAKES INC — $5,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more — $500 · Recreation & SportsROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC — $23,500 · Arts & CultureATLANTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $6,750 · Arts & CultureATLANTA CONTEMPORY ART CENTER INC — $3,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR PUPPETRY ARTSINC — $2,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more — $2,500 · Arts & CultureATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $10,000 · Food & NutritionOPEN HAND ATLANTA INC — $10,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST GEORGIA INC — $5,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HELPINGS ATLANTA INC — $5,000 · Food & NutritionWHOLESOME WAVE GEORGIA INC — $2,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS OF MIDDLE GEORGIA INC — $15,000 · Human Services
Other$1,952,191Education$78,200Environment$56,600Recreation & Sports$46,500Arts & Culture$37,750Food & Nutrition$32,000Human Services$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL TENNIS CLUB OF THE USA — $85,000 over 1y, 87% of budgetGEORGIA ORGANICS INC — $50,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetGEORGIA TENNIS FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC — $23,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA ALLIANCE EDUCATION FUND INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF MIDDLE GEORGIA INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCAMP SUNSHINE INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCaptain Planet Foundation Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOL IN VIRGINIA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF LAWRENCE ACADEMY AT GROTON MA CORP — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN HAND ATLANTA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AGAPE CENTER INC — $8,000 over 1y, 67% of budgetATLANTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $6,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR TENNIS CHAMPIONS CENTER INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LOVETT SCHOOL INC — $5,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST GEORGIA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP TWIN LAKES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND HELPINGS ATLANTA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRUMAN NATIONAL SECURITY PROJECT — $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCHATTAHOOCHEE RIVERKEEPER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetARIZONA CENTER FOR EMPOWERMENT — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ATLANTA WOMENS FOUNDATION INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetATLANTA CONTEMPORY ART CENTER INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE GRADY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHOLESOME WAVE GEORGIA INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR PUPPETRY ARTSINC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAtlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc — $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBUCKHEAD HERITAGE SOCIETY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGROVE PARK FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH ATLANTA — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFernbank Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNDERWATER HYPOXIC BLACKOUT PREVENTION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA RIVER NETWORK INC dba GEORGIA RIVERS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetATLANTA MEMORIAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLONGUE VUE HOUSE & GARDENS — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORMAN SCHOOL INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEACHTREE BATTLE ALLIANCE INC — $278 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH CENTER INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta IncGA32.1× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Norman Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · The Zeist Foundation Inc · The Waterfall Foundation Inc · The Imlay Foundation Inc · The Klamon Family Foundation Inc · The Medlin-Hale Foundation Inc · Tull Charitable Foundation Inc · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Georgiainc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lubo Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 119 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph