Skip to content
Lpr Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Lpr Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$538k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$2.0MHuman Services$798kEducation$342kRecreation & Sports$224kReligion$119kYouth Development$108kPhilanthropy$104kArts & Culture$63kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $83k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $450k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$200,000
PROJECT ZERO$150,000
ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$100,000
PARK$30,000
UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS$20,000
UAMS FOUNDATION FUND$13,000
ARKANSAS MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS$10,000
PULASKI HEIGHTS UNITED METHODIST$10,000
ARKANSAS STATE GOLF ASSOCIATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $831k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%THE BRANDON BURLSWORTH FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%THE BRANDON BURLSWORTH FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%THEA FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%THEA FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%THEA FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%PARK FOUNDATION: $15k → 17%PARK FOUNDATION: $8k → 17%PARK FOUNDATION: $8k → 17%PARK FOUNDATION: $8k → 17%PARK FOUNDATION: $8k → 17%IMMERSE ARKANSAS: $50k → 17%WORLD SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 17%PROJECT ZERO: $150k → 17%PROJECT ZERO: $150k → 17%PROJECT ZERO: $150k → 17%PROJECT ZERO: $150k → 17%PROJECT ZERO: $30k → 17%PROJECT ZERO: $19k → 17%PROJECT ZERO: $15k → 17%PROJECT ZERO: $15k → 17%PROJECT ZERO: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.3M · 25 repeat orgs$468k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against -7% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
22

Total granted

$3.3M
$343k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
-7%

Still filing today

52%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $125k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +54%
  • PC
    PULASKI COUNTY ADOPTION COALITION INC DBA PROJECT ZERO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $694k · revenue +157%
  • EC
    EPISCOPAL COLLEGIATE SCHOOL
    3× · 2022–2024 · $86k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • BF
    BPS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%
  • PC
    PURE CHARITY
    one grant, 2020 · $52k
  • IA
    IMMERSE ARKANSAS
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Foundation of the Arkansas Sports Hall of Fame

To honor the legacy of Arkansas sports history

Arts & Culture
2
Arkansas Bankers Association Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Arkansas Foundation for the Blind and Visually Impaired

The foundation's mission is to broaden and enhance educational and employment opportunities for persons with visual impairments.

Education
4
Foundation for Arkansas Heritage and History Inc

The Foundation for Arkansas Heritage and History was established to help further the mission of the Division of Arkansas Heritage; to identify Arkansass Heritage and enhance the quality of life by the discovery,preservation and…

Arts & Culture
5
Arkansas Sports Hall of Fame Inc

The selection, recognition, and acknowledgement of those who throughout outstanding achievement in any form of sport have brought honor and prestige to Arkansas

Arts & Culture
6
Arkansas Tennis Association Inc

To promote and develop the growth of tennis.

—
7
Parks and Recreation Foundation of Arkansas

Parks and Recreation Foundation of Arkansas is organized to support, protect, enhance and add value to places that provide exceptional recreation experience and build on the legacy of the civilian conservation corps by providing a conduit…

Recreation & Sports
8
Arkansas Pharmacy Foundation

Promote profession of pharmacy in the state of arkansas.

Health
9
Acc Capital Foundation

The organization promotes educational activities which foster entrepreneurial development in arkansas with the goal of increasing business startup creation and leadership development.

Unclassified
10
Arkansans for Education Reform Foundation
Education
11
Arkansas Farm Bureau Foundation

Arkansas farm bureau foundation (the "foundation") is organized for charitable and educational purposes to further the understanding of agricultural and rural issues, and to support the agricultural and rural community through financial…

Food & Nutrition
12
Arkansas Foundation for Medical Care Inc

To promote excellence in health care through evaluation and education

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Arkansas Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bps Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/29
Grantees still filing
15/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $1,363,771 · HealthARKANSAS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATIONARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $100,000 · HealthARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL+3 more: $60,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $400,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODEPISCOPAL COLLEGIATE FOUNDATION: $108,500 · OtherEPISCOPAL COLLEGIATE FOUNDATIONPULASKI HEIGHTS UNITED METHODIST: $102,500 · OtherPULASKI HEIGHTS UNITED METHODISTBPS FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherBPS FOUNDATIONPARK: $95,613 · OtherPARKUAMS - THE ORTHOPAEDIC & SPINE HOSPITAL: $66,000 · OtherUAMS - THE ORTHOPAEDIC & SPINE HOSP…PURE CHARITY: $51,500 · Other+22 more: $275,747 · Other+22 morePULASKI COUNTY ADOPTION COALITION INC DBA PROJECT ZERO: $693,500 · Human ServicesPULASKI COUNTY ADOPTION …IMMERSE ARKANSAS: $50,000 · Human ServicesIMMERSE ARKANSASPARK Foundation Inc: $45,000 · Human ServicesPARK Foundation IncTHEA FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Human Services+3 more: $14,000 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC: $89,000 · EducationEPISCOPAL COLLEGIATE SCHOOL: $86,000 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationARKANSAS REPERTORY THEATRE: $13,250 · Arts & CultureARKANSAS MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Arts & CultureHISTORIC ARKANSAS MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Arts & CultureARKANSAS TENNIS PATRONS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsGERMANTOWN CHARITY HORSE SHOW: $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE HAT CLUB: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Health$1,523,771Other$1,199,860Human Services$832,500Education$180,000Arts & Culture$28,250Recreation & Sports$10,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetARKANSAS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $1,363,771 over 9y, 5.1% of budgetPULASKI COUNTY ADOPTION COALITION INC DBA PROJECT ZERO: $693,500 over 9y, 25% of budgetARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBPS FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC: $89,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEPISCOPAL COLLEGIATE SCHOOL: $86,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetIMMERSE ARKANSAS: $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPARK Foundation Inc: $45,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetTHEA FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetBaptist Health Foundation Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetACCESS INC: $25,900 over 6y, 15% of budgetOUR HOUSE INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF ARKANSAS & NORTH LOUISIANA INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetARKANSAS REPERTORY THEATRE: $13,250 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBRANDON BURLSWORTH FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetARKANSAS HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetARKANSAS MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGERMANTOWN CHARITY HORSE SHOW: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHISTORIC ARKANSAS MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetNATURAL STATE COUNCIL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOMENS FOUNDATION OF ARKANSAS: $5,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetWORLD SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOZARK MISSION PROJECT INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ROTARY CLUB 99 FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWOMEN & CHILDREN FIRST THE CENTER AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PULASKI COUNTY ADOPTION COALITION INC DBA PROJECT ZERO ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds BPS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EPISCOPAL COLLEGIATE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds IMMERSE ARKANSAS ↗
  • Who funds PARK Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THEA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Baptist Health Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS INC ↗
  • Who funds OUR HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF ARKANSAS & NORTH LOUISIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS REPERTORY THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds BRANDON BURLSWORTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS TENNIS PATRONS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GERMANTOWN CHARITY HORSE SHOW ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS MOCK TRIAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC ARKANSAS MUSEUM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE HAT CLUB ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL STATE COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS STATE GOLF ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arkansas Community Fo…Riggs Benevolent FundArvest FoundationThe Hussman FoundationRoy and Christine Stu…Windgate Charitable F…Delta Dental Plan of …Nabholz Charitable Fo…Brown FoundationBass Family Charitabl…Trinity FoundationGeorge H Dunklin Jr C…
Arkansas Community Foundation IncAR36× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Riggs Benevolent Fund · Arvest Foundation · The Hussman Foundation · Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable And · Windgate Charitable Foundation Inc · Delta Dental Plan of Arkansas Inc · Nabholz Charitable Foundation · Brown Foundation · Bass Family Charitable Foundation · Trinity Foundation · George H Dunklin Jr Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lpr Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lpr Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lpr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home