Skip to content
Loyola University Medical Center at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Loyola University Medical Center

We, loyola university health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.lumc is a member of loyola university health system and trinity health.

$30M
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$235MHealth$3.6MHuman Services$415kYouth Development$172kHousing & Shelter$94kCivil Rights$75kInternational$28kCommunity Improvement$18k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$29,893,248
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.6B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO$29,893,248
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RONALD MCDONALD CHARITIES: $5k → 7%COALITION FOR SPRITUAL AND PUBLIC LEADERSHIP: $75k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
MI
IN
PA
CO
NE
MD
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$239M · 9 repeat orgs$287k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
16

Total granted

$239M
$287k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+43%

Still filing today

89%
81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LU
    LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $235M · revenue +39%
  • IH
    ILLINOIS HEALTH AND HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2019–2021 · $2.2M · revenue +16%
  • IT
    ILLINOIS TRANSPLANT FUND
    5× · 2018–2024 · $800k · revenue +463% · 97% of their budget

Funded once

  • YC
    YOUTH CROSSROADS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue +183%
  • CF
    COALITION FOR SPIRITUAL & PUBLIC LDRSHPgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue +60%
  • CU
    Creighton Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +56%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana University Health Care Associates Inc

To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…

Health
2
Loyola University Medical Center

We, loyola university health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.lumc is a member of loyola university health system and trinity…

Health
3
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
4
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
5
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
6
Loyola University Health System

We, loyola university health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.loyola university health system is a member of trinity health.

Health
7
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
8
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
9
Indiana University Health Jay Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
10
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
11
Indiana University Health Ball Memorial Physicians Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
12
Indiana University Health North Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Illinois Health and Hospital Association; the most unlike its peers is Strengthening Proviso Youth-Nfp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $235,125,437 · EducationLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO+2 more: $28,000 · EducationILLINOIS HEALTH AND HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $2,151,331 · OtherTHE WEST COOK YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONS INC: $230,400 · OtherST EULALIA CHURCH: $169,250 · OtherSTRENGTHENING PROVISO YOUTH-NFP: $96,758 · Other+6 more: $129,080 · OtherILLINOIS TRANSPLANT FUND: $800,000 · PhilanthropyAmerican Heart Association Inc: $540,000 · HealthPublic Health Institute of Metropolitan Chicago: $78,237 · Health+5 more: $32,600 · HealthHOUSING FORWARD: $93,804 · Housing & ShelterCOALITION FOR SPIRITUAL & PUBLIC LDRSHP: $75,000 · Human ServicesRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CHICAGOLAND & NW INDIANA: $5,000 · Human ServicesIFF: $17,500 · Community Improvement
Education$235,153,437Other$2,776,819Philanthropy$800,000Health$650,837Housing & Shelter$93,804Human Services$80,000Community Improvement$17,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $235,125,437 over 9y, 3.1% of budgetILLINOIS HEALTH AND HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $2,151,331 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetILLINOIS TRANSPLANT FUND: $800,000 over 5y, 97% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $540,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WEST COOK YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONS INC: $230,400 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetSTRENGTHENING PROVISO YOUTH-NFP: $96,758 over 2y, 48% of budgetHOUSING FORWARD: $93,804 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetPublic Health Institute of Metropolitan Chicago: $78,237 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetYOUTH CROSSROADS INC: $75,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetCOALITION FOR SPIRITUAL & PUBLIC LDRSHP: $75,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetCreighton University: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIFF: $17,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANITY FIRST USA: $16,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDWEST NURSING RESEARCH SOCIETY: $8,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetAmerican Liver Foundation: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGOTTLIEB MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $5,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALIVIO MEDICAL CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CHICAGOLAND & NW INDIANA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRML Health Providers Limited Partnership: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Metropo…The Chicago Community…Healthy Communities F…John D and Catherine …Oak Park-River Forest…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
United Way of Metropolitan Chicago IncIL19.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · Healthy Communities Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Oak Park-River Forest Community Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Loyola University Medical Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Loyola University Medical Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Loyola University Medical Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home