Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Loyola University Medical Center

We, loyola university health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.lumc is a member of loyola university health system and trinity health.

$30M
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$235MHealth$3.6MHuman Services$415kYouth Development$172kHousing & Shelter$94kCivil Rights$75kInternational$28kCommunity Improvement$18k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$29,893,248
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.6B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO$29,893,248
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RONALD MCDONALD CHARITIES: $5k → 7%COALITION FOR SPRITUAL AND PUBLIC LEADERSHIP: $75k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
IL
MI
IN
PA
CO
NE
MD
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$239M · 9 repeat orgs$287k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
16

Total granted

$239M
$287k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+43%

Still filing today

89%
81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LU
    LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $235M · revenue +39%
  • IT
    ILLINOIS TRANSPLANT FUND
    5× · 2018–2024 · $800k · revenue +463% · 97% of their budget
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    5× · 2018–2023 · $540k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • CF
    COALITION FOR SPIRITUAL & PUBLIC LDRSHPgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue +60%
  • YC
    YOUTH CROSSROADS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue +183%
  • CU
    Creighton Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +56%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Loyola University Medical Center

We, loyola university health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.lumc is a member of loyola university health system and trinity…

Health
2
Loyola University Health System

We, loyola university health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.loyola university health system is a member of trinity health.

Health
3
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

4
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
5
Indiana University Health Care Associates Inc

To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…

Health
6
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
7
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
8
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
9
Mchc Chicago Hospital Council

The mission of mchc chicago hospital council is to foster, promote, support, develop and encourage charitable, educational, scholastic and scientific purposes; promote cooperative effort and action between hospitals and other health care…

Health
10
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

11
Indiana University Health Jay Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
12
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Illinois Health and Hospital Association and the most unlike its peers is Strengthening Proviso Youth-Nfp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Ymca Community CentersAt-Risk Youth MentoringHomeless Services & ShelterSmall Business Development …Community Health CentersSouth Asian Cultural and Sp…Cancer Support Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr13%5%5–10yr18%9%10–20yr15%32%20–35yr14%18%35–55yr22%36%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr18%99%10–20yr15%0%20–35yr14%0%35–55yr22%1%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
12%
8,891/72,334

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO — $235,125,437 · EducationLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO+2 more — $28,000 · EducationILLINOIS HEALTH AND HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION — $2,151,331 · OtherTHE WEST COOK YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONS INC — $230,400 · OtherST EULALIA CHURCH — $169,250 · OtherSTRENGTHENING PROVISO YOUTH-NFP — $96,758 · Other+6 more — $129,080 · OtherILLINOIS TRANSPLANT FUND — $800,000 · PhilanthropyAmerican Heart Association Inc — $540,000 · HealthPublic Health Institute of Metropolitan Chicago — $78,237 · Health+5 more — $32,600 · HealthHOUSING FORWARD — $93,804 · Housing & ShelterCOALITION FOR SPIRITUAL & PUBLIC LDRSHP — $75,000 · Human ServicesRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CHICAGOLAND & NW INDIANA — $5,000 · Human ServicesIFF — $17,500 · Community Improvement
Education$235,153,437Other$2,776,819Philanthropy$800,000Health$650,837Housing & Shelter$93,804Human Services$80,000Community Improvement$17,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO — $235,125,437 over 9y, 3.1% of budgetILLINOIS HEALTH AND HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION — $2,151,331 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetILLINOIS TRANSPLANT FUND — $800,000 over 5y, 97% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $540,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WEST COOK YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONS INC — $230,400 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetSTRENGTHENING PROVISO YOUTH-NFP — $96,758 over 2y, 48% of budgetHOUSING FORWARD — $93,804 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetPublic Health Institute of Metropolitan Chicago — $78,237 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOALITION FOR SPIRITUAL & PUBLIC LDRSHP — $75,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetYOUTH CROSSROADS INC — $75,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetCreighton University — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIFF — $17,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANITY FIRST USA — $16,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC — $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDWEST NURSING RESEARCH SOCIETY — $8,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetAmerican Liver Foundation — $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGOTTLIEB MEMORIAL HOSPITAL — $5,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRML Health Providers Limited Partnership — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALIVIO MEDICAL CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CHICAGOLAND & NW INDIANA — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Metropolitan Chicago IncIL19.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · Healthy Communities Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Oak Park-River Forest Community Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Loyola University Medical Center funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph