Skip to content

· Private foundation

Louis L Manes Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$21k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$28kReligion$12kHealth$9kRecreation & Sports$7kHuman Services$4kPhilanthropy$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kEducation$850Other$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$400
Median grant
8
States reached
$418k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BETH EL CONGREGATION$5,350
Individual grant recipient$2,000
BLACK MOUNTAIN COLLEGE MUSEUM AND ARTS CENTER$2,000
ASHEVILLE COMMUNITY THEATRE$1,300
GATEWAY COMMUNITY CHURCH$1,000
BAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION$1,000
TEMPLE ISRAEL$1,000
THE SMITH CENTER$1,000
YMCA$915
SHAW JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$750
Individual grant recipient$600
ASHEVILLE ART MUSEUM$500
ASHEVILLE SYMPHONY$400
JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY$350
FRIENDS OF THE SUMMIT$340
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%JOANNA HOUSE II: $300 → 13%LINKS COMMUNITY & FAMILY SERVICES: $200 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NV
OH
MD
AZ
NC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$46k · 21 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
20

Total granted

$46k
$8k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 13% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesPublic BenefitFood & NutritionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BM
    Black Mountain College Museum
    5× · 2017–2024 · $10k
  • MP
    Menorah Park Foundation
    4× · 2017–2022 · $6k
  • BH
    Bethesda Hospital Foundation
    5× · 2017–2024 · $5k

Funded once

  • ML
    Morse Life Foundation
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • SC
    Smith Center for Performing Arts
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • ML
    Morris Life Health System
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cleveland Museum of Art

The mission of the cleveland museum of art (cma) is to fulfill its dual roles as one of the world's most distinguished comprehensive art museums and as one of northeastern ohio's principal civic and cultural institutions. the museum,…

Arts & Culture
2
Manhattan School of Music

Manhattan school of music is deeply committed to excellence in education, performance, and creative activity; to the humanity of the school's environment; and to the cultural enrichment of the larger community. a premiere international…

Arts & Culture
3
Roanoke Symphony Orchestra

The Roanoke Symphony Orchestra provides a professional symphony orchestra of artistic excellence and integrity to enrich lives, to educate, and to entertain diverse audiences in western Virginia with the highest quality instrumental and…

Arts & Culture
4
Artis-Naples Inc

Please refer to schedule o for the organization's complete mission statement.

Arts & Culture
5
Munson-Williams-Proctor Arts Institute

Munson-williams-proctor arts institute (mwpai) is a fine arts center dedicated to serving diverse audiences by advancing the appreciation, understanding, and enjoyment of the arts. the art institute aims to promote interest and…

Arts & Culture
6
Amda Inc (American Musical and Dramatic Academy)

Amda is committed to providing an unsurpassed performing arts education to a diverse community of creative artists. amda seeks to be both the school and the stage, where students are given the support and the freedom to find their voice…

—
7
Baltimore Museum of Art

The baltimore museum of art connects art to baltimore and baltimore to the world, embodying a commitment to artistic excellence and social equity in every decision from art presentation, interpretation, and collecting, to the composition…

Arts & Culture
8
Annapolis Symphony Orchestra Inc

The mission of the annapolis symphony orchestra is to inspire, educate and enrich lives near and far by creating extraordinary musical experiences with uncompromising artistic excellence.

Arts & Culture
9
Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc

The mission of the Boston Symphony Orchestra (BSO) is to foster and maintain an organization dedicated to making music consonant with the highest aspirations of the musical art, creating performances and providing educational and training…

Arts & Culture
10
The Musical Arts Association

The Cleveland Orchestra inspires and enriches lives by creating extraordinary musical experiences at the highest level of artistic excellence.

Arts & Culture
11
Charleston Symphony Orchestra

The charleston symphony's mission is to inspire and engage the community through exceptional musical performances and educational programs.

Arts & Culture
12
Charleston Academy of Music

The Charleston Academy of Music is committed to providing access to exceptional music education, performance and community outreach to all, regardless of age, skill, gender, ethnicity or income.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Asheville Art Museum Association Inc; the most unlike its peers is Joanna House Ii Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
5/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Black Mountain College Museum: $10,000 · OtherBlack Mountain College MuseumMenorah Park Foundation: $6,330 · OtherMenorah Park FoundationBETH EL CONGREGATION: $5,350 · OtherBETH EL CONGREGATIONBethesda Hospital Foundation: $5,300 · OtherBethesda Hospital FoundationAsheville Area Arts Council: $3,000 · OtherAngel Foundation: $3,000 · OtherShaw JCC of Akron: $2,700 · Other+44 more: $29,570 · Other+44 moreBLACK MOUNTAIN COLLEGE MUSEUM AND ARTS CENTER INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureASHEVILLE COMMUNITY THEATRE INC: $1,300 · Arts & CultureThe Smith Center for the Performing Arts: $1,000 · Arts & CultureAsheville Art Museum Association Inc: $500 · Arts & CultureAsheville Symphony Society Inc: $400 · Arts & CultureMUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM: $250 · Arts & CultureJOANNA HOUSE II INC: $300 · Human ServicesLINKS COMMUNITY & FAMILY SERVICES: $200 · Human ServicesJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $350 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF THE SUMMIT: $340 · Public BenefitBOCA HELPING HANDS INC: $300 · Food & NutritionGOUCHER COLLEGE: $100 · Education
Other$65,250Arts & Culture$5,450Human Services$500Philanthropy$350Public Benefit$340Food & Nutrition$300Education$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Smith Center for the Performing Arts: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAsheville Art Museum Association Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAsheville Symphony Society Inc: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE SUMMIT: $340 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGOUCHER COLLEGE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLACK MOUNTAIN COLLEGE MUSEUM AND ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ASHEVILLE COMMUNITY THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Smith Center for the Performing Arts ↗
  • Who funds Asheville Art Museum Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds Asheville Symphony Society Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Asheville Area Arts CouncilNC13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Asheville Area Arts Council · Akron Community Foundation · The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Louis L Manes Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Louis L Manes Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Goucher College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Louis L Manes’ filings →

More from the funding graph