Skip to content

· Private foundation

Louis and Helen Padnos Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$496k
Granted FY2026still arriving
21
Grants FY2026still arriving
3
States reached
$160k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$855kHealth$234kInternational$125kHuman Services$104kArts & Culture$98kEnvironment$65kReligion$62kYouth Development$37kOther$0
02FY2026 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k8 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $205k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $260k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GRAND RAPIDS$160,000
ODC NETWORK$50,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SOROKA MEDICAL CENTER INC$50,000
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FUND OF MICHIGAN$36,000
SECURE COMMUNITIES NETWORK INC$36,000
COMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE$25,000
DWELLING PLACE OF GRAND RAPIDS INC$25,000
READY FOR SCHOOL$20,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WEST MICHIGAN$20,000
SAUGATUCK CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC$12,500
ARBOR CIRCLE$10,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER HOLLAND$10,000
FREDERICK MEIJER GARDENS$10,000
GRAND RAPIDS ART MUSEUM$7,500
Individual grant recipient$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–26, $92k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RESILIANCE ADVOCATES FOR ENDING VIOLENCE: $5k → 8%Center for Women in Transition: $5k → 8%Arbor Circle: $10k → 11%CENTER FOR WOMEN IN TRANSITION: $5k → 8%Resilience Advocates for Ending Violence: $5k → 8%ARBOR CIRCLE: $10k → 11%Resilience Advocates for Ending Violence: $5k → 8%Arbor Circle: $10k → 11%Family Hope Foundation: $7k → 8%ARBOR CIRCLE: $10k → 11%Arbor Circle: $5k → 11%ARBOR CIRCLE: $3k → 11%YWCA West Central Michigan: $12k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$957k · 27 repeat orgs$513k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2026, 14 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
23

Total granted

$957k
$312k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+31%

Still filing today

59%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $201k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEducationAnimalsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE
    4× · 2021–2026 · $67k · revenue +103%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN
    3× · 2019–2024 · $55k · revenue +39%
  • TA
    THE ARBOR CIRCLE CORPORATION
    6× · 2019–2026 · $48k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • HC
    Holland Community Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • TE
    TEMPLE EMANU-EL
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HOLLAND-ZEELAND
    one grant, 2025 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Chamber of Commerce

To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.

—
2
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

—
3
Michigan Assoc of Community Mental Health Boards

Assisting the community mental health boards of michigan in developing methods for mental health planning, care and treatment.

—
4
Michigan Farmers Market Association

Mifma supports the viability of all community-driven marketplaces so that they can connect all consumers to local farms and businesses.

Food & Nutrition
5
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
6
Michigan Pharmacists Association

To encourage and support its members as professionals responsible for the delivery of patient-focused care.

—
7
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
8
Saginaw County Chamber of Commerce

To be a catalyst for economic and community progress within the great lakes bay region.

—
9
Michigan Enviromental Council

Informing and educating the public and decision makers about environmental issues.

Environment
10
Area Agency On Aging of Western Michigan Inc

Through internal expertise, external partnerships, and advocacy, the area agency on aging of western michigan provides older adults, adults with disabilities, and their caregivers equitable access to services that promote independence and…

Human Services
11
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
12
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ywca West Central Michigan; the most unlike its peers is New Israel Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
21/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF GRAND RAPIDS: $634,500 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF GRAND RAPIDSJewish Foundation of Grand Rapids: $230,000 · OtherJewish Foundation of Grand RapidsCOMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE: $67,250 · OtherPlanned Parenthood of MI: $60,000 · Other+35 more: $686,060 · Other+35 moreNEW ISRAEL FUND: $125,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SOROKA MEDICAL CENTER INC: $50,000 · InternationalGRAND RAPIDS ART MUSEUM: $42,500 · Arts & CultureHolland Community Aquatic Center Foundation: $16,666 · Arts & CultureSAUGATUCK CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $16,500 · Arts & CultureLANSING SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $6,250 · Arts & CultureHOLLAND SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $5,500 · Arts & CultureHOLLAND AREA ARTS COUNCIL: $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE ARBOR CIRCLE CORPORATION: $48,000 · Human ServicesRESILIENCE ADVOCATES FOR ENDING VIOLENCE: $25,000 · Human ServicesYWCA WEST CENTRAL MICHIGAN: $12,000 · Human ServicesTHE FAMILY HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $7,145 · Human ServicesPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN: $55,000 · HealthCOREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION WEST MICHIGAN: $19,000 · Health70 X 7 LIFE RECOVERY: $10,000 · HealthODC NETWORK: $50,000 · AnimalsJOHN BALL ZOO: $20,000 · AnimalsREADY FOR SCHOOL: $36,250 · Education+2 more: $1,650 · Education
Other$1,677,810International$175,000Arts & Culture$92,416Human Services$92,145Health$84,000Animals$70,000Education$37,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GRAND RAPIDS: $634,500 over 6y, 14% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND: $125,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE: $67,250 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN: $55,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ARBOR CIRCLE CORPORATION: $48,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGRAND RAPIDS ART MUSEUM: $42,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetREADY FOR SCHOOL: $36,250 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetKIDS' FOOD BASKET INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRESILIENCE ADVOCATES FOR ENDING VIOLENCE: $25,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER HOLLAND: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJOHN BALL ZOO: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHolland Community Aquatic Center Foundation: $16,666 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetSAUGATUCK CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $16,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDA BLODGETT - ST JOHN'S: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYWCA WEST CENTRAL MICHIGAN: $12,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget70 X 7 LIFE RECOVERY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE FAMILY HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $7,145 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetLANSING SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $6,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHOLLAND SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $5,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHOLLAND AREA ARTS COUNCIL: $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMichigan Colleges Alliance: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GRAND RAPIDS ↗
  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SOROKA MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ODC NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds THE ARBOR CIRCLE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds GRAND RAPIDS ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds READY FOR SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FUND OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds KIDS' FOOD BASKET INC ↗
  • Who funds DWELLING PLACE OF GRAND RAPIDS NONPROFIT ↗
  • Who funds RESILIENCE ADVOCATES FOR ENDING VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER HOLLAND ↗
  • Who funds JOHN BALL ZOO ↗
  • Who funds COREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION WEST MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds Holland Community Aquatic Center Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SAUGATUCK CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds DA BLODGETT - ST JOHN'S ↗
  • Who funds YWCA WEST CENTRAL MICHIGAN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area IncMI34.3× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Inc · Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Howard Miller Foundation · Frey Foundation · Dick and Betsy Devos Family Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Heart of West Michigan United Way · Grand Haven Area Community Foundation Inc · Jim and Ginger Jurries Foundation · Douglas & Sandra Dekock Family Foun · Greater Ottawa County United Way · Larry and Karen Mulder Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Louis and Helen Padnos Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Louis and Helen Padnos Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Louis and Helen Padnos Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Louis and Helen Padnos Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Louis and Helen Padnos’ filings →

    More from the funding graph