Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Louis and Helen Padnos Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$186k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What you fund
0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$855kHealth$234kInternational$125kHuman Services$104kArts & Culture$98kEnvironment$65kReligion$62kYouth Development$37kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $130k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GRAND RAPIDS$80,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HOLLAND-ZEELAND$50,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WEST MICHIGAN$20,000
ARBOR CIRCLE$10,000
GRAND RAPIDS ART MUSEUM$7,500
COMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE$6,250
Individual grant recipient$5,000
GRAND RAPIDS SYMPHONY$3,750
HOLLAND EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$2,500
LANSING SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$1,250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $77k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Resilience Advocates for Ending Violence: $5k → 8%Center for Women in Transition: $5k → 8%CENTER FOR WOMEN IN TRANSITION: $5k → 8%Resilience Advocates for Ending Violence: $5k → 8%Arbor Circle: $10k → 11%Arbor Circle: $10k → 11%Family Hope Foundation: $7k → 8%ARBOR CIRCLE: $10k → 11%Arbor Circle: $5k → 11%ARBOR CIRCLE: $3k → 11%YWCA West Central Michigan: $12k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$780k · 22 repeat orgs$353k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
25

Total granted

$780k
$281k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+33%

Still filing today

59%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $73k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN
    3× · 2019–2024 · $55k · revenue +39%
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE
    3× · 2021–2025 · $42k · revenue +103%
  • TA
    THE ARBOR CIRCLE CORPORATION
    5× · 2019–2025 · $38k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • CF
    Cantor-David Fair Fund
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • HC
    Holland Community Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • TE
    TEMPLE EMANU-EL
    one grant, 2019 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Chamber of Commerce

To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.

2
Mid Michigan Community Action Agency Inc

Mid michigan community action guides local residents on the path to self-sufficiency through empowerment, education and community enrichment.

3
Saginaw County Chamber of Commerce

To be a catalyst for economic and community progress within the great lakes bay region.

4
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

5
Michigan Assoc of Community Mental Health Boards

Assisting the community mental health boards of michigan in developing methods for mental health planning, care and treatment.

6
Michigan Farmers Market Association

Mifma supports the viability of all community-driven marketplaces so that they can connect all consumers to local farms and businesses.

Food & Nutrition
7
Area Agency On Aging of Western Michigan Inc

Through internal expertise, external partnerships, and advocacy, the area agency on aging of western michigan provides older adults, adults with disabilities, and their caregivers equitable access to services that promote independence and…

Human Services
8
Michigan Pharmacists Association

To encourage and support its members as professionals responsible for the delivery of patient-focused care.

9
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
10
Great Lakes Center for the Arts

The Center's mission is to inspire, entertain, educate, and serve all in Northern Michigan year-round by presenting exceptional experiences across the full spectrum of the performing arts and offering impactful educational opportunities.

Arts & Culture
11
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
12
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ywca West Central Michigan and the most unlike its peers is New Israel Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr21%26%10–20yr17%13%20–35yr16%26%35–55yr13%35%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr21%10%10–20yr17%9%20–35yr16%20%35–55yr13%61%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
10%
536/5,610

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF GRAND RAPIDS — $474,500 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF GRAND RAPIDSJewish Foundation of Grand Rapids — $230,000 · OtherJewish Foundation of Grand RapidsPlanned Parenthood of MI — $60,000 · OtherCantor-David Fair Fund — $50,000 · OtherHolland Community Foundation — $50,000 · OtherTEMPLE EMANU-EL — $50,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HOLLAND-ZEELAND — $50,000 · Other+29 more — $364,560 · Other+29 moreNEW ISRAEL FUND — $125,000 · InternationalPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN — $55,000 · HealthCOREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION WEST MICHIGAN — $19,000 · Health70 X 7 LIFE RECOVERY — $10,000 · HealthTHE ARBOR CIRCLE CORPORATION — $38,000 · Human ServicesRESILIENCE ADVOCATES FOR ENDING VIOLENCE — $20,000 · Human ServicesYWCA WEST CENTRAL MICHIGAN — $12,000 · Human ServicesTHE FAMILY HOPE FOUNDATION INC — $7,145 · Human ServicesGRAND RAPIDS ART MUSEUM — $35,000 · Arts & CultureHolland Community Aquatic Center Foundation — $16,666 · Arts & CultureHOLLAND AREA ARTS COUNCIL — $5,000 · Arts & CultureLANSING SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $5,000 · Arts & CultureSAUGATUCK CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC — $4,000 · Arts & CultureHOLLAND SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $2,500 · Arts & CultureKIDS' FOOD BASKET INC — $30,000 · Food & NutritionJOHN BALL ZOO — $20,000 · Animals
Other$1,329,060International$125,000Health$84,000Human Services$77,145Arts & Culture$68,166Food & Nutrition$30,000Animals$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GRAND RAPIDS — $474,500 over 5y, 14% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND — $125,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN — $55,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE — $42,250 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ARBOR CIRCLE CORPORATION — $38,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGRAND RAPIDS ART MUSEUM — $35,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetKIDS' FOOD BASKET INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRESILIENCE ADVOCATES FOR ENDING VIOLENCE — $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetJOHN BALL ZOO — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHolland Community Aquatic Center Foundation — $16,666 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetREADY FOR SCHOOL — $16,250 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetDA BLODGETT - ST JOHN'S — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYWCA WEST CENTRAL MICHIGAN — $12,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER HOLLAND — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget70 X 7 LIFE RECOVERY — $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE FAMILY HOPE FOUNDATION INC — $7,145 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetHOLLAND AREA ARTS COUNCIL — $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetLANSING SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $5,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSAUGATUCK CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOLLAND SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMichigan Colleges Alliance — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GRAND RAPIDS
  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE
  • Who funds THE ARBOR CIRCLE CORPORATION
  • Who funds GRAND RAPIDS ART MUSEUM
  • Who funds KIDS' FOOD BASKET INC
  • Who funds RESILIENCE ADVOCATES FOR ENDING VIOLENCE
  • Who funds JOHN BALL ZOO
  • Who funds COREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION WEST MICHIGAN
  • Who funds Holland Community Aquatic Center Foundation
  • Who funds READY FOR SCHOOL
  • Who funds DA BLODGETT - ST JOHN'S
  • Who funds YWCA WEST CENTRAL MICHIGAN
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER HOLLAND
  • Who funds 70 X 7 LIFE RECOVERY
  • Who funds THE FAMILY HOPE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds HOLLAND AREA ARTS COUNCIL
  • Who funds LANSING SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area IncMI34.3× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Inc · Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Howard Miller Foundation · Frey Foundation · Dick and Betsy Devos Family Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Heart of West Michigan United Way · Grand Haven Area Community Foundation Inc · Jim and Ginger Jurries Foundation · Douglas & Sandra Dekock Family Foun · Greater Ottawa County United Way · Larry and Karen Mulder Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Louis and Helen Padnos Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Louis and Helen Padnos Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Louis and Helen Padnos Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph