Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lost Pond Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$255k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Philanthropy$1.3MHealth$1.1MYouth Development$625kHuman Services$608kEducation$483kEnvironment$456kFood & Nutrition$300kReligion$197kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $178k
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.5M
  • $250k+1 grant · $255k
$50,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$36M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Indiana University Foundation$255,000
The Nature Conservancy$200,000
Breakthrough T1D (FKA JDRF)$175,000
Catholic Charities - Diocese of Joliet$155,000
By the Hand Club for Kids$150,000
Alzheimer's Association$150,000
Doctors without Borders$100,000
Brilliant Cities To Support Expansion Into Chicago$100,000
Donald Danforth Plant Science Center$100,000
Northern Illinois Food Bank$75,000
The Thresholds Homeless Outreach Program (Hop)$75,000
Cristo Rey Network$75,000
St Alphonsus Parish$75,000
Northwestern Medicine$55,000
Chicago Commons$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Chicago Commons: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
CA
MO
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 22 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
13

Total granted

$2.5M
$277k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+22%

Still filing today

50%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $875k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationFood & NutritionArts & CultureEnvironmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Indiana University Foundation
    3× · 2023–2025 · $395k · revenue +41%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF JOLIET
    3× · 2023–2025 · $390k · revenue +35%
  • GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $55k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1Dgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue +35%
  • BRILLIANT DETROIT
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF BERRIEN COUNTY TRAILS
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -83%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
3
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
4
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
5
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
6
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
7
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
8
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
9
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
10
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
11
International Food Information Council

To effectively communicate science based information on food safety, nutrition, and health for the public good.

Arts & Culture
12
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Candor Health Education; the most unlike its peers is Elementry School District No 181 Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
18/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

By The Hand Club For Kids: $525,000 · OtherBy The Hand Club For KidsTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $424,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF JOLIET: $390,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF JOLIETBreakthrough T1D (FKA JDRF): $350,000 · OtherBreakthrough T1D (FKA JDRF)Alzheimer's Association: $350,000 · OtherAlzheimer's AssociationBrilliant Cities To Support Expansion Into Chicago: $100,000 · OtherBRILLIANT DETROIT: $100,000 · Other+26 more: $719,100 · Other+26 moreFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $1,293,138 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARIT…Indiana University Foundation: $395,000 · EducationIndiana Un…CRISTO REY NETWORK: $75,000 · EducationCRISTO REY…+2 more: $11,000 · EducationBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $150,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $150,000 · HealthWellness House: $20,000 · HealthCANDOR HEALTH EDUCATION: $15,000 · Health+2 more: $6,000 · HealthNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $75,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $55,000 · Food & NutritionDONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER: $100,000 · Science & TechMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $100,000 · International
Other$2,958,100Community Improvement$1,293,138Education$481,000Health$341,000Food & Nutrition$130,000Science & Tech$100,000International$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $1,293,138 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBy The Hand Club For Kids: $525,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $424,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIndiana University Foundation: $395,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF JOLIET: $390,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRILLIANT DETROIT: $100,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRISTO REY NETWORK: $75,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $55,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ADLER PLANETARIUM: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetChicago Commons Association: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHIKAMING OPEN LANDS: $30,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetWellness House: $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCANDOR HEALTH EDUCATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetUNITING VOICES: $13,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetElementry School District No 181 Foundation: $10,000 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CHICAGOLAND WEST: $5,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF BERRIEN COUNTY TRAILS: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHINSDALE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION OF SMALL FOUNDATIONS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds By The Hand Club For Kids ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF JOLIET ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds BRILLIANT DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds CRISTO REY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds THE ADLER PLANETARIUM ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Commons Association ↗
  • Who funds CHIKAMING OPEN LANDS ↗
  • Who funds Wellness House ↗
  • Who funds CANDOR HEALTH EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITING VOICES ↗
  • Who funds Elementry School District No 181 Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CHICAGOLAND WEST ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BERRIEN COUNTY TRAILS ↗
  • Who funds HINSDALE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baird Foundation IncWI11.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lost Pond Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lost Pond Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lost Pond’s filings →

    More from the funding graph