Skip to content

· Private foundation

Loretto a Langley Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$157k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$495kEducation$305kHealth$118kRecreation & Sports$79kHousing & Shelter$77kPhilanthropy$73kFood & Nutrition$72kCivil Rights$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $107k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$28,835
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OLPE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT$50,000
SHILOH HOUSE$35,000
ST JOSEPH'S CATHOLIC CHURCH$28,835
ABUNDANT HARVEST FOOD KITCHEN$20,000
SACRED HEART SCHOOL$12,698
HETLINGER DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES IN$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%KANSAS CHILDREN'S SERVICE LEAGUE: $5k → 16%KANSAS CHILDREN'S SERVICE LEAGUE: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$847k · 11 repeat orgs$233k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
9

Total granted

$847k
$138k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
0%

Still filing today

9%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCH
    5× · 2019–2023 · $280k
  • SH
    SACRED HEART SCHOOL
    3× · 2017–2025 · $120k
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH'S CATHOLIC CHURCH
    2× · 2024–2025 · $104k

Funded once

  • NR
    NEWMAN REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $45k
  • CC
    CHASE COUNTY OLD SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT INC
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • ER
    EMPORIA RESCUE MISSION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -83%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Eastgate Plaza Inc

Provide low income, multi family housing under sec. 8 of the national housing act.

—
2
Habitat for Humanity of Nodaway County Inc

Provide affordable housing to low-income families

Housing & Shelter
3
Volunteer Kansas Inc

To promote volunteerism and grant opportunties in the state of kansas

Arts & Culture
4
Foster Kids Kc

The organization will provide benevolent support to children in need.

Human Services
5
Eldon Community Food Pantry

To provide food and other support to the needy of the City of Eldon and Miller County Missouri.

Food & Nutrition
6
Urban League of Kansas Inc

To facilitate economic self-reliance and an improved quality of life for urban league of kansas clients through education, empowerment and self-respect.

Human Services
7
Kansas Children's Foundation

The kansas children's foundation is dedicated to providing resources including financial and emotional support to children and families across the state of kansas.

Health
8
East Central Kansas Area Agency On Aging

Provide services and meals to the elderly and disabled

—
9
High Plains Heritage Foundation

None

Community Improvement
10
Community Foundation of Southeast Kansas

The Community Foundation of Southeast Kansas servces the region by encouraging charitable giving benefiting the common good and the quality of life.

Philanthropy
11
Kansas Farmers Union Inc

To support members in farming

—
12
Family Promise of Greater Wichita

To empower families with children to overcome homelessness and housing insecurity through a holistic approach, community involvement, and sustainable solutions.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kansas Childrens Service League; the most unlike its peers is Olpe Community Improvement Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
4/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCH: $280,337 · OtherST JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCHSACRED HEART SCHOOL: $120,110 · OtherSACRED HEART SCHOOLST JOSEPH'S CATHOLIC CHURCH: $103,835 · OtherST JOSEPH'S CATHOLIC CHURCHDIDDE CATHOLIC CAMPUS CENTER: $98,865 · OtherDIDDE CATHOLIC CAMPUS CENTERESU FOUNDATION INC: $62,585 · OtherESU FOUNDATION INCIndividual grant recipient: $57,304 · OtherIndividual grant recipientABUNDANT HARVEST FOOD KITCHEN: $49,169 · OtherNEWMAN REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $45,000 · OtherSHILOH HOUSE: $35,000 · Other+9 more: $138,365 · Other+9 moreEMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $123,867 · EducationEMPORIA STA…Emporia Community Foundation: $72,500 · PhilanthropyOlpe Community Improvement Inc: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsEMPORIA RESCUE MISSION INC: $20,000 · Food & NutritionKANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC: $3,000 · Food & NutritionKANSAS CHILDRENS SERVICE LEAGUE: $9,000 · Human ServicesPLUMB PLACE INC DBA SOUTHWICK HOUSE: $7,193 · Housing & Shelter
Other$990,570Education$123,867Philanthropy$72,500Recreation & Sports$50,000Food & Nutrition$23,000Human Services$9,000Housing & Shelter$7,193

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $123,867 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetEmporia Community Foundation: $72,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetOlpe Community Improvement Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetEMPORIA RESCUE MISSION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetHETLINGER DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES I: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLYON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetKANSAS CHILDRENS SERVICE LEAGUE: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLUMB PLACE INC DBA SOUTHWICK HOUSE: $7,193 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE FLINT HILLS INC: $4,782 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetKANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF THE FLINT HILLS I: $3,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Emporia Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Olpe Community Improvement Inc ↗
  • Who funds EMPORIA RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds HETLINGER DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES I ↗
  • Who funds LYON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS CHILDRENS SERVICE LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds PLUMB PLACE INC DBA SOUTHWICK HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE FLINT HILLS INC ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF THE FLINT HILLS I ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Emporia Community FoundationKS22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Emporia Community Foundation · Ws & Ec Jones Testamentary Trust · The Trusler Foundation Inc · Lewis Humphreys Charitable Trust · Emil Babinger Charitable Trust · Jane & Bernard Reeble Foundation · United Way of the Flint Hills Inc · E L and Z Irene Hopkins Private Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Loretto a Langley Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Loretto a Langley Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Loretto a Langley Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Loretto a Langley Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Loretto a Langley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph