Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Trusler Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$359k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$454kHuman Services$349kRecreation & Sports$324kPhilanthropy$305kHealth$304kCommunity Improvement$299kHousing & Shelter$175kYouth Development$115kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $152k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $200k
$22,908
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLUMB PLACE$50,000
OLPE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT$50,000
EMPOIRA MAIN STREET$50,000
STRONG CITY PRESERVATION ALLIANCE$50,000
Individual grant recipient$35,000
EMPORIA SENIOR CENTER$31,585
CHASE COUNTY OLD SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT$22,908
USD 252$17,500
SYMPHONY IN THE FLINT HILLS$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
ECKAN$10,000
CROSSWINDS COUNSELING & WELLNESS$10,000
EMPORIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$3,618
UNITED WAY OF THE FLINT HILLS INC$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $219k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%NLC YOUTH ASSOCIATION: $62k → 16%NLC YOUTH ASSOCIATION: $21k → 16%CAMP WOOD YMCA: $25k → 11%CAMP WOOD YMCA: $20k → 11%CAMP YOOD YMCA: $19k → 11%CAMP YOOD YMCA: $10k → 11%NLC YOUTH ASSOCIATION: $11k → 11%EMPORIA SENIOR CENTER: $32k → 16%RESOURCE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $20k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 12% of The Trusler Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in KS; read by stated purpose it is 87% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Trusler Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7M · 20 repeat orgs$694k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
24

Total granted

$1.7M
$519k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+5%

Still filing today

60%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $174k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthCommunity ImprovementAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NY
    NLC YOUTH ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2017–2023 · $93k · revenue +47% · 25% of their budget
  • EA
    EMPORIA AREA CHAMBER FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $92k · revenue +68% · 30% of their budget
  • HD
    HETLINGER DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES I
    3× · 2020–2024 · $84k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • NR
    NEWMAN REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • EA
    EMPORIA AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE & VISITORS BUREAU
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +24%
  • OL
    OLPE LIONS CLUB
    one grant, 2022 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Cowley County Historical Society

The museum collects and preserves memorabilia of cowley county, kansas. the museum is open to the public during scheduled hours, and is staffed by a combination of volunteers and staff.

2
Community Enhancement Foundation of Plains

To combat economic and physical deterioration of Plains KS through charitable social welfare activities and economic development projects that encourage job development and population stability.

Education
3
Eastgate Plaza Inc

Provide low income, multi family housing under sec. 8 of the national housing act.

4
Chamber of Commerce

To create a positive environment for business success in the junction city ks area.

5
Lincoln County Economic Dev Foundation

To encourage and support economic development in lincoln county, kansas.

Community Improvement
6
Pittsburg Area Chamber of Commerce

Promote the Pittsburg, Kansas business community.

7
Habitat for Humanity of Nodaway County Inc

Provide affordable housing to low-income families

Housing & Shelter
8
Emporia Community Day Care Center

The center provides day care to community children between the ages of two weeks to 6 years from 6:30 am to 6:00 pm monday through friday.

9
Atchison Area Economic Development Corporation Inc

To maintain real estate for the economic development of atchison county, kansas. to provide resources and assistance for continued economic development in atchison county, kansas.

Education
10
Elk County Preservation Society Inc

Preserve historic buildings

Community Improvement
11
Morton County Historical Society Inc

Preservation of historical records and artifacts of morton county, kansas

12
Enterprise Center of Johnson County

Designed to provide high quality value-added consulting services, administrative support, and low-cost flexible facilities for start-up and growth-oriented companies that will result in positive business activity and job creation in…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Emporia Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Verdigris Valley Community Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 34. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number13%7%<5yr10%7%5–10yr14%11%10–20yr15%25%20–35yr21%29%35–55yr29%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value13%4%<5yr10%6%5–10yr14%9%10–20yr15%38%20–35yr21%26%35–55yr29%18%55yr+

The field is 13% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/30
the rest of the field
8%
16/196

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
13/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ESU FOUNDATION — $248,892 · OtherESU FOUNDATIONSymphony in the Flint Hills Inc — $225,000 · OtherSymphony in the Flint Hills IncHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL EMPORIA AREA — $125,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL EMPORIA AREASOS INC — $100,000 · OtherSOS INCIndividual grant recipient — $95,449 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHETLINGER DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES I — $84,000 · OtherUSD 284 — $80,000 · OtherEMPORIA MAIN STREET INC — $72,000 · OtherSTRONG CITY PRESERVATION ALLIANCE INC — $64,600 · Other+28 more — $633,139 · Other+28 moreEmporia Community Foundation — $252,500 · PhilanthropyEmporia Communit…EMPORIA AREA CHAMBER FOUNDATION — $91,500 · PhilanthropyEMPORIA AREA CHA…UNITED WAY OF THE FLINT HILLS INC — $52,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF TH…NLC YOUTH ASSOCIATION — $93,340 · Human ServicesNLC YOUTH…CAMP WOOD YMCA INC — $73,941 · Human ServicesCAMP WOOD…Emporia Senior Center Inc — $31,585 · Human ServicesEmporia S…RESOURCE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesRESOURCE …DRINKWATER & SCHRIVER MILL INC — $65,000 · Arts & CultureThe Pioneer Bluffs Foundation Inc — $54,103 · Arts & CultureEMPORIA ARTS COUNCIL — $47,178 · Arts & CultureFLINT HILLS DISCOVERY CENTER FOUNDATION — $16,695 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $5,000 · Arts & CultureEMPORIA FRIENDS OF THE ZOO INC — $58,000 · AnimalsOlpe Community Improvement Inc — $50,000 · Recreation & SportsPLUMB PLACE INC DBA SOUTHWICK HOUSE — $50,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,728,080Philanthropy$396,000Human Services$218,866Arts & Culture$187,976Animals$58,000Recreation & Sports$50,000Housing & Shelter$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEmporia Community Foundation — $252,500 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetSymphony in the Flint Hills Inc — $225,000 over 5y, 5.7% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL EMPORIA AREA — $125,000 over 2y, 59% of budgetNLC YOUTH ASSOCIATION — $93,340 over 3y, 25% of budgetEMPORIA AREA CHAMBER FOUNDATION — $91,500 over 2y, 30% of budgetHETLINGER DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES I — $84,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetCAMP WOOD YMCA INC — $73,941 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetEMPORIA MAIN STREET INC — $72,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetDRINKWATER & SCHRIVER MILL INC — $65,000 over 2y, 88% of budgetEMPORIA FRIENDS OF THE ZOO INC — $58,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetThe Pioneer Bluffs Foundation Inc — $54,103 over 2y, 14% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE FLINT HILLS INC — $52,000 over 5y, 6.2% of budgetOlpe Community Improvement Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetEMPORIA AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE & VISITORS BUREAU — $50,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetEMPORIA ARTS COUNCIL — $47,178 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetEmporia Senior Center Inc — $31,585 over 1y, 12% of budgetVERDIGRIS VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetCOFFEY HEALTH FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetLYON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $21,255 over 1y, 10% of budgetCAMP ALEXANDER OF EMPORIA LYON COUNTY KANSAS INC — $20,445 over 1y, 12% of budgetRESOURCE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFLINT HILLS DISCOVERY CENTER FOUNDATION — $16,695 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetEAST CENTRAL KANSAS ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CORPORATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChase County Chamber of Commerce — $5,500 over 1y, 10% of budgetEMPORIA GRANADA THEATRE ALLIANCE IN — $5,304 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Emporia Community FoundationKS53.5× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Emporia Community Foundation · Ws & Ec Jones Testamentary Trust · E L and Z Irene Hopkins Private Foundation · Jane & Bernard Reeble Foundation · Emil Babinger Charitable Trust · Loretto a Langley Trust · Lewis Humphreys Charitable Trust · The Sunderland Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Turnbull Foundation Trust · United Way of the Flint Hills Inc · Kansas Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Agencies

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Trusler Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Trusler Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Trusler Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph