Skip to content
Longmont United Hospital at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Longmont United Hospital

We make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

$179k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$56k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$327kHuman Services$123kFood & Nutrition$96kEducation$60kRecreation & Sports$18kCommunity Improvement$14kHousing & Shelter$10kPhilanthropy$5k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $93,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $179,328 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $85,828 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $56k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$296M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RECOVERY CAFE$55,500
ST VRAIN VALLEY SCHOOLS$10,000
A WOMANS WORK LLC$10,000
COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE$10,000
LONGMONT MEALS ON WHEELS$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $88k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HOPE HOMELESS OUTREACH PROVIDING ENCOURAGEMENT: $10k → 12%HOPE: $10k → 12%HOMELESS OUTREACH PROVIDING ENCOURAGEMENT: $5k → 12%Via Mobility Services: $20k → 12%VIA MOBILITY SERVICES: $20k → 12%VIA MOBILITY SERVICES: $15k → 12%INTERCAMBIO DE COMUNIDADES: $8k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$454k · 8 repeat orgs$192k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$454k
$137k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+20%

Still filing today

100%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST VRAIN VALLEY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $65k · revenue +56%
  • VM
    Via Mobility Services
    3× · 2017–2019 · $55k · revenue +30%
  • AW
    A WOMAN'S WORK INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $53k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • SF
    SALUD FAMILY HEALTHgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $104k · revenue +46%
  • IO
    IMPACT ON EDUCATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $13k · revenue +43%
  • JP
    Justin Parker Neurological Institute
    one grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue -23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Meals On Wheels of Boulder Inc

The mission of meals on wheels is to provide nutritious meals to residents of the community who need and want their services, regardless of age or income.

Food & Nutrition
2
Longmont Area Chamber of Commerce

To promote business and industry in the longmont area.

—
3
Latino Community Foundation of Colorado Inc

The foundation is a state-based philanthropic foundation - led by latinos and for latinos. the foundation pursues civic, economic, and cultural opportunities that drive a more authentic narrative about latinos in the state and cement a…

Arts & Culture
4
The Longmont Community Foundation

Improving life in the st. vrain valley through philanthropy and charitable leadership

Philanthropy
5
Boulder Carshare

To provide and promote alternatives to individual car ownership, thereby reducing the environmental and social impacts associated with motor vehicle use.

Environment
6
Boulder Valley Women's Health Center Inc

Our mission is to provide high quality and equitable reproductive and sexual health services, abortion, and education to all people, regardless of any barriers to healthcare that they may face.

—
7
Healthier Colorado

Healthier colorado is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to raising the voices of coloradans in the public policy process to improve the health of our state's residents. we believe that every coloradan should have a fair…

Health
8
Boulder Bike Sharing

Promote health, quality of life and preservation of the environment in boulder, colorado by building and operating a comprehensive city-wide bike sharing

—
9
Colorado Chamber of Commerce Fka Co Assn of Commerce & Industry

The colorado chamber of commerce mission is to enhance the business climate of the state of colorado by promoting a positive legislative and regulatory environment and providing programs and services for its members, economic education,…

—
10
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
11
Colorado Food Cluster Inc

Provide opportunities for all to thrive by offering free food resources to communities.

Food & Nutrition
12
Elevations Credit Union

Together we create solutions for a better life.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation Boulder County; the most unlike its peers is Justin Parker Neurological Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LONGMONT UNITED HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $146,935 · OtherLONGMONT UNITED HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONST VRAIN VALLEY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $65,000 · OtherST VRAIN VALLEY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INCLONGMONT MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $46,475 · OtherLONGMONT MEALS ON WHEELS INCLONGMONT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP: $13,500 · OtherIMPACT ON EDUCATION INC: $12,500 · Other+1 more: $5,000 · OtherSALUD FAMILY HEALTH: $104,110 · HealthSALUD FAMILY HEALTHRECOVERY CAFE LONGMONT: $55,500 · HealthRECOVERY CAFE LONGMONTJustin Parker Neurological Institute: $7,500 · HealthVia Mobility Services: $55,000 · Human ServicesVia Mobility ServicesA WOMAN'S WORK INC: $52,500 · Human ServicesA WOMAN'S WORK INCHOMELESS OUTREACH PROVIDING ENCOURAGEMENT: $25,000 · Human ServicesHOMELESS OUTREACH PROVID…INTERCAMBIO DE COMUNIDADES: $7,500 · Human ServicesINTERCAMBIO DE COMUNIDAD…COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC: $50,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$289,410Health$167,110Human Services$140,000Food & Nutrition$50,000Philanthropy$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLONGMONT UNITED HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $146,935 over 4y, 9.9% of budgetSALUD FAMILY HEALTH: $104,110 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST VRAIN VALLEY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $65,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetVia Mobility Services: $55,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetA WOMAN'S WORK INC: $52,500 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLONGMONT MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $46,475 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetHOMELESS OUTREACH PROVIDING ENCOURAGEMENT: $25,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetLONGMONT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP: $13,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetIMPACT ON EDUCATION INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetJustin Parker Neurological Institute: $7,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetINTERCAMBIO DE COMUNIDADES: $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTHY LEARNING PATHS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives Founda…The Longmont Communit…Community Foundation …The Denver FoundationMile High United Way …Lynn & Helen N Clark …Rose Community Founda…The Colorado Health F…Ray Lanyon FundCatholic Health Initi…Daniels FundSilicon Valley Commun…
Colorado Gives FoundationCO24.5× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Longmont Community Foundation · Community Foundation Boulder County · The Denver Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Lynn & Helen N Clark Crt · Rose Community Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Ray Lanyon Fund · Catholic Health Initiatives Colorado · Daniels Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Longmont United Hospital funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Longmont United Hospital. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Longmont United Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home