· Public charity
Longmont United Hospital
We make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $93,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $179,328 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $85,828 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $56k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RECOVERY CAFE | $55,500 |
| ST VRAIN VALLEY SCHOOLS | $10,000 |
| A WOMANS WORK LLC | $10,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE | $10,000 |
| LONGMONT MEALS ON WHEELS | $8,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $88k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
ST VRAIN VALLEY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC7× · 2018–2025 · $65k · revenue +56%- VMVia Mobility Services3× · 2017–2019 · $55k · revenue +25%
- AWA WOMAN'S WORK INC6× · 2020–2025 · $53k · revenue +23%
Funded once
- SFSALUD FAMILY HEALTHgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $104k · revenue +46%
- IOIMPACT ON EDUCATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $13k · revenue +43%
- JPJustin Parker Neurological Instituteone grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue -23%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of meals on wheels is to provide nutritious meals to residents of the community who need and want their services, regardless of age or income.
To promote business and industry in the longmont area.
The foundation is a state-based philanthropic foundation - led by latinos and for latinos. the foundation pursues civic, economic, and cultural opportunities that drive a more authentic narrative about latinos in the state and cement a…
Improving life in the st. vrain valley through philanthropy and charitable leadership
To provide and promote alternatives to individual car ownership, thereby reducing the environmental and social impacts associated with motor vehicle use.
Our mission is to provide high quality and equitable reproductive and sexual health services, abortion, and education to all people, regardless of any barriers to healthcare that they may face.
Healthier colorado is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to raising the voices of coloradans in the public policy process to improve the health of our state's residents. we believe that every coloradan should have a fair…
Promote health, quality of life and preservation of the environment in boulder, colorado by building and operating a comprehensive city-wide bike sharing
The colorado chamber of commerce mission is to enhance the business climate of the state of colorado by promoting a positive legislative and regulatory environment and providing programs and services for its members, economic education,…
To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.
Provide opportunities for all to thrive by offering free food resources to communities.
Together we create solutions for a better life.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation Boulder County and the most unlike its peers is Justin Parker Neurological Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LONGMONT UNITED HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SALUD FAMILY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds ST VRAIN VALLEY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RECOVERY CAFE LONGMONT ↗
- Who funds Via Mobility Services ↗
- Who funds A WOMAN'S WORK INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC ↗
- Who funds LONGMONT MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds HOMELESS OUTREACH PROVIDING ENCOURAGEMENT ↗
- Who funds LONGMONT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds IMPACT ON EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds Justin Parker Neurological Institute ↗
- Who funds INTERCAMBIO DE COMUNIDADES ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY ↗
- Who funds HEALTHY LEARNING PATHS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Longmont Community Foundation · Community Foundation Boulder County · The Denver Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Lynn & Helen N Clark Crt · Rose Community Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Ray Lanyon Fund · Catholic Health Initiatives Colorado · Daniels Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Longmont United Hospital funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.