Skip to content

· Public charity

Long Island 2 Day Walk to Figh Breast Cancer Inc

Li2day was organized to raise awareness and funds for the breast cancer and other cancer research, to benefit cancer sufferers,

$229k
Granted FY2020
10
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$42k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Health$921kEducation$53kHuman Services$28kReligion$14kOther$0
02FY2020 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $178,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $228,860 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $50,360 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k4 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $160k
$18,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$8k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MANHASSET WOMANS$42,000
BABYLON BC C$31,000
GRANTS$29,400
NORTHSHORE NEIG$28,300
THOMAS SCULLY F$18,000
ADELPHI NYS BC$11,000
BRENTWOOD BAYSHO$8,000
CURE MOMMYS BC$5,600
STRENGTH FOR LIF$3,200
ISLIP BCC$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%MANHASSET WOMANS: $42k → 6%NORTHSHORE NEIG: $65k → 7%MANHASSET WOMANS: $28k → 6%NORTHSHORE NEIG: $64k → 7%MANHASSET WOMANS: $21k → 6%THOMAS SCULLY F: $46k → 7%MANHASSET WOMANS: $20k → 6%NORTHSHORE NEIG: $28k → 7%CURE MOMMYS BC: $18k → 6%N S NEIGHBORS: $27k → 7%ADELPHI NYS BC: $28k → 6%THOMAS SCULLY F: $18k → 7%CURE MOMMYS BC: $16k → 6%BRENTWOOD BAY: $18k → 7%ADELPHI NYS BC: $25k → 6%BRENTWOOD BAYSHO: $16k → 7%CURE MOMMYS BC: $13k → 6%BRENTWOOD BAYSHO: $12k → 7%ADELPHI NYS BC: $24k → 6%BRENTWOOD BAYSHO: $8k → 7%CURE MOMMYS BC: $6k → 6%WEST ISLIP BCC: $14k → 7%ADELPHI NYS BC: $11k → 6%ISLIP BCC: $18k → 7%SOUTH NASSAU CH: $17k → 6%ISLIP BCC: $17k → 7%SOUTH NASSAU CH: $17k → 6%ISLIP BCC: $13k → 7%SOUTH NASSAU CH: $11k → 6%ISLIP BCC: $2k → 7%BROOKHAVEN MEM H: $31k → 7%LONG ISLAND CH: $26k → 7%STRENGTH FOR LIF: $16k → 7%BABYLON BC COAL: $55k → 7%STRENGTH FOR LIF: $15k → 7%BABYLON BC C: $43k → 7%STRENGTH FOR LIF: $13k → 7%BABYLON BC C: $31k → 7%STRENGTH FOR LIF: $3k → 7%LUCIAS ANGELS: $43k → 7%LUCIAS ANGELS: $18k → 7%MAURER FOUNDATIO: $18k → 7%MAURER FOUNDATIO: $13k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 14 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2020, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
1

Total granted

$1.0M
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+5%

Still filing today

64%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
HealthEducationScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BB
    BABYLON BREAST CANCER COALITION INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $129k · revenue +2%
  • MW
    MANHASSET WOMEN'S COALITION AGAINST BREAST CANCER INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $111k · revenue +17%
  • AU
    ADELPHI UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $88k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • WI
    WEST ISLIP BREAST CANCER COALITION FOR LONG ISLAND INC
    one grant, 2018 · $14k · revenue +5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Breast Cancer Network of Western New Yorkinc

Our mission is to support the well being of all western new yorkers impacted by breast cancer.

Health
2
Breast Cancer Help Inc

Increasing research into the cause, treatment and cure of breast cancer; improving access for all women to high quality breast cancer screening, diagnosis and treatment; and encouraging other areas to conduct mapping and surveys to help…

—
3
Suffolk Breast Cancer Society Inc

Make awareness of Breast Cancer

—
4
Breast Cancer Resource Center

The mission of bcrc is to empower those affected by breast cancer with personalized support and compassion. bcrc is organized at the grass roots level by breast cancer survivors for the primary purpose of providing information and…

Health
5
We Fight Together Breast Cancer Community Inc

Breast cancer awareness

Health
6
New Hampshire Breast Cancer Coalition

The mission of the new hampshire breast cancer coalition is to advocate for and provide assistance to new hampshire residents with breast cancer

—
7
Brca Research and Cure Alliance
Health
8
SISTER2SISTER

Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death after lung cancer in women in the us overall, but its the leading cause of cancer death in black and hispanic women. geographical disparities in breast cancer incidence and…

Health
9
Inflammatory Breast Cancer International Consortium

To engage, educate and collaborate worldwide to bring about breakthroughs that will save lives from the toughest breast cancer: inflammatory breast cancer.

Health
10
The Breast Cancer Survivors Network

To provide assistance, education, positive support services before, during and after diagnosis, treatment and recovery of breast cancer.

Health
11
Lymph Rehab

Lymphatic rehab

Health
12
Breastcancerorg

Our mission is to help people make sense of the complex medical and personal information about breast health and breast cancer, so they can make the best decisions for their lives.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Islip Breast Cancer Coalition; the most unlike its peers is Adelphi University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTH SHORE NEIGHBORS HELPING HAND COALITION INC: $184,700 · OtherNORTH SHORE NEIGHBORS HELPING HAND COALITION INCTHOMAS SCULLY F: $63,500 · OtherTHOMAS SCULLY FLUCIAS ANGELS INC: $60,800 · OtherLUCIAS ANGELS INCLONG ISLAND COMMUNITY HOSPITAL AT NYU LANGONE HEALTH: $56,800 · OtherLONG ISLAND COMMUNITY HOSPITAL AT NYU LANGONE HEALTHBRENTWOOD BAY: $53,600 · OtherBRENTWOOD BAYCURE MOMMYS BREAST CANCER: $51,700 · OtherCURE MOMMYS BREAST CANCERGRANTS: $42,150 · OtherGRANTS+1 more: $14,100 · OtherMANHASSET WOMEN'S COALITION AGAINST BREAST CANCER INC: $111,200 · HealthMANHASSET WOMEN'S COALITI…STRENGTH FOR LIFE INC: $46,900 · HealthSTRENGTH FOR LIFE INCSouth Nassau Communities Hospital Inc: $45,400 · HealthSouth Nassau Communities …THE MAURER FOUNDATION FOR BREAST HEALTH EDUCATION INC: $30,700 · HealthTHE MAURER FOUNDATION FOR…BABYLON BREAST CANCER COALITION INC: $129,300 · EducationBABYLON BREAST CANCER C…ADELPHI UNIVERSITY: $87,950 · EducationADELPHI UNIVERSITYISLIP BREAST CANCER COALITION: $49,500 · Science & Tech
Other$527,350Health$234,200Education$217,250Science & Tech$49,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBABYLON BREAST CANCER COALITION INC: $129,300 over 3y, 18% of budgetMANHASSET WOMEN'S COALITION AGAINST BREAST CANCER INC: $111,200 over 4y, 15% of budgetADELPHI UNIVERSITY: $87,950 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLUCIAS ANGELS INC: $60,800 over 2y, 34% of budgetLONG ISLAND COMMUNITY HOSPITAL AT NYU LANGONE HEALTH: $56,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetISLIP BREAST CANCER COALITION: $49,500 over 4y, 30% of budgetSTRENGTH FOR LIFE INC: $46,900 over 4y, 12% of budgetSouth Nassau Communities Hospital Inc: $45,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MAURER FOUNDATION FOR BREAST HEALTH EDUCATION INC: $30,700 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetWEST ISLIP BREAST CANCER COALITION FOR LONG ISLAND INC: $14,100 over 1y, 12% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pink Aid IncCT24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pink Aid Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Long Island 2 Day Walk to Figh Breast Cancer Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Long Island 2 Day Walk to Figh Breast Cancer Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Long Island 2 Day Walk to Figh Breast Cancer Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Long Island 2 Day Walk to Figh Breast Cancer Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Long Island 2 Day Walk to Figh Breast Cancer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph