Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lochbaum Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$304k
Granted FY2024still arriving
39
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$130k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222024.

Youth Development$171kFood & Nutrition$145kHealth$89kPublic Safety & Disaster$60kArts & Culture$52kHuman Services$47kReligion$39kEducation$38kOther$0
02FY2024 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k33 grants · $89k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $130k
$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS GIRLS CLUBS OF THE COASTAL PLA$130,000
FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL EASTERN NC$30,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$20,000
BOUNTY SOUL$14,000
WHITE MEMORIAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$11,000
ALLIANCE MEDICAL MINISTRY$10,000
A PLACE AT THE TABLE$8,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$7,500
PUBLIC RADIO EAST$6,000
HEALING TRANSITIONS$6,000
STEP UP MINISTRY$5,000
CAROLINA COUNTRY CLUB FOUNDATION$5,000
PBS NORTH CAROLINA$5,000
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$5,000
INTERFAITH FOOD SHUTTLE$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 12% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MARTHA'S MISSION CUPBOARD: $2k → 12%MARTHA'S MISSION CUPBOARD: $2k → 12%MARTHA'S MISSION CUPBOARD: $1k → 12%INTERFAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $5k → 8%INTERFAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $4k → 8%INTERFAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $4k → 8%DIAPER TRAIN: $500 → 8%DIAPER TRAIN: $500 → 8%STEP UP MINISTRY: $5k → 8%STEP UP MINISTRY: $4k → 8%STEP UP MINISTRY: $4k → 8%YMCA OF THE TRIANGLE: $1k → 8%YMCA OF THE TRIANGLE: $1k → 8%YMCA OF THE TRIANGLE: $1k → 8%THE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT: $3k → 8%THE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT: $2k → 8%THE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$610k · 38 repeat orgs$84k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

38 repeat relationships — 37 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
18

Total granted

$610k
$83k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+5%

Still filing today

55%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthEducationFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE COASTAL PLAIN
    2× · 2023–2024 · $150k · revenue +28%
  • ALLIANCE MEDICAL MINISTRY INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $28k · revenue +17%
  • A PLACE AT THE TABLE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $24k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • WM
    WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY HOMER STRYKER MD SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +10%
  • FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +14%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTH CAROLINA
    one grant, 2022 · $17k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Research Triangle Regional Partnership

The research triangle regional partnership is an association of area economic development agencies dedicated to keeping the research triangle region economically strong by collectively marketing the region's competitive advantages and…

2
NourishNC Inc

NourishNC, Inc.'s goal is to provide healthy food to hungry children, empowering them to succeed in the classroom and in their community

Food & Nutrition
3
Raleigh County Community Action Association Inc

Raleigh county community action association, inc. empowers individuals and families to reach their highest levels of social and economical self-sufficiency, while identifying and eliminating causes of poverty. rccaa provides direct…

Human Services
4
Family Promise of Wake County Inc

Moving families at risk of or experiencing homelessness into sustainable, permanent housing in our community through a continuum of support services.

Housing & Shelter
5
Carolina Family Health Centers Inc

Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST

6
Carolina Community Care Inc

The mission of hospice & community care is to give hope, comfort, and compassion to those that need it most. hospice & community care is a nonprofit healthcare organization providing hospice and palliative care to residents of york,…

7
Carolina Meadows Foundation Inc

To solicit and receive gifts, grants, bequests and contributions for the support of carolina meadows, inc. in order to enhance or extend its mission, programs, services, and facilities.

Human Services
8
Hospice of Gaston County Inc

To provide compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.

9
Wake County Smart Start Inc

Wake county smart start invests in young children, their families, and a connected early childhood system that supports and prepares them for school and life ahead.

Education
10
Carolina Charter Academy

Operation of a public charter school.

Education
11
Coastal Carolinas Health Alliance

Facilitate networking among hospitals

Health
12
Nc Budget & Tax Center

As a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization, we work to document and analyze fiscal and economic conditions in partnership with community leaders and north carolinians with lived experience of poverty to advance systemic solutions through…

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598) and the most unlike its peers is Yates Mill Associates Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyMilitary & Veteran Support …Professional Trade Associat…Healthcare Advocacy and Sup…Independent K-12 SchoolsPerforming Arts Organizatio…Family Support & Housing Se…Affordable Housing Developm…University Support Foundati…Food Security & Crisis Assi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%3%<5yr18%3%5–10yr20%17%10–20yr13%24%20–35yr10%24%35–55yr10%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%3%<5yr18%0%5–10yr20%16%10–20yr13%18%20–35yr10%13%35–55yr10%51%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/31
the rest of the field
17%
2,700/16,267

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
19/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE COASTAL PLAIN — $150,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE COASTAL PLAINAMERICAN RED CROSS — $60,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL EASTERN NC — $55,000 · OtherFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL EASTERN NCWHITE MEMORIAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $39,000 · OtherWHITE MEMORIAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHTHE SALVATION ARMY — $22,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL — $19,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTH CAROLINA — $17,000 · Other+30 more — $94,100 · Other+30 moreA PLACE AT THE TABLE — $24,000 · Food & NutritionA PLACE AT…Bounty & Soul — $23,000 · Food & NutritionBounty & S…FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC — $20,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK …ALLIANCE MEDICAL MINISTRY INC — $28,000 · HealthHEALING TRANSITIONS INC — $16,000 · HealthTHE NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 · HealthWESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY HOMER STRYKER MD SCHOOL OF MEDICINE — $25,000 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · EducationRALEIGH CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL INC — $6,000 · EducationINTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE — $13,000 · Human ServicesSTEPUP MINISTRY — $13,000 · Human ServicesTHE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT — $5,500 · Human ServicesMartha Mission Cupboard Inc — $5,000 · Human ServicesThe Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598) — $3,000 · Human Services+2 more — $1,500 · Human ServicesAPPALACHIA SERVICE PROJECT INC — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterCASA — $6,000 · Housing & ShelterCAROLINA COUNTRY CLUB FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$456,600Food & Nutrition$67,000Health$51,500Education$51,000Human Services$41,000Housing & Shelter$16,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE COASTAL PLAIN — $150,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetALLIANCE MEDICAL MINISTRY INC — $28,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetWESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY HOMER STRYKER MD SCHOOL OF MEDICINE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA PLACE AT THE TABLE — $24,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetBounty & Soul — $23,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHEALING TRANSITIONS INC — $16,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetINTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE — $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPUP MINISTRY — $13,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAPPALACHIA SERVICE PROJECT INC — $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAROLINA COUNTRY CLUB FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetDOROTHEA DIX PARK CONSERVANCY — $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRALEIGH CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL INC — $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCASA — $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT — $5,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMartha Mission Cupboard Inc — $5,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetHOSPICE OF WAKE COUNTY INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598) — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYates Mill Associates Inc — $2,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetPIEDMONT COUNCIL OF TRADITIONAL MUSIC INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA ARTS IN ACTION INC — $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIAPER TRAIN — $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRALEIGH LITTLE THEATRE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSeasons Village Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE COASTAL PLAIN
  • Who funds ALLIANCE MEDICAL MINISTRY INC
  • Who funds WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY HOMER STRYKER MD SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
  • Who funds A PLACE AT THE TABLE
  • Who funds Bounty & Soul
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds HEALING TRANSITIONS INC
  • Who funds INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE
  • Who funds STEPUP MINISTRY
  • Who funds APPALACHIA SERVICE PROJECT INC
  • Who funds CAROLINA COUNTRY CLUB FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds DOROTHEA DIX PARK CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds RALEIGH CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds CASA
  • Who funds THE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT
  • Who funds THE NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Martha Mission Cupboard Inc
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF WAKE COUNTY INC
  • Who funds The Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598)
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Yates Mill Associates Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

A E Finley Foundation IncNC32.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: A E Finley Foundation Inc · North Carolina Community Foundation · Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Bell Koonce Burnette Foundation · Bell Cook Family Foundation · Ella Ann L and Frank B Holding Foundatio · John William Pope Foundation · Bell Schaefer Family Foundation · W Trent Ragland Jr Foundation · Chaucer Charitable Foundation · C Hamilton Sloan Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lochbaum Family Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph