Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lmcl Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$542k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$3.6MArts & Culture$2.0MReligion$524kRecreation & Sports$386kHuman Services$185kHealth$100kYouth Development$20k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $47
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $31k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $621k
  • $250k+2 grants · $958k
$153,783
Median grant
3
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEGACY HERITAGE TEACHER LEADER FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM$542,181
LEGACY HERITAGE PROGRAMMING V LLC$415,614
CAMP RAMAH IN NEW ENGLAND INC$186,250
LEGACY HERITAGE TEACHER INSTITUTE FOR THE ARTS$155,555
LEGACY HERITAGE TEACHER MAKER INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM$153,783
RAJE-USA INC$75,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LIVNOT ULEHIBANOT$50,000
LEGACY HERITAGE TEACHERS INSTITUTE$31,491
LEGACY HERITAGE INVESTORS I LLC$47
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HARRY & ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $10k → 17%RAJE-USA INC: $75k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CA
CO
NC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.0M · 7 repeat orgs$848k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
19

Total granted

$6.0M
$537k

Still filing today

0%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $311k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsHuman ServicesHealthEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LH
    LEGACY HERITAGE PROGRAMMING V LLC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.0M
  • LH
    LEGACY HERITAGE TEACHER LEADER FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM
    4× · 2021–2024 · $1.8M
  • LH
    LEGACY HERITAGE TEACHER MAKER INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM
    4× · 2021–2024 · $866k

Funded once

  • IH
    ISRAEL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +4%
  • CM
    CAMP MOSHAVA OF WILD ROSE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +12%
  • CC
    COMMUNITY CENTERS OF CHICAGO
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Camp Ramah in Northern California

Camp ramah in northern california engages the members of our camp community in joyful, transformative experiences that serve as a model for lifelong jewish learning and practice, commitment to klal yisrael (israel and the jewish…

Recreation & Sports
2
Gan Israel Chabad Inc

Operation of summer day camp and overnight camp which combines activities with a Torah education

Recreation & Sports
3
Jewish Reconstructionist Camping Corporation

Incredibly diverse and welcoming communities where we encourage children to discover what being jewish means to themno matter who they are or where they come from.

Recreation & Sports
4
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
—
5
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
6
Hadar Hatorah Rabbinical College and Subsidary Machon Chana

Religious education

Education
7
Camp Morasha Inc

Camp Morasha integrates the best in informal and formal education in all of its programming and activities through a transformative and fun, co-ed, summer experience for Jewish youth. The camp inspires and develops the minds, bodies,…

Religion
8
Camp Chaverim Inc Dba Reyus

The corporation operates a summer sleep away camp providing campers the opportunity to interact with values of judaism in daily life. the corporation converted from for-profit status to nonprofit status to better carry out charitable and…

Recreation & Sports
9
Camp Degel Hatorah Inc

Provides a summer program for jewish boys of high school age. the mission is to continue the camper's religious studies in a relaxed setting while providing recreational opportunities.

Religion
10
Bronfman Youth Fellowships to Israel in Inc
Youth Development
11
Camp Hadar Inc

Provide all campers of all faiths with a fun, safe and rewarding camping experience in a jewish cultural environment with emphasis placed on personal growth, friendship, and fun.

Recreation & Sports
12
Camp Young Judaea Midwest Inc

Camp young judaea midwest, inspires jewish children of diverse backgrounds to thrive in a joyful, tight-knit community that is passionate about israel and judaism.

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Camp Ramah in New England Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Friends of Livnot ULehibanot. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LEGACY HERITAGE PROGRAMMING V LLC: $2,011,144 · OtherLEGACY HERITAGE PROGRAMMING V LLCLEGACY HERITAGE TEACHER LEADER FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM: $1,840,483 · OtherLEGACY HERITAGE TEACHER LEADER FELLOWSHIP PROGRAMLEGACY HERITAGE TEACHER MAKER INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM: $865,905 · OtherLEGACY HERITAGE TEACHER MAKER INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMLEGACY HERITAGE INSTITUTE FOR THE ARTS PROGRAM: $557,934 · OtherLEGACY HERITAGE INSTITUTE FOR THE ARTS PROGRAMLEGACY HERITAGE TEACHERS INSTITUTE: $376,835 · OtherLEGACY HERITAGE TEACHERS INSTITUTELEGACY HERITAGE TEACHER INSTITUTE FOR THE ARTS: $360,574 · OtherLEGACY HERITAGE TEACHER INSTITUTE FOR THE ARTS+13 more: $237,642 · OtherCAMP RAMAH IN NEW ENGLAND INC: $186,250 · Recreation & SportsCAMP MOSHAVA OF WILD ROSE INC: $100,000 · Recreation & SportsBEBER CAMP PROPERTY INC: $60,100 · Recreation & Sports+2 more: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsISRAEL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · HealthRAJE-USA INC: $75,000 · Human ServicesTHE HARRY AND ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MILWAUKEE: $10,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Friends of Livnot ULehibanot: $50,000 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · Education
Other$6,250,517Recreation & Sports$366,350Health$100,000Human Services$85,000International$50,000Education$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAMP RAMAH IN NEW ENGLAND INC: $186,250 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetISRAEL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCAMP MOSHAVA OF WILD ROSE INC: $100,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetRAJE-USA INC: $75,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetBEBER CAMP PROPERTY INC: $60,100 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAmerican Friends of Livnot ULehibanot: $50,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetJEP CONGREGATION OF LONG ISLAND: $23,050 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE HARRY AND ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MILWAUKEE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN THE POCONOS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRAMAH IN THE ROCKIES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAMP RAMAH IN NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP MOSHAVA OF WILD ROSE INC ↗
  • Who funds RAJE-USA INC ↗
  • Who funds BEBER CAMP PROPERTY INC ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Livnot ULehibanot ↗
  • Who funds JEP CONGREGATION OF LONG ISLAND ↗
  • Who funds THE HARRY AND ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MILWAUKEE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP RAMAH IN THE POCONOS ↗
  • Who funds RAMAH IN THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for Jewish Camp IncNY22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for Jewish Camp Inc · The Harold Grinspoon Foundation · Hlmh Inc · Ahba Inc · Clrc Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Oclo Inc · Ylry Inc · Gbrg Inc · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lmcl Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lmcl Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lmcl Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Lmcl Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lmcl’s filings →

    More from the funding graph