· Private foundation
Lmcl Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $47
- $10k–50k1 grant · $31k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $621k
- $250k+2 grants · $958k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LEGACY HERITAGE TEACHER LEADER FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM | $542,181 |
| LEGACY HERITAGE PROGRAMMING V LLC | $415,614 |
| CAMP RAMAH IN NEW ENGLAND INC | $186,250 |
| LEGACY HERITAGE TEACHER INSTITUTE FOR THE ARTS | $155,555 |
| LEGACY HERITAGE TEACHER MAKER INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM | $153,783 |
| RAJE-USA INC | $75,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LIVNOT ULEHIBANOT | $50,000 |
| LEGACY HERITAGE TEACHERS INSTITUTE | $31,491 |
| LEGACY HERITAGE INVESTORS I LLC | $47 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $311k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LHLEGACY HERITAGE PROGRAMMING V LLC5× · 2020–2024 · $2.0M
- LHLEGACY HERITAGE TEACHER LEADER FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM4× · 2021–2024 · $1.8M
- LHLEGACY HERITAGE TEACHER MAKER INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM4× · 2021–2024 · $866k
Funded once
- IHISRAEL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +4%
- CMCAMP MOSHAVA OF WILD ROSE INCone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +12%
- CCCOMMUNITY CENTERS OF CHICAGOone grant, 2023 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Camp ramah in northern california engages the members of our camp community in joyful, transformative experiences that serve as a model for lifelong jewish learning and practice, commitment to klal yisrael (israel and the jewish…
Operation of summer day camp and overnight camp which combines activities with a Torah education
Incredibly diverse and welcoming communities where we encourage children to discover what being jewish means to themno matter who they are or where they come from.
To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…
Religious education
Camp Morasha integrates the best in informal and formal education in all of its programming and activities through a transformative and fun, co-ed, summer experience for Jewish youth. The camp inspires and develops the minds, bodies,…
The corporation operates a summer sleep away camp providing campers the opportunity to interact with values of judaism in daily life. the corporation converted from for-profit status to nonprofit status to better carry out charitable and…
Provides a summer program for jewish boys of high school age. the mission is to continue the camper's religious studies in a relaxed setting while providing recreational opportunities.
Provide all campers of all faiths with a fun, safe and rewarding camping experience in a jewish cultural environment with emphasis placed on personal growth, friendship, and fun.
Camp young judaea midwest, inspires jewish children of diverse backgrounds to thrive in a joyful, tight-knit community that is passionate about israel and judaism.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Camp Ramah in New England Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Friends of Livnot ULehibanot. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CAMP RAMAH IN NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP MOSHAVA OF WILD ROSE INC ↗
- Who funds RAJE-USA INC ↗
- Who funds BEBER CAMP PROPERTY INC ↗
- Who funds American Friends of Livnot ULehibanot ↗
- Who funds JEP CONGREGATION OF LONG ISLAND ↗
- Who funds THE HARRY AND ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MILWAUKEE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP RAMAH IN THE POCONOS ↗
- Who funds RAMAH IN THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Foundation for Jewish Camp Inc · The Harold Grinspoon Foundation · Hlmh Inc · Ahba Inc · Clrc Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Oclo Inc · Ylry Inc · Gbrg Inc · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Lmcl Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Lmcl Inc?
Find your warmest path to Lmcl Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.