Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lmac Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$46k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Environment$38kEducation$25kPublic Benefit$23kYouth Development$16kCivil Rights$16kFood & Nutrition$12kPhilanthropy$11kArts & Culture$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$719k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL$8,000
POTOMAC CONSERVANCY$6,000
BRENNAN CENTER$6,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$3,500
DC SCORES$3,500
CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER$3,000
VERIFIED VOTING FOUNDATION$2,550
LWVED$1,500
FAUQUIER FOOD BANK$1,000
PIEDMONT JOURNALISM FOUNDATION$1,000
CAFB$1,000
WAMU 885$1,000
US HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM$1,000
VIRGINIA OUTDOORS FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 49% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%HARVARD LAW SCHOOL: $5k → 8%STARKEY HEARING FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%VERIFIED VOTING FOUNDATION: $3k → 22%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $4k → 17%US HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM: $1k → 14%APPALACHIAN TRAIL CONSERV: $5k → 9%PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $8k → 6%OAR: $1k → 7%POTOMAC CONSERVANCY: $6k → 8%HARVARD LAW SCHOOL: $5k → 8%STARKEY HEARING FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%VERIFIED VOTING FOUNDATION: $2k → 22%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $1k → 17%US HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM: $1k → 14%APPALACHIAN TRAIL CONSERV: $5k → 9%PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $3k → 6%OAR: $1k → 7%POTOMAC CONSERVANCY: $3k → 8%HARVARD LAW SCHOOL: $5k → 8%VERIFIED VOTING FOUNDATION: $2k → 22%APPALACHIAN TRAIL CONSERV: $4k → 9%PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $3k → 6%POTOMAC CONSERVANCY: $3k → 8%HARVARD LAW SCHOOL: $5k → 8%VERIFIED VOTING FOUNDATION: $2k → 22%APPALACHIAN TRAIL CONSERV: $2k → 9%PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $3k → 6%POTOMAC CONSERVANCY: $3k → 8%VERIFIED VOTING FOUNDATION: $2k → 22%APPALACHIAN TRAIL CONSERV: $2k → 9%PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $3k → 6%CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER: $3k → 14%CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER: $3k → 14%CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER: $2k → 14%CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER: $2k → 14%CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER: $2k → 14%BRENNAN CENTER: $6k → 14%DC SCORES: $4k → 14%DC SCORES: $4k → 14%BRENNAN CENTER: $3k → 14%DC SCORES: $3k → 14%DC SCORES: $3k → 14%DC SCORES: $3k → 14%BRENNAN CENTER: $3k → 14%BRENNAN CENTER: $3k → 14%BRENNAN CENTER: $2k → 14%LWVEF: $2k → 14%LWVED: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
PA
WV
VA
MD
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$175k · 25 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
6

Total granted

$175k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+20%

Still filing today

52%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionEnvironmentEducationCrime & LegalArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    THE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL
    5× · 2020–2024 · $20k · revenue +108%
  • DS
    DC SCORES
    5× · 2020–2024 · $16k · revenue +94%
  • TP
    THE POTOMAC CONSERVANCY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $15k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • AF
    Arlington Food Assistance Center
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +19%
  • MT
    MARTHA'S TABLE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +8%
  • DB
    DC BAR PRO BONO CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $500 · revenue +31%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Council for Court Excellence

Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.

—
2
Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments

Create a more accessible, sustainable, prosperous and livable national capital region by being a discussion forum, expert resource, issue advocate, and catalyst for action.

Public Benefit
3
Dc Policy Center

The mission of the d.c. policy center is to arm decision makers with fact-based, unbiased, and reliable research and analyses to help create a vibrant local economy that can maximize opportunities for residents, workers, and businesses in…

Public Benefit
4
Federal City Council

The mission of the federal city council is to focus the creativity, talent and resources of washington dc's business and civic leaders on washington, dc's biggest challenges and opportunities.

—
5
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
6
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
7
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
8
Dc Affordable Law Firm

DC Affordable Law Firm delivers accessible justice to modest-income DC residents who do not qualify for traditional sources of free civil legal services and cannot afford standard representation. Our innovative programming expands access…

Human Services
9
Montgomery County Food Council Inc

Mcfc builds an equitable, resilient and sustainable local food system through collaboration, transformation, and cultivation.mcfc envisions a vibrant and equitable food system that is healthy for our community, economy, and environment.

Food & Nutrition
10
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
11
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
12
American Civil Liberties Union of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through advocacy and lobbying.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Potomac Conservancy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Starkey Hearing Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HARVARD LAW SCHOOL: $20,000 · OtherHARVARD LAW SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $17,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDC SCORES: $16,000 · OtherDC SCORESBRENNAN CENTER: $16,000 · OtherBRENNAN CENTERVerified Voting Foundation: $8,550 · OtherVerified Voting FoundationPPFA: $5,500 · OtherFAUQUIER FOOD BANK: $4,500 · OtherLWV-VA ED FUND: $4,000 · Other+17 more: $27,850 · Other+17 moreTHE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $20,000 · EnvironmentTHE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMEN…THE POTOMAC CONSERVANCY INC: $15,000 · EnvironmentTHE POTOMAC CONSERVANCY…GOOSE CREEK ASSOCIATION: $2,750 · EnvironmentGOOSE CREEK ASSOCIATIONTHE CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER INC: $11,500 · Crime & LegalCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $3,000 · Food & NutritionBREAD FOR THE CITY INC: $2,000 · Food & NutritionArlington Food Assistance Center: $1,000 · Food & NutritionMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $1,000 · Food & NutritionThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $3,500 · Arts & CulturePIEDMONT JOURNALISM FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Community ImprovementMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,000 · International
Other$119,900Environment$37,750Crime & Legal$11,500Food & Nutrition$7,000Arts & Culture$3,500Community Improvement$3,000International$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $20,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDC SCORES: $16,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE POTOMAC CONSERVANCY INC: $15,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER INC: $11,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVerified Voting Foundation: $8,550 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $3,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPIEDMONT JOURNALISM FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGOOSE CREEK ASSOCIATION: $2,750 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetStarkey Hearing Foundation: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSOME INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBREAD FOR THE CITY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetArlington Food Assistance Center: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSE OF RUTH: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEWS LITERACY PROJECT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds DC SCORES ↗
  • Who funds THE POTOMAC CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Verified Voting Foundation ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds PIEDMONT JOURNALISM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds GOOSE CREEK ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Starkey Hearing Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SOME INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAD FOR THE CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Arlington Food Assistance Center ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA'S TABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds DC BAR PRO BONO CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF RUTH ↗
  • Who funds THE NEWS LITERACY PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN9.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lmac Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lmac Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lmac Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Lmac Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lmac’s filings →

    More from the funding graph