· Private foundation
LLB Corporation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $53k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| Food Bank of the Rockies | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation | $7,500 |
| Colorado Uplift | $7,500 |
| Cooperative Care Center | $7,500 |
| Catholic Charities of Sothern Colorado | $5,000 |
| A Precious Child | $5,000 |
| Urban Promise Nashville | $5,000 |
| University of Colorado Foundation | $5,000 |
| Energy Outreach Colorado | $3,500 |
| Comback Yoga | $2,000 |
| Weld Food Bank | $2,000 |
| Prodigy Coffehouse | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation6× · 2020–2025 · $37k · revenue +26%
- CUCOLORADO UPLIFT INC6× · 2020–2025 · $33k · revenue +41%
- EOENERGY OUTREACH COLORADO6× · 2020–2025 · $13k · revenue +186%
Funded once
- GCGRALAND COUNTRY DAY SCHOOLgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $16k · revenue +26%
- PCPUEBLO CO-OP CAREone grant, 2020 · $5k
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN COLORADOone grant, 2024 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.
To deliver meaningful news, music, and cultural experiences to everyone in colorado using the power of the human voice in all its forms
Colorado nonprofit association strengthens colorado's nonprofits through education, connection and advocacy.
Together we create solutions for a better life.
Provide opportunities for all to thrive by offering free food resources to communities.
Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.
To develop leaders that will become a strong, unified voice for agricultural issues.
The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…
See schedule o colorado state university foundation assists in the promotion, development, and enhancement of facilities and educational programs and enhancements of faculty, students, and alumni of colorado state university (csu). this is…
Empower colorado education leaders through advocacy, professional learning and networking to deliver on the promise of public education
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Uplift Inc and the most unlike its peers is Urban Promise Nashville. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation ↗
- Who funds COLORADO UPLIFT INC ↗
- Who funds GRALAND COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds ENERGY OUTREACH COLORADO ↗
- Who funds COMEBACK YOGA ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds A PRECIOUS CHILD INC ↗
- Who funds WELD FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds COLORADO OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Denver Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization LLB Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to LLB Corporation?
Find your warmest path to LLB Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.