· Private foundation
Lizzie J Cheney Charitable Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GRANITE HEARTH | $2,900 |
| WAYPOINT | $1,750 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UTUPREACH THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC5× · 2017–2024 · $7k · revenue +36%
- WWAYPOINT3× · 2021–2025 · $5k · revenue +24%
- MRMount Royal Academy Inc3× · 2017–2019 · $3k · revenue +41%
Funded once
- NHNew Hampshire Catholic Charitiesone grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +6%
- CACHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF COOS COUNTYgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +69%
- WHWEBSTER HOUSEgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +68%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Transitional and permanent supportive housing - provides shelter in the greater Manchester NH area. Services include housing, counseling (including substance abuse counseling), job search assistance, etc.
CityHope walks with individuals and families, empowering and equipping them with the necessary resources and skills needed to thrive in their communities. By providing support services to those experiencing financial hardships and housing…
Harbor Care's mission is to provide vital services, including housing and healthcare to all in our communities needing assistance. Our vision is one where everyone gets to live safe, stable, and healthy lives, filled with purpose, respect…
The mission of our place is to provide residential options, services and support designed to meet the needs of adults with developmental disabilities. we are dedicated to fostering growth and independence through vocational, social, and…
To promote responsible and sustainable home ownership opportunities for low and moderate income earners by producing comprehensive training and counseling, as well as promoting the use of special mortgage products and down payment…
To enrich the quality of life of all people on Mount Desert Island through recreational, educational and social programs.
to provide homeless families in Belknap county with a safe shelter and to empower families to become self sufficient and independent providing and making available education and resources.
Daycare services
Headrest, Inc. is a nonprofit corporation that provides information and referral, crisis intervention and other related services through the uses of a telephone hotline and office visitations. Headrest also provides counseling and…
We exist to share the hope of the Gospel of Jesus Christ as well as provide shelter, food, and clothing to the poor and needy in obedience to Him.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Keene Housing Kids Collaborative and the most unlike its peers is Stepping Stones. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UPREACH THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WAYPOINT ↗
- Who funds RISE AGAIN OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds Mount Royal Academy Inc ↗
- Who funds GRANITE HEARTH ↗
- Who funds New Hampshire Catholic Charities ↗
- Who funds STEPPING STONES ↗
- Who funds CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF COOS COUNTY ↗
- Who funds WEBSTER HOUSE ↗
- Who funds KEENE HOUSING KIDS COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds LAKES REGION HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds New Generation Inc ↗
- Who funds Sunset Hill Educational Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds Friends of The Music Hall ↗
- Who funds RISE FOR BABY AND FAMILY ↗
- Who funds MAPS COUNSELING SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Liberty House Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Trust Uw Oleonda Jameson · James F Kelly and Fernande Kelly Charitable · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · Marion C Cohen Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Monadnock United Way Inc · The McIninch Foundation · The Penates Foundation · Samuel P Hunt Foundation · Arthur Jr Dobles & Olive G Dobles Crut · Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-Trustees
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Lizzie J Cheney Charitable Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.