· Private foundation
Marion C Cohen Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NH MUSCULOSKELETAL INSTITUTE | $2,150 |
| THE GREATER WAKEFIELD RESOURCE CENTER | $2,150 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES NEW HAMPSHIRE | $1,350 |
| HARBOR HOMES INC | $1,350 |
| CHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND NH | $1,350 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 7% of Marion C Cohen Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in NH; read by stated purpose it is 94% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against -11% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NHNew Hampshire Catholic Charities6× · 2017–2025 · $12k · revenue +25%
- JHJOHN HAY ESTATE AT THE FELLS5× · 2017–2023 · $8k · revenue +42%
- NENew England College3× · 2017–2020 · $6k · revenue +46%
Funded once
- HNHUNDRED NIGHTS INCone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -59%
- HAHealthy at Home Incone grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -45%
- MCMERRIMACK CONCERT ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue -11%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The holding company for 615 Amherst St, Harbor Care's licensed residential treatment center for individuals and families living with substance use disorder.
Northern New Hampshire Healthcare Collaborative, Inc. will ensure access to quality care within the communities in which our patients live, provide local and high quality care with positive outcomes to our patients in Coos County while…
Transitional and permanent supportive housing - provides shelter in the greater Manchester NH area. Services include housing, counseling (including substance abuse counseling), job search assistance, etc.
We are dedicated to advancing care at home through personal empowerment, compassion, and exceptional service.
We are dedicated to delivering outstanding home health and hospice services that enrich the lives of the people we serve.
Helping individuals and families find their way to a life free of the effects of alcohol and other drugs through comprehensive treatment and recovery services open to all.
Home Health Care
Retirement Home - Operation of church sponsored retirement home with 13 rooms and care for up to 15 residents
Empowering people to lead full and satisfying lives through effective treatment and support.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hundred Nights Inc and the most unlike its peers is Merrimack Concert Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds New Hampshire Catholic Charities ↗
- Who funds JOHN HAY ESTATE AT THE FELLS ↗
- Who funds RISE AGAIN OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds New England College ↗
- Who funds HUNDRED NIGHTS INC ↗
- Who funds Harbor Homes Inc ↗
- Who funds Healthy at Home Inc ↗
- Who funds MERRIMACK CONCERT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds New Hampshire Furniture Masters Association ↗
- Who funds FLEUR DE LIS CAMP INC ↗
- Who funds D ACRES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER WAKEFIELD RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds PEMI YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MAPS COUNSELING SERVICES ↗
- Who funds KEENE HOUSING KIDS COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds NASHUA ADULT LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Liberty House Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Trust Uw Oleonda Jameson · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · James F Kelly and Fernande Kelly Charitable · Arthur Jr Dobles & Olive G Dobles Crut · Lizzie J Cheney Charitable Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · The McIninch Foundation · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Marion C Cohen Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.