Skip to content

· Private foundation

Live Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$67k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$143kHealth$128kEducation$100kHuman Services$40kReligion$32kCommunity Improvement$12kYouth Development$6kInternational$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $39k
$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$612k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NW ALLIANCE FOR BLIND ATHLETES$15,000
IDAHO STATE UNIV FOUNDATION$14,000
ADAPTIVE CYCLING OF SOUTHERN IDAHO$10,000
NEW DAY$7,000
HODIA IDAHO DIABETES YOUTH PROGRAM$6,000
FAMILY SERVICE ALLIANCE$5,000
LIVING INDEPENDENCE NETWORK CORP$5,000
TOYS FOR TOTS$3,000
ENVISION SIGHT$1,328
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%RISING STAR THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC: $8k → 11%FAMILY SERVICES ALLIANCE: $14k → 14%NORTHWEST ASSOCIATION FOR BLIND ATHLETES: $10k → 9%NORTHWEST ASSOCIATION FOR BLIND ATHLETES: $10k → 9%RISING STAR THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC: $5k → 11%NORTHWEST ASSOCIATION FOR BLIND ATHLETES: $10k → 9%RISING STAR THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC: $3k → 11%NORTHWEST ASSOCIATION FOR BLIND ATHLETES: $5k → 9%FAMILY SERVICE ALLIANCE: $5k → 14%NORTHWEST ASSOCIATION FOR BLIND ATHLETES: $5k → 9%LIVING INDEPENDENCE NETWORK CORP: $5k → 8%LIVING INDEPENDENCE NETWORK: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 46% of Live Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 90% of the giving stays in ID; by stated purpose, 46%.

Live Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$344k · 16 repeat orgs$130k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
21

Total granted

$344k
$115k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
0%

Still filing today

44%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IS
    Idaho State University Foundation Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +129%
  • ES
    ENVISION SIGHT INC
    4× · 2017–2024 · $49k · revenue +62%
  • NA
    NORTHWEST ASSOCIATION FOR BLIND ATHLETES
    5× · 2017–2021 · $40k · revenue +332%

Funded once

  • NA
    NORTHWEST ASSOC FOR BLIND ATHLETES
    one grant, 2022 · $16k
  • NA
    NW ASSOC FOR BLIND ATHLETES
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • E
    ENVISION
    one grant, 2021 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Disability Rights Idaho Inc

The organization protects, promotes and advances the legal and human rights of individuals with disabilities, through quality legal, individual, and system advocacy.

—
2
Idaho Educational Services for the Deaf and the Blind Foundation Inc

To promote, ensure & maintain excellent & comprehensive educational opportunities for the children and youth served by Idaho Educational Services for the Deaf and Blind from birth to 26 years of age across the state of Idaho.

Unclassified
3
Indigenous Idaho Alliance Inc
Civil Rights
4
Idaho Elks Rehab Hospital Inc
Health
5
Idaho Forest Restoration Partnership
Environment
6
Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care
Health
7
Larche Spokane

To make known the gifts of people with development disabilities, revealed through mutually transforming relationships, to foster an environment in community that responds to the changing needs of members while being faithful to the core…

Human Services
8
Idaho Legal Aid Services Inc Idaho Legal Aid Services Inc

Idaho legal aid services inc is a statewide nonprofit law firm dedicated to providing equal access for low-income people through quality advocacy and education

Crime & Legal
9
Achieve Tahoe

To provide affordable inclusive physical and recreational activities that build health and confidence.

Unclassified
10
Nami Idaho

Nami idaho works to improve the quality of life for all those affected by mental illness through support, education, advocacy and research.

Human Services
11
Eastern Montana Industries

Assist individuals with disabilities

—
12
Treasure Valley Transit Inc

Provide Transportation Services

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Special Olympics Idaho Inc; the most unlike its peers is Midway Elementary School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ENVISION SIGHT INC: $49,359 · OtherENVISION SIGHT INCADAPTIVE CYCLING OF SOUTHERN IDAHO: $36,514 · OtherADAPTIVE CYCLING OF SOUTHERN IDAHONEW DAY: $32,000 · OtherNEW DAYFAMILY SERVICES ALLIANCE OF SE IDAHO: $20,000 · OtherFAMILY SERVICES ALLIANCE OF SE IDAHONORTHWEST ASSOC FOR BLIND ATHLETES: $15,820 · OtherNORTHWEST ASSOC FOR BLIND ATHLETESNW ALLIANCE FOR BLIND ATHLETES: $15,000 · OtherNW ALLIANCE FOR BLIND ATHLETESNW ASSOC FOR BLIND ATHLETES: $15,000 · OtherNW ASSOC FOR BLIND ATHLETESENVISION: $11,500 · OtherADAPTIVE CYCLING OF IDAHO: $10,000 · Other+19 more: $61,945 · Other+19 moreIdaho State University Foundation Inc: $79,840 · EducationIdaho State Universi…MIDWAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $6,650 · EducationMIDWAY ELEMENTARY SC…NORTHWEST ASSOCIATION FOR BLIND ATHLETES: $40,000 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST ASSOCIATIO…FAMILY SERVICES ALLIANCE: $19,200 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICES ALLI…RISING STARS THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC: $15,900 · Human ServicesRISING STARS THERAPE…LIVING INDEPENDENCE NETWORK COPORATION: $9,736 · Human ServicesLIVING INDEPENDENCE …Idaho Diabetes Youth Program: $20,985 · Youth DevelopmentSPECIAL OLYMPICS IDAHO INC: $7,500 · Recreation & SportsSPECIALIZED NEEDS RECREATION INC: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsWELLNESS TREE COMMUNITY CLINIC: $6,000 · Health
Other$267,138Education$86,490Human Services$84,836Youth Development$20,985Recreation & Sports$8,500Health$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIdaho State University Foundation Inc: $79,840 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetENVISION SIGHT INC: $49,359 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetNORTHWEST ASSOCIATION FOR BLIND ATHLETES: $40,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetIdaho Diabetes Youth Program: $20,985 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES ALLIANCE: $19,200 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetRISING STARS THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC: $15,900 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetLIVING INDEPENDENCE NETWORK COPORATION: $9,736 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS IDAHO INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMIDWAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $6,650 over 1y, 11% of budgetAquability Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetWELLNESS TREE COMMUNITY CLINIC: $6,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetLIONS INTERNATIONAL BOISE BENCH: $2,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetIDAHO FALLS RESCUE MISSION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSPECIALIZED NEEDS RECREATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Idaho State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ENVISION SIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST ASSOCIATION FOR BLIND ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds Idaho Diabetes Youth Program ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICES ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds RISING STARS THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVING INDEPENDENCE NETWORK COPORATION ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS IDAHO INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDWAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Aquability Inc ↗
  • Who funds WELLNESS TREE COMMUNITY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds LIONS INTERNATIONAL BOISE BENCH ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO FALLS RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIALIZED NEEDS RECREATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Idaho Community Foundation IncID17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · St Luke's Health System Ltd · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Live Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Live Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Live Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Live Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Live’s filings →

    More from the funding graph