Skip to content

· Private foundation

Little Stream Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$167k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$34k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

International$119kEducation$95kYouth Development$54kHealth$25kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kEmployment$3k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $164k
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$6.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIFTING HANDS INTERNATIONAL$33,926
URBAN PROMISE MINISTRIES$24,000
Individual grant recipient$24,000
ALLIANCE FOR HAITI'S CHILDREN$23,000
RISING STAR OUTREACH$20,000
SANTA MONICA FIRE DEPT RELIEF FUND$15,000
Individual grant recipient$14,000
SUCCESS IN EDUCATION UTAH$10,000
BRIDGE TO ENTER ADVANCED MATHEMATIC$1,500
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%RISING STAR OUTREACH: $20k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$212k · 4 repeat orgs$99k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
5

Total granted

$212k
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-17%
0%

Still filing today

75%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $62k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
EducationInternationalHealthEmploymentPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LH
    Lifting Hands International
    2× · 2024–2025 · $66k · revenue 0%
  • UM
    URBANPROMISE MINISTRIES
    3× · 2023–2025 · $54k · revenue -17%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2024–2025 · $53k

Funded once

  • CR
    CRISTO REY
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • TF
    THE FRIENDSHIP BENCH INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • GH
    GENERATION HOPEgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue ×12
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope Ignites

Hope Ignites nurtures and guides motivated young people in need to become well-educated, career-ready men and women for others.

Human Services
2
Yours Humanly

Yours Humanly (YH) transforms the lives of children in need around the world by providing access to quality education and equitable resources. Through its two flagship initiatives, Coloring Futures and Bridging Gaps, YH has completed 34…

Education
3
Generations Humanitarian

Generations Humanitarian is committed to transforming street children toward an abundance of health, hope and loving homes thereby breaking the cycle of scarcity for generations to come.

International
4
Journeys of Hope
Education
5
Asian Hope Inc

By altering the future of vulnerable children in cambodia through life changing programs of christian education and community development, asian hope is creating a generation of compassionate, equipped, christian leaders.

Philanthropy
6
Educating Kids in Ghana

Educating kids in ghana

Education
7
Charm School International

Life skills course, on-on-one mentoring, equipped high school stuents

—
8
Learnserve International

LearnServe international equips high school students from diverse backgrounds with the entrepreneurial vision, tenacity, confidence and leadership skills needed to tackle social challenges at home and abroad.

Education
9
Pratham International Inc

Pratham international was established to support learning innovations for children and youth in contexts across the globe. the organization facilitates the adaptation and dissemination of proven, scalable solutions, such as the…

International
10
Building Schools in Africa
Education
11
Heights and Minds Foundation

Heights and Minds thrives to give children the best start in life by preventing malnutrition and promotiong child development. We work through establishing MindUps in low income countries.

Human Services
12
Hope for Children Promise for Haiti

Provide life skills and need

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Donorschooseorg; the most unlike its peers is Generation Hope. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
1/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

URBANPROMISE MINISTRIES: $54,127 · OtherURBANPROMISE MINISTRIESIndividual grant recipient: $52,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCRISTO REY: $25,000 · OtherCRISTO REYSANTA MONICA FIRE DEPT RELIEF FUND: $15,000 · OtherSANTA MONICA FIRE DEPT RELIEF FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $14,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSUCCESS IN EDUCATION UTAH: $10,000 · OtherSUCCESS IN EDUCATION UTAH+2 more: $3,000 · OtherLifting Hands International: $66,426 · InternationalLifting Hands Internatio…Alliance for Haitis Children: $39,000 · PhilanthropyAlliance for H…Rising Star Outreach Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE FRIENDSHIP BENCH INC: $5,000 · HealthGENERATION HOPE: $2,500 · EducationDONORSCHOOSEORG: $1,826 · EducationPER SCHOLAS INC: $2,500 · Employment
Other$173,627International$66,426Philanthropy$39,000Human Services$20,000Health$5,000Education$4,326Employment$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLifting Hands International: $66,426 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetURBANPROMISE MINISTRIES: $54,127 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAlliance for Haitis Children: $39,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetRising Star Outreach Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE FRIENDSHIP BENCH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPER SCHOLAS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $1,826 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Lifting Hands International ↗
  • Who funds URBANPROMISE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Alliance for Haitis Children ↗
  • Who funds Rising Star Outreach Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDSHIP BENCH INC ↗
  • Who funds GENERATION HOPE ↗
  • Who funds PER SCHOLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA10.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Little Stream Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Little Stream Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Urbanpromise Ministries: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Little Stream’s filings →

More from the funding graph