Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lisa Mitchell Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Health$30kHuman Services$9kEducation$9kReligion$8kArts & Culture$8kPhilanthropy$5kYouth Development$4kFood & Nutrition$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$300
Median grant
5
States reached
$399k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$6,900
USA MITCHELL CANCER INSTITUTE$6,900
MOBILE AREA JEWISH FEDERATION$1,100
UMS WRIGHT SCHOOL$1,000
UNITED WAY SO WEST$1,000
USA HEALTH$1,000
JEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$600
OUR SISTERS' CLOSET$300
MOBILE MUSEUM OF ART$250
CONG AHAVAS CHESED$200
AMERICA HEART ASSOC$200
ST JUDE$100
RONALD MCDONALD$100
EXPLOREUM$100
VIA$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 99% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%READING IS FUDAMENTAL: $650 → 14%MITCHELL'S PLACE: $1k → 16%DISTINGUSHED YOUNG WOMEN: $1k → 19%RAMAH DAROM: $1k → 8%MITCHELL'S PLACE: $650 → 16%DISTINGUSHED YOUNG WOMEN: $1k → 19%DISTINGUSHED YOUNG WOMEN: $650 → 19%FEEDING THE GULF SOUTH: $1k → 19%ANIMAL RESCUE: $650 → 19%FEEDING THE GULF SOUTH: $650 → 19%UMS WRIGHT SCHOOL: $2k → 19%UMS WRIGHT SCHOOL: $1k → 19%UMS WRIGHT SCHOOL: $1k → 19%UMS WRIGHT SCHOOL: $1k → 19%VIA-SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER: $1k → 19%CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $1k → 19%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $1k → 19%SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES: $1k → 19%MOBILE HISTORIC PRESERVATION SOCIETY: $650 → 19%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $650 → 19%CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $650 → 19%VIA-SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER: $650 → 19%MOBILE AREA JEWISH FEDERATION: $1k → 19%MOBILE AREA JEWISH FEDERATION: $1k → 19%MOBILE AREA JEWISH FEDERATION: $1k → 19%SISTERHOOD OF AHAVAS CHESED: $1k → 19%MOBILE AREA JEWISH FEDERAL: $1k → 19%MOBILE BALLET: $1k → 19%MOBILE AREA JEWISH FEDERAL: $1k → 19%MOBILE BALLET: $800 → 19%SISTERHOOD OF AHAVAS CHESED: $750 → 19%USA MITCHELL CANCER INSTITUTE: $8k → 19%USA MITCHELL CANCER INSTITUTE: $7k → 19%USA CHILD & WOMEN: $8k → 19%USA MITCHELL CANCER INSTITUTE: $6k → 19%USA CHILD & WOMEN: $7k → 19%USA MITCHELL CANCER INSTITUTE: $2k → 19%USA CHILD & WOMEN: $6k → 19%MOBILE ART MUSEUM: $1k → 19%USA CHILD & WOMEN: $2k → 19%USA MITCHELL CANCER INSTITUTE: $1k → 19%USA CHILD & WOMEN: $1k → 19%USA HEALTH: $1k → 19%USA HOSPITALITY PROGRAM: $650 → 19%UNITED WAY WOMENS INITIATIVE: $650 → 19%USA CHILD & WOMEN: $650 → 19%MOBILE ART MUSEUM: $650 → 19%USA MITCHELL CANCER INSTITUTE: $650 → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$97k · 27 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
13

Total granted

$97k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+88%

Still filing today

26%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    Our Sisters Closet Inc
    5× · 2020–2025 · $3k · revenue +99%
  • PH
    PENELOPE HOUSE INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $2k · revenue +3%
  • TC
    THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $2k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • RD
    RAMAH DAROM INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • SC
    Senior Citizens Services Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +72%
  • MA
    Mobile Arts Council Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $650 · revenue +88%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Metropolitan Arts Center

To cultivate the arts in Jefferson County and the State of Alabama.

Arts & Culture
2
Magic City Acceptance Academy Charter Sc

The Magic City Acceptance Academy (MCAA) facilitates a community in which all learners are empowered to embrace education, achieve individual success, and take ownership of their future in a positive learning environment.

Education
3
Cultural Arts Center Inc

To coordinate and to encourage cultural endeavors and to promote knowledge and appreciation of the arts and humanities in southeast alabama.

Arts & Culture
4
Mobile Symphony Inc

The purpose of the organization is to make lives better through music by producing and promoting symphonic music and delivering music education programs throughout Alabama and the Gulf Coast region.

Arts & Culture
5
Michigan Ballet Academy

To deliver the highest quality training in an atmosphere of creativity, challenge, encouragement, and integrity.

Arts & Culture
6
Musical Theater Center

The musical theater center's mission is to share the joy of children's theater with many diverse audiences. it strives to be a positive force in the community by providing exceptional musical theater stage productions made up entirely of…

Arts & Culture
7
Family Counseling Center of Mobile Inc

The Center operates in Southwest Alabama providing counseling and guidance to individuals, families, and groups experiencing problems related to stress, family discord, parenting, phobias, aging, rape, and financial difficulties.

Human Services
8
Birmingham Bloomfield Art Ctr Inc

The Birmingham Bloomfield Art Center connects people of all ages and abilities with visual arts education, exhibitions, and other creative experiences.

Arts & Culture
9
Metro Theater Company

Inspired by the intelligence and emotional wisdom of young people, we create professional theater, foster inclusive community, and nurture meaningful learning through the arts.

Arts & Culture
10
Mobile United Inc

To present a forum for business and citizens where an exchange of ideas can occur that will make Mobile a better place to live, work and do business.

Community Improvement
11
The Arc of Tuscaloosa

The mission of the Arc of Tuscaloosa County is to provide activities to persons residing in Tuscaloosa County who have developmental or intellectual disabilities, which enable the individual to maintain previously acquired skills/behaviors…

Human Services
12
Centre for the Living Arts

The mission of alabama contemporary is to support cultural production, provide space for courageous conversations that shape identity, and seed growth in the greater creative economy. we support living artists, and through our educational,…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mobile Arts Council Inc and the most unlike its peers is Reading Is Fundamental Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA — $24,085 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMAIndividual grant recipient — $23,635 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUMS WRIGHT SCHOOL — $5,000 · Other+35 more — $44,288 · Other+35 moreOur Sisters Closet Inc — $2,985 · Human ServicesPENELOPE HOUSE INC — $2,385 · Human ServicesMOBILE AREA JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $3,300 · PhilanthropyMITCHELL'S PLACE INC — $2,185 · HealthREADING IS FUNDAMENTAL INC — $650 · EducationBARTON ACADEMY FOUNDATION — $650 · EducationGIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA — $1,100 · Youth DevelopmentMobile Arts Council Inc — $650 · Arts & CultureMOBILE MUSEUM OF ART INC — $250 · Arts & Culture
Other$97,008Human Services$5,370Philanthropy$3,300Health$2,185Education$1,300Youth Development$1,100Arts & Culture$900

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMOBILE AREA JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $3,300 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetOur Sisters Closet Inc — $2,985 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetPENELOPE HOUSE INC — $2,385 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $2,185 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMITCHELL'S PLACE INC — $2,185 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LEARNING TREE INC — $2,085 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOBILE BALLET INC — $1,900 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA — $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSenior Citizens Services Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMobile Arts Council Inc — $650 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetREADING IS FUNDAMENTAL INC — $650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBARTON ACADEMY FOUNDATION — $650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOBILE MUSEUM OF ART INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MOBILE AREA JEWISH FEDERATION INC
  • Who funds Our Sisters Closet Inc
  • Who funds PENELOPE HOUSE INC
  • Who funds THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC
  • Who funds MITCHELL'S PLACE INC
  • Who funds THE LEARNING TREE INC
  • Who funds MOBILE BALLET INC
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
  • Who funds Senior Citizens Services Inc
  • Who funds Mobile Arts Council Inc
  • Who funds READING IS FUNDAMENTAL INC
  • Who funds BARTON ACADEMY FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mayer & Arlene Mitchell Charitable FoundationAL24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mayer & Arlene Mitchell Charitable Foundation · The Ben May Charitable Trust Hancock Whitney Bank Successor Trustee · Crampton Trust #1255000731 Regions Bank Trustee · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Joy M & James Grodnick Charitable Founda Tion · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Herbert a Meisler Charitable Foundation · The Miller Charitable Foundation Inc · Cd Helen and Jeff Glaze Foundation · Dog Hill Foundation · Mary J Larkins Charitable Foundation · Skyros Benevolent Society

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lisa Mitchell Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lisa Mitchell Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Lisa Mitchell Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph