Skip to content

· Public charity

Lions Club of Clearwater

Promote the community through city improvement projects, supporting youth activities, and by aiding needy individuals and families.

$320k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$148kPublic Benefit$130kAnimals$79kHealth$47kHuman Services$47kArts & Culture$45kRecreation & Sports$44kPublic Safety & Disaster$27kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $144,628, the rows itemized in this filing. The $320,335 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $175,707 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $116k
$11,800
Median grant
1
States reached
$114k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLEARWATER FOOD SHELF$38,450
CITY OF CLEARWATER$25,800
CLEARWATER HERITAGE FESTIVAL$15,000
ANGEL REINS STABLE$13,000
THREE OF A KIND$11,800
CLEAR LAKE BASEBALL$11,578
CLEARWATER RIVER CATS$8,400
ST CLOUD AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT$7,800
BECKER SCHOOL DISTRICT$7,000
BECKER YOUTH SPORTS ASSOCIATION$5,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%THREE OF A KIND: $12k → 11%THREE OF A KIND: $12k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Lions Club of Clearwater’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in MN; by stated purpose, 91%.

Lions Club of Clearwaterlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$492k · 9 repeat orgs$104k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +110% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
6

Total granted

$492k
$71k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+110%
0%

Still filing today

44%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CLEARWATER CLEAR LAKE FOOD SHELF
    9× · 2017–2025 · $148k · revenue +110%
  • SB
    SILVER BULLET SADDLE CLUB
    5× · 2017–2022 · $54k · revenue +125%
  • TF
    TRUE FRIENDS
    4× · 2021–2024 · $48k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • CF
    CLEARWATER FIRE DEPT RELIEF ASSOC
    one grant, 2022 · $27k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • CD
    CAN DO CANINES
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Legion Post 104 Nelson

To serve litchfield, the surrounding community, and the usa. to promote the principles and policies set forth by the national and department constitutions of the american legion.

—
2
Minnesota American Legion Auxiliary and the Sons of the American
—
3
American Legion

The American Legion was chartered and incorporated by Congress in 1919 as a patriotic veterans organization devoted to mutual helpfulness. It is the nation's largest wartime veterans service organization, committed to mentoring youth and…

—
4
American Legion Kerner-Slusser Post 0063

To operate a non-profit club for members. all of whom are veterans. 215 served.

—
5
American Legion Post 112

To provide social activities and other aid to veterans

—
6
Pets for Vets Minneapolis-St Paul

To help heal the emotional wounds of military veterans by using the power of the human-animal bond to provide a second chance for shelter animals by rescuing, training and pairing them with america's servicemen and women who could benefit…

Animals
7
American Legion

Promote Americanism, Law & Order, Comradeship

Public Benefit
8
American Legion Post 93

To provide financial assistance and to provide a place for all veterans, soldiers and their families to gather and meet.(see schedule o)

—
9
American Legion Post 30

The American Legion is a nonpartisan, not-for-profit organization with great political influence perpetuated by its grass-roots involvement in the legislation process from local districts to Capitol Hill. Legionnaires' sense of obligation…

—
10
American Legion Post 428 Silver Star

The American Legion's Mission is "For God and Country". To uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States of America; to maintain law and order; to foster and perpetuate a 100% Americanism; to preserve the memories and incidents…

—
11
American Legion Department of Michigan

To uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States of America.

—
12
American Legion Post 397 Fiebirch

The organization provides services and benefits to united states veterans

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is True Friends; the most unlike its peers is Can Do Canines. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF CLEARWATER: $130,450 · OtherCITY OF CLEARWATERSILVER BULLET SADDLE CLUB: $54,022 · OtherSILVER BULLET SADDLE CLUBCLEARWATER HERITAGE FESTIVAL: $45,000 · OtherCLEARWATER HERITAGE FESTIVALCLEARWATER FIRE DEPT RELIEF ASSOC: $26,600 · OtherCLEARWATER FIRE DEPT RELIEF ASSOCCLEAR LAKE AREA YOUTH BASEBALL: $17,578 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherCLEARWATER RIVER CATS: $14,400 · Other+6 more: $48,000 · Other+6 moreCLEARWATER CLEAR LAKE FOOD SHELF: $148,100 · PhilanthropyCLEARWATER CLEAR LAKE FOOD S…TRUE FRIENDS: $48,400 · Recreation & SportsTRUE FRIEN…Becker Youth Association: $5,800 · Recreation & SportsBecker You…3 OF A KIND: $23,600 · Human ServicesANGEL REINS STABLE: $13,000 · HealthPOWER TO SAVE A LIFE INC ADVOCATES FOR HEALTH: $6,495 · Health
Other$351,050Philanthropy$148,100Recreation & Sports$54,200Human Services$23,600Health$19,495

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCLEARWATER CLEAR LAKE FOOD SHELF: $148,100 over 9y, 18% of budgetSILVER BULLET SADDLE CLUB: $54,022 over 5y, 8.7% of budgetTRUE FRIENDS: $48,400 over 4y, 0.3% of budget3 OF A KIND: $23,600 over 2y, 32% of budgetANGEL REINS STABLE: $13,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetCAN DO CANINES: $10,100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe American Legion: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOWER TO SAVE A LIFE INC ADVOCATES FOR HEALTH: $6,495 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetBecker Youth Association: $5,800 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN LEGION POST 323: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CLEARWATER CLEAR LAKE FOOD SHELF ↗
  • Who funds SILVER BULLET SADDLE CLUB ↗
  • Who funds TRUE FRIENDS ↗
  • Who funds 3 OF A KIND ↗
  • Who funds ANGEL REINS STABLE ↗
  • Who funds CAN DO CANINES ↗
  • Who funds The American Legion ↗
  • Who funds POWER TO SAVE A LIFE INC ADVOCATES FOR HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds Becker Youth Association ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LEGION POST 323 ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Xcel Energy FoundationMN12.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Xcel Energy Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lions Club of Clearwater funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lions Club of Clearwater. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lions Club of Clearwater?

    Find your warmest path to Lions Club of Clearwater through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lions Club of Clearwater’s filings →

    More from the funding graph