Skip to content

· Private foundation

Linlundh Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$898k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$18MEducation$5.4MHealth$728kInternational$166kHuman Services$108kPublic Safety & Disaster$87kFood & Nutrition$75kPublic Benefit$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $65k
  • $250k+3 grants · $2.0M
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ACADEMY OF THE NEW CHURCH & SCHOOL$897,600
BRYN ATHYN CHURCH$572,500
GENERAL CHURCH OF THE NEW JERUSALEM$570,000
NEW CHRISTIAN BIBLE STUDY CO$65,000
NDSC$30,000
SHORE MEMORIAL HEALTH FOUNDATION$20,000
JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL$5,000
SWEDENBORG SOCIETY$1,000
SWEDENBORG SCIENTIFIC ASSOCIATION$1,000
THETA ALPHA INTERNATIONAL$1,000
SWEDENBORG FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 4% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS: $25k → 11%PA WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $25k → 11%AMERICARES: $45k → 9%NATIONAL DOWN SYNDROME CONGRESS: $98k → 14%NDSC: $30k → 16%SHORE MEMORIAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $45k → 11%NEW CHRISTIAN BIBLE STUDY CO: $65k → 11%PHILADELPHIA KOREAN CHURCH: $40k → 22%AMERICARES: $40k → 9%NATIONAL DOWN SYNDROME CONGRESS: $97k → 14%SHORE MEMORIAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $35k → 11%NEW CHRISTIAN BIBLE STUDY CORP: $40k → 11%PHILABUNDANCE: $75k → 22%AMERICARES: $40k → 9%NATIONAL DOWN SYNDROME CONGRESS: $60k → 14%NEW CHRISTIAN BIBLE STUDY CO: $40k → 11%AMERICARES: $40k → 9%NATIONAL DOWN SYNDROME CONGRESS: $57k → 14%NEW CHRISTIAN BIBLE STUDY CO: $40k → 11%BRYN ATHYN CHURCH: $8.4M → 7%BRYN ATHYN CHURCH: $983k → 7%BRYN ATHYN CHURCH: $924k → 7%ACADEMY OF THE NEW CHURCH & SCHOOL: $898k → 7%BRYN ATHYN CHURCH: $883k → 7%ACADEMY OF THE NEW CHURCH & SCHOOL: $849k → 7%ACADEMY OF THE NEW CHURCH & SCHOOL: $786k → 7%ACADEMY OF THE NEW CHURCH & SCHOOL: $763k → 7%BRYN ATHYN CHURCH: $728k → 7%BRYN ATHYN CHURCH: $710k → 7%ACADEMY OF THE NEW CHURCH & SCHOOL: $701k → 7%ACADEMY OF THE NEW CHURCH & SCHOOL: $617k → 7%BRYN ATHYN CHURCH: $573k → 7%GENERAL CHURCH OF THE NEW JERUSALEM: $570k → 7%GENERAL CHURCH OF THE NEW JERUSALEM: $569k → 7%GENERAL CHURCH OF THE NEW JERUSALEM: $563k → 7%GENERAL CHURCH OF THE NEW JERUSALEM: $527k → 7%BRYN ATHYN CHURCH: $478k → 7%ACADEMY OF THE NEW CHURCH & SCHOOL: $476k → 7%GENERAL CHURCH OF THE NEW JERUSALEM: $455k → 7%GENERAL CHURCH OF THE NEW JERUSALEM: $336k → 7%GENERAL CHURCH OF THE NEW JERUSALEM: $314k → 7%ACADEMY OF THE NEW CHURCH & SCHOOL: $273k → 7%GENERAL CHURCH OF THE NEW JERUSALEM: $133k → 7%NEW CHURCH ASSISTANCE MISSION: $70k → 7%NEW CHURCH ASSISTANCE MISSION: $65k → 7%HOLY REDEEMER HEALTHCARE: $56k → 7%HOLY REDEEMER HEALTHCARE: $55k → 7%PHILADELPHIA KOREAN CHURCH: $40k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MD
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$24M · 23 repeat orgs$204k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
9

Total granted

$24M
$169k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+69%

Still filing today

48%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthReligionInternationalPublic Safety & DisasterPublic BenefitAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ND
    NATIONAL DOWN SYNDROME CONGRESS
    4× · 2017–2020 · $312k · revenue +84%
  • NC
    NEW CHRISTIAN BIBLE STUDY CORP
    4× · 2020–2024 · $185k · revenue +14%
  • BA
    Bryn Athyn Fire Company
    4× · 2017–2020 · $87k · revenue +119%

Funded once

  • Philabundancegraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue +41%
  • PW
    PA WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +89%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
4
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
5
Seton Health Foundation Inc

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. founded in community-based legacies of compassionate healing, we…

—
6
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
7
Good Samaritan Foundation

Partnering for healing and a healthy future through philanthropy.

—
8
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Emerson Health System Inc

Emerson health systems is the parent organization of four subsidiaries - emerson hospital, emerson occupational health services, emerson property development and emerson health care foundation. emerson health systems provides its…

Health
10
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Health and Environmental Sciences Institute

The health and environmental sciences institute (hesi) is a nonprofit institution whose mission is to engage scientists from academia, government, industry, nonprofit, and other research institutions to identify and resolve global health…

Science & Tech
12
Air & Space Forces Association

The air & space forces association (afa) is a nonprofit, independent, professional military, and aerospace education association. the association's mission is to promote dominant u.s. air and space forces as the foundation of a strong…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
15/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRYN ATHYN CHURCH: $13,642,300 · OtherBRYN ATHYN CHURCHACADEMY OF THE NEW CHURCH & SCHOOL: $5,362,200 · OtherACADEMY OF THE NEW CHURCH & SCHOOLGENERAL CHURCH OF THE NEW JERUSALEM: $3,466,600 · OtherGENERAL CHURCH OF THE NEW JERUSALEM+22 more: $668,000 · OtherNATIONAL DOWN SYNDROME CONGRESS: $312,000 · HealthABINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION: $75,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $35,000 · HealthSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $25,000 · HealthNEW CHRISTIAN BIBLE STUDY CORP: $185,000 · Religion+1 more: $2,000 · ReligionAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $165,000 · InternationalSHORE MEMORIAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $140,000 · PhilanthropyBryn Athyn Fire Company: $87,000 · Public Safety & DisasterPhilabundance: $75,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$23,139,100Health$447,000Religion$187,000International$165,000Philanthropy$140,000Public Safety & Disaster$87,000Food & Nutrition$75,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL DOWN SYNDROME CONGRESS: $312,000 over 4y, 6.9% of budgetNEW CHRISTIAN BIBLE STUDY CORP: $185,000 over 4y, 18% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $165,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBryn Athyn Fire Company: $87,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetABINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPhilabundance: $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $55,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $43,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAbington Art Center: $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSWEDENBORG FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPENNYPACK ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION TRUST: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL DOWN SYNDROME CONGRESS ↗
  • Who funds NEW CHRISTIAN BIBLE STUDY CORP ↗
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Bryn Athyn Fire Company ↗
  • Who funds ABINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Philabundance ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
  • Who funds SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SWEDENBORG SCIENTIFIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Abington Art Center ↗
  • Who funds SWEDENBORG FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PENNYPACK ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION TRUST ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Asplundh FoundationPA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Asplundh Foundation · Theodore Brickman Ud 122794 Brickman Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Linlundh Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Linlundh Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Linlundh Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Linlundh Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Linlundh’s filings →

More from the funding graph