Skip to content

· Private foundation

Linden Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$79kHousing & Shelter$64kHuman Services$59kInternational$47kReligion$35kFood & Nutrition$11kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kCommunity Improvement$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$681k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$2,500
COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE OF THE LV$2,500
CURE INTERNATIONAL$2,500
LEHIGH COUNTY CONFERENCES OF CHURCHES$2,500
THE LYNFIELD COMMUNITY CENTER$2,500
FAMILY PROMISE OF LEHIGH VALLEY$2,500
QUAKERTOWN COMMUNITY CENTER$2,500
CHILDREN'S HOME OF EASTON$1,500
BUCKS COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$1,500
ALS ASSOCIATION$1,500
BETTY LOU'S PANTRY$1,500
KEYSTONE OPPORTUNITY CENTER$1,500
ALLENTOWN RESCUE MISSION$1,500
TURNING POINT OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY$1,000
UPPER BUCKS LIONS KIDNEY FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%BETWEEN FRIENDS OUTREACH: $500 → 6%FAMILY PROMISE OF LEHIGH VALLEY: $5k → 11%FAMILY PROMISE OF LEHIGH VALLEY: $4k → 11%FAMILY PROMISE OF LEHIGH VALLEY: $4k → 11%FAMILY PROMISE OF LEHIGH VALLEY: $3k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON: $1k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON: $500 → 11%FAMILY PROMISE OF LEHIGH VALLEY: $3k → 11%FAMILY PROMISE OF LEHIGH VALLEY: $2k → 11%FAMILY PROMISE OF LEHIGH VALLEY: $1k → 11%TURNING POINT OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $1k → 11%TURNING POINT OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $1k → 11%TURNING POINT OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $1k → 11%TURNING POINT OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
PA
CA
VA
MD
DE
NC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Linden Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Linden Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 11% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$244k · 28 repeat orgs$68k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +75% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
18

Total granted

$244k
$64k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
+20%

Still filing today

50%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LR
    LOVE RAN RED FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $25k · revenue +36%
  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE LEHIGH VALLEY
    7× · 2018–2025 · $20k · revenue +360%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOME OF EASTON INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $13k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • DIRECT RELIEF
    one grant, 2022 · $34k · revenue +8%
  • GS
    GLOBAL SERVICES MISSION
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • CG
    CASA GUADALUPE CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +62%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lenape Valley Foundation

The mission of lenape valley foundation is to partner with members of our community encountering mental health, substance use, intellectual or developmental challenges as they pursue their personal aspirations and an enhanced quality of…

Health
2
Allegheny Lutheran Social Ministries Inc

To serve people through a ministry of love, compassion, and mercy in the name of our lord, jesus christ.

Human Services
3
Summit Legal Aid

Civil justice for those in need, their homes secured, families protected, and finances fortified.

Crime & Legal
4
Victory House of Lehigh Valley

Victory house of lehigh valley is committed to addressing the challenges faced by men and veterans in their transition from homelessness. they are provided shelter services and supportive resources to move toward independence in the…

—
5
Life'swork of Western Pennsylvania

We partner with people with disabilities, people with other barriers, young adults, children, and families to pursue their hopes and dreams through strengthening workplace abilities, building life skills, and developing meaningful…

—
6
Lutheran Social Services of Central Ohio Delaware Housing Inc

See schedule oto create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home…

—
7
Jewish Family Service of the Lehigh Valley

Jewish family service of the lehigh valley, guided by jewish values, helps individuals and families to live healthier, more stable lives by providing social services, professional counseling, education, and community programs. our vision…

Human Services
8
Center for Community Resources Inc

To coordinate services among private and government agencies for specialized populations to ensure service continuity, reduce duplication, and assist individuals and families in accessing appropriate mental health, intellectual…

Health
9
Liberty Resources Inc

Lri is a consumer-driven organization that advocates and promotes independent living for persons with disabilities. lri is the center for independent living (cil) in the philadelphia area which advocates for and works with persons with…

—
10
Lifewell

Lifewell aims to provide hope and recovery through our person-centered residential, outpatient, housing and community living programs. we provide integrated healthcare services to low-income adults with behavioral and physical illness and…

—
11
Pocono Health System

We heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value supported by education and clinical research.

—
12
Habitat for Humanity of the Lehigh Valley

Habitat for humanity of the lehigh valley, inc. engages in the construction, rehabilitation, critical home repair, and the sale of housing to economically disadvantaged people on a nonprofit basis in the lehigh valley area of pennsylvania.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Home of Easton Inc; the most unlike its peers is Living the Dream Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/24
Grantees still filing
18/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $28,000 · OtherMAKE A WISH FOUNDATIONCURE: $15,000 · OtherCURETHE CHILDREN'S HOME OF EASTON INC: $13,000 · OtherTHE CHILDREN'S HOME OF EASTON INCDAILY HOPE MINISTRIES: $12,000 · OtherDAILY HOPE MINISTRIESST JOHN'S UCC COOPERSBURG: $12,000 · OtherST JOHN'S UCC COOPERSBURGCOMMUNITY ACTION COMMITEE OF THE LV: $10,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTION COMMITEE OF THE LVQUAKERTOWN COMMUNITY CENTER: $10,000 · OtherQUAKERTOWN COMMUNITY CENTERSIXTH STREET SHELTER: $9,000 · OtherNEW BETHANY INC: $8,500 · OtherLEHIGH COUNTY CONFERENCES OF CHURCHES: $8,000 · Other+21 more: $48,050 · Other+21 moreDIRECT RELIEF: $34,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEFCURE INTERNATIONAL INC: $8,000 · InternationalCURE INTERNATIO…LOVE RAN RED FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · HealthLOVE RAN RED…CASA GUADALUPE CENTER: $5,000 · HealthCASA GUADALU…Living the Dream Foundation: $2,500 · HealthLiving the D…AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $1,555 · HealthAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $1,500 · HealthFAMILY PROMISE LEHIGH VALLEY: $20,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PR…TURNING POINT OF LEHIGH VALLEY INC: $3,500 · Human ServicesTURNING P…PROJECT OF EASTON INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesPROJECT O…+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesALLENTOWN RESCUE MISSION INC: $14,000 · Housing & ShelterKEYSTONE OPPORTUNITY CENTER INC: $4,500 · Housing & ShelterBETTY LOUS PANTRY INC: $8,500 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY SERVICES FOR CHILDREN INC: $4,500 · EducationCOMMUNITY BIKE WORKS: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentCAMELOT FOR CHILDREN: $500 · Youth Development
Other$174,050International$42,000Health$35,555Human Services$25,500Housing & Shelter$18,500Food & Nutrition$8,500Education$4,500Youth Development$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $34,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOVE RAN RED FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE LEHIGH VALLEY: $20,000 over 7y, 3.2% of budgetALLENTOWN RESCUE MISSION INC: $14,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME OF EASTON INC: $13,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNEW BETHANY INC: $8,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBETTY LOUS PANTRY INC: $8,500 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetCURE INTERNATIONAL INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCASA GUADALUPE CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICES FOR CHILDREN INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKEYSTONE OPPORTUNITY CENTER INC: $4,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTURNING POINT OF LEHIGH VALLEY INC: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUPPER BUCKS LIONS KIDNEY FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 6y, 6.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY BIKE WORKS: $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $1,555 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT OF EASTON INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN CONGREGATIONAL SERVICES INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY INC: $550 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE AGAINST HEROIN: $550 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBETWEEN FRIENDS OUTREACH INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCAMELOT FOR CHILDREN: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds LOVE RAN RED FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE LEHIGH VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds ALLENTOWN RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME OF EASTON INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW BETHANY INC ↗
  • Who funds BETTY LOUS PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds CURE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA GUADALUPE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SERVICES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds KEYSTONE OPPORTUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT OF LEHIGH VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds UPPER BUCKS LIONS KIDNEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY BIKE WORKS ↗
  • Who funds Living the Dream Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT OF EASTON INC ↗
  • Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN CONGREGATIONAL SERVICES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of the Greater Lehigh ValleyPA27.9× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of the Greater Lehigh Valley · Lehigh Valley Community Foundation · Harry C Trexler Estate · Frederick H Bedford Jr & Margaret S Bedford Charitable Foundation · Ppl Foundation · Martin D Cohen Family Foundation · Martin Guitar Charitable Foundation · Air Products Foundation · William H and Patti a Lehr Foundation · Two Rivers Health & Wellness Foundation · Ross J Born and Wendy G Born Charitable Trust · The Century Fund Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Linden Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Linden Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Linden’s filings →

    More from the funding graph