· Private foundation
Two Rivers Health & Wellness Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 58% of TWO RIVERS HEALTH & WELLNESS FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k17 grants · $99k
- $10k–50k38 grants · $726k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST LUKES UNIVERSITY | $100,000 |
| KELLYN FOUNDATION | $49,400 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF LV | $45,500 |
| VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE | $40,892 |
| NEW BETHANY MINISTRIES | $39,500 |
| EASTON AREA COMMUNITY CENTER | $37,500 |
| PINEBOOK SERVICES FOR CHILDREN | $25,000 |
| GREATER EASTON DEVELOPMENT PARTNER | $25,000 |
| FAMILY CONNECTION | $25,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EASTON | $24,000 |
| METHOD SERVICES FOR CHILDREN | $20,040 |
| PROJECT OF EASTON | $20,000 |
| GREATER VALLEY YMCA - EASTON BRANCH | $20,000 |
| CHILDREN'S HOME OF EASTON | $20,000 |
| THIRD STREET ALLIANCE | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
60 repeat relationships — 51 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KFKELLYN FOUNDATION8× · 2018–2025 · $463k · revenue +90%
- SAST ANTHONY'S YOUTH CENTER OF EASTON PA INC8× · 2018–2025 · $290k · revenue +61%
- CBCOMMUNITY BIKE WORKS5× · 2021–2025 · $189k · revenue +84%
Funded once
- LSLUTHERAN SENIOR SERVICES EASTone grant, 2022 · $18k · revenue -40%
- SESUBURBAN EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICEone grant, 2019 · $15k
- CCCHILD CARE INFORMATION SERVICES INCone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -100%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization is a leading organization in northwestern pennsylvania for quality early care and education. the organization provides direct service as well as training and planning leadership for a wide georaphic region.
To collect information from consumers and families of individuals in the mental health care system and report on their level of satisfaction with these services, in order to achieve a better understanding of how to serve these individuals…
To help individuals and families lead healthy and fulfilling lives.
The mission of the family health council of central pennsylvania, inc. (fhccp) is to build and support community-based health networks through partnerships, education, advocacy, and effective resource allocation.
The child development council of northeastern pa, inc. was established to provide child care and nutritional services to working families.
Bethanna is a christian non-profit social service organization providing services to children and families in philadelphia, southeastern and central pennsylvania. founded as a bible and missionary organization, bethanna whose name means…
To provide every child with affectionate and personalized care in a safe environment. we focus on providing for the physical, social, emotional, and cognitive development needs of children in an age-appropriate manner.
Berks counseling center (bcc) is a recovery oriented certified community behavioral health center (ccbhc) with an integrated behavioral and physical health model of service delivery. the center provides a holistic approach to a culturally…
Our mission is to witness to god's love, known in jesus christ, by empowering our patients through community centered, whole person quality health care for all, which includes those who are uninsured, underinsured, and underserved.
To deliver quality counseling programs and support services that empower individuals and families to improve their lives. the center provided counseling and support services to over 3,000 people in the areas of behavioral health services,…
Elwyn makes life better for people with developmental and behavioral health challenges.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Home of Easton Inc and the most unlike its peers is Operation Warm Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 95 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KELLYN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EASTON INC ↗
- Who funds ST ANTHONY'S YOUTH CENTER OF EASTON PA INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY BIKE WORKS ↗
- Who funds NEW BETHANY INC ↗
- Who funds Greater Easton Development Partnership ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME OF EASTON INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR HUMANISTIC CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds EQUI-LIBRIUM INC ↗
- Who funds TURNING POINT OF LEHIGH VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds RECOVERY REVOLUTION INC ↗
- Who funds SLATER FAMILY NETWORK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT OF EASTON INC ↗
- Who funds MINSI TRAILS COUNCIL #502 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds BETHLEHEM EMERGENCY SHELTERING INC ↗
- Who funds SHANTHI PROJECT ↗
- Who funds FAMILIES FIRST INC ↗
- Who funds SIGHTS FOR HOPE ↗
- Who funds HISPANIC CENTER LEHIGH VALLEY ↗
- Who funds LEHIGH VALLEY CHILDREN'S CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds THE NURTURE NATURE CENTER ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of the Greater Lehigh Valley · Lehigh Valley Community Foundation · Air Products Foundation · John a and Margaret Post Foundation · Sylvia Perkin Perpetual Charitable Trust · Ross J Born and Wendy G Born Charitable Trust · Ppl Foundation · Frederick H Bedford Jr & Margaret S Bedford Charitable Foundation · The Brown-Daub Foundation · Martin D Cohen Family Foundation · Harry C Trexler Estate · Shaffer Family Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Two Rivers Health & Wellness Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Two Rivers Health & Wellness Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Two Rivers Health & Wellness Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.