Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Linden Arts Fund For Children Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$91kEducation$19kHousing & Shelter$2k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$146k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EXPLORING THE ARTS$2,500
OPPORTUNITY MUSIC PROJECT$2,500
ATLANTIC THEATER COMPANY$2,500
CREATIVE ARTS WORKSHOP$2,500
MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB$2,500
ARTS FOR ALL$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOMEN IN NEED: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$103k · 11 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
3

Total granted

$103k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+52%

Still filing today

73%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AT
    ATLANTIC THEATER COMPANY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $19k · revenue +51%
  • AF
    ARTS FOR ALL INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $13k · revenue +63%
  • AA
    ALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $8k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • TH
    THE HARMONY PROGRAM INC
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +13%
  • WOMEN IN NEED INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +127%
  • HM
    HECKSCHER MUSEUMgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $500 · revenue +52%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Wharton Institute for the Performing Arts Inc

To offer accessible, high-quality performing arts education that sparks personal growth and builds inclusive communities. its vision is to transform performing arts education in an inclusive community accessible to all.

2
Manhattan School of Music

Manhattan school of music is deeply committed to excellence in education, performance, and creative activity; to the humanity of the school's environment; and to the cultural enrichment of the larger community. a premiere international…

Arts & Culture
3
Learning Through an Expanded Arts Program Inc

Learning through an expanded arts program, inc's (leap) mission is to provide educational arts programs to promote access and equity for new york city students underserved in the arts. we inspire diverse school communities to love learning…

Education
4
Studio in a School Association Inc

From classrooms to careers, studio in a school expands access to visual arts education and professions in the arts by partnering with practicing artists, schools, and cultural institutions.

5
The Diller-Quaile School of Music Inc

For more than a century, diller-quaile has offered an environment where music can flourish in all its aspects, enriching the lives of students of all ages and cultural backgrounds. the belief that music is a fundamental part of human life…

Arts & Culture
6
Bloomingdale School of Music

To provide access to high-quality music education for anyone who seeks it, regardless of economic status, ability level, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or religious affiliation.

Arts & Culture
7
Society of the Third Street Music School Settlement

The mission of third street music school settlement is to provide access to music and dance education to new yorkers of all ages.

Arts & Culture
8
Amda Inc (American Musical and Dramatic Academy)

Amda is committed to providing an unsurpassed performing arts education to a diverse community of creative artists. amda seeks to be both the school and the stage, where students are given the support and the freedom to find their voice…

9
Move(Nyc) Foundation Inc

Move|nyc| is a civic arts and social justice organization committed to cultivating a more diverse and inclusive society through transforming the field of professional dance. more than an arts organization, move|nyc| is a movement for…

Public Benefit
10
The Institute of Music for Children Inc

To engage children and youth in artistic expression and the creative process.

Arts & Culture
11
The Brooklyn Queens Conservatory of Music

The mission of the brooklyn conservatory of music is to transformlives and build community through the expressive, educational andtherapeutic powers of music.

Arts & Culture
12
National Dance Institute

The purposes of the corporation are to introduce and foster the arts into the experience, participation and knowledge of children using dance as a catalyst; promote the belief that the arts are primary and vital in our society and should…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arts for All Inc and the most unlike its peers is Women in Need Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ATLANTIC THEATER COMPANY — $19,000 · Arts & CultureATLANTIC THEATER COMPANYEXPLORING THE ARTS INC — $16,500 · Arts & CultureEXPLORING THE ARTS INCARTS FOR ALL INC — $13,000 · Arts & CultureARTS FOR ALL INCALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION INC — $8,000 · Arts & CultureALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION INCMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC — $5,000 · Arts & CultureMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INCELAINE KAUFMAN CULTURAL CENTER LUCY MOSES SCHOOL FOR MUSIC AND DANCE — $5,000 · Arts & CultureELAINE KAUFMAN CULTURAL CENTER LUCY MOSES SCHOOL FOR MUSIC AND DANCEART CREATES US INC — $4,500 · Arts & CultureART CREATES US INC+3 more — $5,000 · Arts & Culture+3 moreTHE CENTER FOR ARTS EDUCATION INC — $6,500 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR ARTS…WHEELS — $6,000 · OtherWHEELSIndividual grant recipient — $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant re…CREATIVE ARTS WORKSHOP — $2,500 · OtherCREATIVE ARTS WORKS…BROOME STREET ACADEMY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL — $15,100 · EducationBROOME STREET A…WOMEN IN NEED INC — $1,500 · Human Services
Arts & Culture$76,000Other$19,000Education$15,100Human Services$1,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetATLANTIC THEATER COMPANY — $19,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEXPLORING THE ARTS INC — $16,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetBROOME STREET ACADEMY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL — $15,100 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetARTS FOR ALL INC — $13,000 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION INC — $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR ARTS EDUCATION INC — $6,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetELAINE KAUFMAN CULTURAL CENTER LUCY MOSES SCHOOL FOR MUSIC AND DANCE — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetART CREATES US INC — $4,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE HARMONY PROGRAM INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN IN NEED INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHECKSCHER MUSEUM — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY13.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Milton and Sally Avery Arts Foundation · The Pierre & Tana Matisse Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Linden Arts Fund For Children Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Linden Arts Fund For Children Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Linden Arts Fund For Children Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph