· Private foundation
Linda Petro Ulrey & Laurence a Ulr Ulrey
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $4k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $27k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FIDELITY CHARITABLE DONATION | $27,000 |
| ANGELS PLACE | $2,000 |
| COREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION | $1,500 |
| MACKINAC CENTER | $500 |
| HOLY NAME CATHOLIC CHURCH | $100 |
| WOODSIDE BIBLE CHURCH | $50 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +147% since the first grant, against +73% for those funded once.
9 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- DADETROIT ATHLETIC CLUB FOUNDATION6× · 2017–2023 · $2k · revenue +162%
- MCMACKINAC CENTER3× · 2018–2025 · $800 · revenue +64%
- PFPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC2× · 2017–2018 · $200 · revenue +147%
Funded once
- CSCAPUCHIN SOUP KITCHENone grant, 2017 · $650
- MCMICHIGAN CONSERVATIVE COALITIONone grant, 2019 · $600
- DDDETROIT DOG RESCUEgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $500 · revenue +138%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.
There are many pathways for improving the lives of animals, but encouraging corporations to embed animal protection values into their production practices, supply chains, marketing efforts and research and development activities may be the…
Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…
World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…
Enhance the ability of actec members to provide the most efficient and highest quality services to their clients; develop qualified trust and estate counselors; improve and reform probate, trust and tax laws, procedures, and standards of…
Informing and educating the public and decision makers about environmental issues.
Spcala is dedicated to the prevention of cruelty to animals through education, law enforcement, intervention and advocacy.
The coalition to protect michigan resources's mission is to be a strong voice for the equitable co-management of michigan's fisheries, with both the great lakes and inland lakes and streams, to insure that conservation principles remain in…
The chamber is the voice for business and works to power the economy for southeast michigan through public policy, advocacy and leading regional economic development and talent initiatives.
Since 1944, the north shore animal league america's mission has been to save the lives of pets through adoption, rescue, education, medical care, spay/neuter and advocacy.
Gdahc mission: together with our partners, we empower and improve the health and economic vitality of individuals, organizations and communities by catalyzing the power of collaboration. gdahc vision: healthy people. healthy community.…
The mission of the alf is to advance the rule of law by advocating limited and efficient government, free enterprise, individual liberty, property rights, effective education, and the use of sound science in judicial and regulatory…
How this is measured
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ANGELS' PLACE ↗
- Who funds DETROIT ATHLETIC CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds MACKINAC CENTER ↗
- Who funds MICHIGAN CONSERVATIVE COALITION ↗
- Who funds DETROIT DOG RESCUE ↗
- Who funds Sigma Alpha Epsilon Foundation ↗
- Who funds Wreaths Across America ↗
- Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
- Who funds DETROIT ATHLETIC CLUB ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC ↗
- Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds Little Traverse Conservancy Inc ↗
- Who funds STANLEY M ISAACS NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Linda Petro Ulrey & Laurence a Ulr Ulrey funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Linda Petro Ulrey & Laurence a Ulr Ulrey. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Linda Petro Ulrey & Laurence a Ulr Ulrey’s filings →