Skip to content
Lillian Rogatz Memorial Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Lillian Rogatz Memorial Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$97kHuman Services$12kArts & Culture$5kFood & Nutrition$4kPublic Benefit$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kCivil Rights$3kInternational$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$125k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BNOS BAIS YAAKOV$1,000
US HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM$1,000
NAPA HUMANE SOCIETY$600
ACLU$500
ONE VOICE FIRE RELIEF FUND$500
ALDEA CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES$500
LAFD WILDFIRE EMERY FUND$500
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$500
INVISIBLE WOUNDS HOLISTIC CENTER$200
COMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY$200
GIRLS ON THE RUN NAPA-SOLANO CHAPTER$200
Individual grant recipient$200
IMMIGRATION INSTITUTE OF THE BAY AREA$200
IF GIVEN A CHANCE$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY: $2k → 9%COMMUNITY ACTION NAPA VALLEY: $250 → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%COMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY: $200 → 9%SHARE THE CARE NAPA VALLEY: $150 → 9%COMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY: $250 → 9%MOVING FORWARD TOWARD INDEPENDENCE: $250 → 9%MOLLY'S ANGELS: $250 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
NJ
CA
VA
AZ
NC
SC
DC
HI
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$105k · 15 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
41

Total granted

$105k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+11%

Still filing today

47%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesCivil RightsInternationalArts & CultureAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
    2× · 2024–2025 · $3k · revenue +15%
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY
    4× · 2017–2025 · $2k · revenue +104%
  • AF
    American Friends of Livnot ULehibanot
    2× · 2020–2023 · $1k · revenue +100%

Funded once

  • CK
    CONGREGATION KOL AMI
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • CK
    CONGREGATION KOL AMI
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • N
    NVCANDO
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
2
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
3
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
4
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc

To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…

Food & Nutrition
5
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

—
6
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
7
Mazon a Jewish Response to Hunger

Inspired by Jewish values and ideals, MAZON is a national advocacy organization working to end hunger among people of all faiths and backgrounds in the United States and Israel. See Schedule O for more details.

—
8
City Harvest Inc

To end hunger in communities throughout new york city. (see schedule o)to end hunger in communities throughout new york city. we do this through food rescue and distribution, education, and other practical, innovative solutions.

Food & Nutrition
9
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
10
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
11
Food Bank of the Albemarle

To fight hunger and poverty in northeastern north carolina.

Food & Nutrition
12
Extrafood

Food Rescue - The Organization rescues excess fresh food from Bay Area businesses, schools and non-profits and immediately delivers the food to safety net partners - such as senior housing centers, after-school programs, and homeless…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hawaii Foodbank Inc; the most unlike its peers is Moving Forward Towards Independence. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
21/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEMPLE EMANUEL: $84,141 · OtherTEMPLE EMANUELALDEA CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $7,725 · OtherALDEA CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICESCONGREGATION KOL AMI: $5,000 · OtherCONGREGATION KOL AMI: $5,000 · Other+33 more: $16,150 · Other+33 moreCOMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY: $2,200 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 · Human ServicesMoving Forward Towards Independence: $250 · Human ServicesMOLLYS ANGELS: $250 · Human ServicesShare the Care Napa Valley: $150 · Human ServicesThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $2,500 · Arts & CultureIMMIGRATION INSTITUTE OF THE BAY AREA: $700 · Arts & CultureJEWISH BOOK COUNCIL INC: $540 · Arts & CultureAmerican Friends of Livnot ULehibanot: $1,040 · InternationalWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $1,000 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $750 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $500 · InternationalMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $500 · Food & NutritionNAPA VALLEY CANDO: $500 · Food & NutritionFEEDING IT FORWARD INC: $500 · Food & NutritionMANNA FOOD BANK INC: $500 · Food & NutritionHAWAII FOODBANK INC: $500 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $250 · Food & NutritionGIFTS FROM THE HEART FOOD BANK: $250 · Food & NutritionTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $750 · Civil RightsNATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER: $500 · Civil RightsCENTER FOR VOTER INFORMATION: $500 · Civil RightsREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $100 · Civil RightsBNOS BAIS YAAKOV OF FAR ROCKAWAY: $1,000 · EducationIF GIVEN A CHANCE: $450 · Education
Other$118,016Human Services$3,850Arts & Culture$3,740International$3,290Food & Nutrition$3,000Civil Rights$1,850Education$1,450

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY: $2,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Livnot ULehibanot: $1,040 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBNOS BAIS YAAKOV OF FAR ROCKAWAY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIMMIGRATION INSTITUTE OF THE BAY AREA: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH BOOK COUNCIL INC: $540 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAPA VALLEY CANDO: $500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFEEDING IT FORWARD INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMANNA FOOD BANK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBELOVED ASHEVILLE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR VOTER INFORMATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII FOODBANK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Common Ground: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIF GIVEN A CHANCE: $450 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMoving Forward Towards Independence: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane Society of Napa County & SPCA INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOLLYS ANGELS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetShare the Care Napa Valley: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNRISE HORSE RESCUE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE STORY OF STUFF PROJECT: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Peter a & Vernice H G…Craig and Kathryn Hal…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Hands Across the Vall…Silicon Valley Commun…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…American Endowment Fo…American Online Givin…
Community Foundation of the Napa ValleyCA24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Napa Valley · Peter a & Vernice H Gasser Foundation · Craig and Kathryn Hall Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Hands Across the Valley Inc George Altamura Sr · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lillian Rogatz Memorial Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lillian Rogatz Memorial Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lillian Rogatz Memorial’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home