Skip to content

· Private foundation

Light the Candle Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$115kHealth$64kReligion$59kHuman Services$27kEnvironment$26kEducation$25kArts & Culture$22kFood & Nutrition$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $31k
$2,369
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VYO USA INC$11,000
Individual grant recipient$10,001
MARY MARTHA HOUSE$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
HINDU UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA$2,369
Individual grant recipient$1,252
MISSIONARIES OF CHARITY$1,008
TABERNACULO LA FE DE TAMPA$1,000
NEW LIFE MISSIONS$1,000
NEW HOPE BAPTIST CHURCH OF RUSK$1,000
FOUNDATION CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$1,000
CROWDFUND PEER-TO-PEER$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $101k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AIM FOR SEVA: $1k → 12%GIVE FOUNDATION INC: $100k → 8%BLUE MTN CENTER OF MEDITATION: $251 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CA
AR
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$187k · 17 repeat orgs$244k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
32

Total granted

$187k
$206k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+7%

Still filing today

24%
34%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    TAMPA GENERAL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2021 · $36k
  • MM
    MARY MARTHA HOUSE
    4× · 2021–2025 · $32k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2020–2022 · $21k

Funded once

  • GF
    GIVE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -102%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $11k
  • V
    VRAJ
    one grant, 2019 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Common Cause Education Fund

The common cause education fund employs research, outreach, educational programming, and coalition building to increase public understanding of how our democracy works, empower citizens to hold their government accountable, and promote…

Public Benefit
2
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
3
The American India Foundation

The american india foundation(aif) is a nonprofit american development organization that is devoted to accelerating social and economic change in india.

Public Safety & Disaster
4
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International
5
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
6
Creative Commons Corporation

Develops legal and technical infrastructure for digital creativity, sharing, and innovation.

Education
7
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
8
Sankara Eye Foundation Usa

To work towards eradicating curable blindness all over india. our key program is vision 20/20 - with the goal of performing 500,000 free surgeries per year throughout india. we have been primarily partnering with sankara eye foundation in…

Health
9
Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc

Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…

—
10
Just Capital Foundation Inc

Just capital's mission is to build a more just economy that works for all americans by helping companies improve how they serve all their stakeholders - workers, customers, communities, the environment, and shareholders - as defined by the…

Social Science
11
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
12
Citizens United Foundation

An educational organization, which conducts research, informs and educates the public on various national and international issues.

Unclassified
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hindu American Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Care Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
8/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TAMPA GENERAL FOUNDATION: $36,007 · OtherTAMPA GENERAL FOUNDATIONMARY MARTHA HOUSE: $31,500 · OtherMARY MARTHA HOUSEIndividual grant recipient: $20,912 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCO-SOLVE COLLECTIVE: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICINE & BIO SCIENCES: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $11,125 · OtherVYO USA INC: $11,000 · OtherVRAJ: $11,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,889 · OtherCARE FOUNDATION: $10,001 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,001 · OtherSHANTI ACADEMY: $10,000 · Other+33 more: $77,809 · Other+33 moreGIVE FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesGIVE FOUNDATION INC+2 more: $1,251 · Human ServicesTIDES FOUNDATION: $12,500 · PhilanthropyTHE CLEAR FUND: $6,500 · PhilanthropyHINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMON THREADS: $6,500 · Arts & CultureWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $7,000 · InternationalVoice for Children Inc AKA Voices for Children of Florida: $5,000 · Crime & LegalWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $3,000 · EducationFOUNDATION CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $1,000 · EducationCARE FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $601 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $250 · Health
Other$285,244Human Services$101,251Philanthropy$19,000Arts & Culture$18,500International$7,000Crime & Legal$5,000Education$4,000Health$3,351

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGIVE FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMONEYTHINK: $8,128 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEAR FUND: $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON THREADS: $6,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVoice for Children Inc AKA Voices for Children of Florida: $5,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetCOMMON CAUSE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHindu University of America: $2,369 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALL INDIA MOVEMENT FOR SEVA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $601 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK: $258 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE MOUNTAIN CENTER OF MEDITATION INC: $251 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GIVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MONEYTHINK ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEAR FUND ↗
  • Who funds COMMON THREADS ↗
  • Who funds Voice for Children Inc AKA Voices for Children of Florida ↗
  • Who funds COMMON CAUSE ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds CARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Hindu University of America ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC7.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Light the Candle Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Light the Candle Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Light the Candle’s filings →

More from the funding graph