Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Light the Candle Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$46k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$115kHealth$64kReligion$59kHuman Services$27kEnvironment$26kEducation$25kArts & Culture$22kFood & Nutrition$17kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARY MARTHA HOUSE$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CO SOLVE COLLECTIVE$10,000
VOICES FOR CHILDREN$5,000
HINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION$5,000
BLUE MT CENTER OF MEDI$1,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $101k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AIM FOR SEVA: $1k → 12%GIVE FOUNDATION INC: $100k → 8%BLUE MTN CENTER OF MEDITATION: $251 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CA
AR
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$158k · 14 repeat orgs$218k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
31

Total granted

$158k
$202k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+19%

Still filing today

29%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyEducationInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    TAMPA GENERAL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2021 · $36k
  • MM
    MARY MARTHA HOUSE
    3× · 2021–2024 · $22k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2020–2022 · $21k

Funded once

  • GF
    GIVE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -102%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $11k
  • V
    VRAJ
    one grant, 2019 · $11k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Common Cause Education Fund

The common cause education fund employs research, outreach, educational programming, and coalition building to increase public understanding of how our democracy works, empower citizens to hold their government accountable, and promote…

Public Benefit
2
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
3
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
4
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International
5
Creative Commons Corporation

Develops legal and technical infrastructure for digital creativity, sharing, and innovation.

Education
6
Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc

Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…

7
The American India Foundation

The american india foundation(aif) is a nonprofit american development organization that is devoted to accelerating social and economic change in india.

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Center for Democracy and Technology

Advocating for public policies that advance democratic values in the digital age.

Civil Rights
9
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
10
Commons Impact Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Color of Changeorg Education Fund

Color of change.org education fund exists to empower our members - black americans and our allies to make decision makers more responsive to the concerns of black americans and to bring about positive social change for everyone.

Civil Rights
12
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Central Kitchen Inc and the most unlike its peers is Care Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TAMPA GENERAL FOUNDATION — $36,007 · OtherTAMPA GENERAL FOUNDATIONMARY MARTHA HOUSE — $21,500 · OtherMARY MARTHA HOUSEIndividual grant recipient — $20,912 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICINE & BIO SCIENCES — $15,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICINE & BIO SCIENCESCO-SOLVE COLLECTIVE — $15,000 · OtherCO-SOLVE COLLECTIVEIndividual grant recipient — $11,125 · OtherVRAJ — $11,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $10,889 · OtherCARE FOUNDATION — $10,001 · OtherSHANTI ACADEMY — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherMONEYTHINK — $8,128 · Other+25 more — $51,802 · Other+25 moreGIVE FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesGIVE FOUNDATION INC+2 more — $1,251 · Human ServicesTIDES FOUNDATION — $12,500 · PhilanthropyTHE CLEAR FUND — $6,500 · PhilanthropyHINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC — $12,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMON THREADS — $6,500 · Arts & CultureWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $7,000 · InternationalVoice for Children Inc AKA Voices for Children of Florida — $5,000 · Crime & LegalCARE FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $601 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $250 · HealthWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC — $3,000 · Education
Other$231,364Human Services$101,251Philanthropy$19,000Arts & Culture$18,500International$7,000Crime & Legal$5,000Health$3,351Education$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGIVE FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC — $12,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMONEYTHINK — $8,128 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEAR FUND — $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON THREADS — $6,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVoice for Children Inc AKA Voices for Children of Florida — $5,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON CAUSE — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALL INDIA MOVEMENT FOR SEVA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $601 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK — $258 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE MOUNTAIN CENTER OF MEDITATION INC — $251 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GIVE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MONEYTHINK
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds THE CLEAR FUND
  • Who funds COMMON THREADS
  • Who funds Voice for Children Inc AKA Voices for Children of Florida
  • Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC
  • Who funds COMMON CAUSE
  • Who funds CARE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ALL INDIA MOVEMENT FOR SEVA INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC7.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Light the Candle Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 21%
  • Oregon Food Bank21% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph