Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lifestyle Management Inc

TO PROVIDE SHELTER FOR HOMELESS AND ABANDONED ANIMALS AND PROVIDE SERVICES TO HELP IN PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS.

$749k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$651k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Animals$2.5MEducation$299kPublic Safety & Disaster$8kHealth$8kYouth Development$4kArts & Culture$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
  • $250k+1 grant · $651k
$24,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SKYDANCE LLC$651,429
HENNESSEY HIGH SHCO0L$53,000
NEXUS EQUINE INC$24,500
VCA KICKINGBIRDANIMAL HOSPITAL$9,294
OKC POLICE FOUNDATION$8,085
ALLIED ARTS$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 13% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%ASKA'S ANIMALS FOUNDATION: $3k → 7%LONG BEACH GIVES: $3k → 14%MARLEY'S MUTTS ANIMAL RESCUE: $7k → 18%YUKON HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI: $3k → 9%BELLA SPCA: $330k → 12%HENNESSEY HIGH SCHOOL: $219k → 12%SMALL ANIMAL CLINIC OF TULSA: $2k → 15%ALLIED ARTS: $3k → 16%VET MEDICAL TEACHING HOSPITAL: $4k → 19%MARLEY'S MUTTS ANIMAL RESCUE: $3k → 18%Pet Angels Rescue Inc: $273k → 12%HENNESSEY HIGH SHCO0L: $53k → 12%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $3k → 16%Pet Angels Rescue Inc: $257k → 12%HENNESSEY HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 12%DOWN SYNDROM ASSOC OF CENTRAL OK: $800 → 16%BELLA SPCA: $35k → 12%HENNESSEY HIGH SCHOOL: $8k → 12%EMPOWEROKC: $3k → 16%SKYDANCE LLC: $360k → 12%WINGS: $3k → 16%SKYDANCE LLC: $300k → 12%WINGS: $1k → 16%SKYDANCE LLC: $300k → 12%BLAZE TRIBUTE EQUINE RESCUE: $16k → 16%BLAZE TRIBUTE EQUINE RESCUE: $5k → 16%VCA KICKINGBIRD ANIMAL HOSPITAL: $69k → 16%VCA KICKINGBIRD ANIMAL HOSPITAL: $59k → 16%PUPPY PAWS: $45k → 16%VCA KICKINGBIRD ANIMAL HOSPITAL: $37k → 16%PUPPY PAWS: $36k → 16%VCA KICKINGBIRDANIMAL HOSPITAL: $9k → 16%OLIVER & FRIENDS FARM SANCTUARY: $2k → 16%EXCLUSIVELY EQUINE VET SERVICES: $1k → 16%BLUE PEARL EMERGENCY PET HOSPITAL: $8k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.1M · 10 repeat orgs$97k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +79% since the first grant, against -9% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
11

Total granted

$3.1M
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
-9%

Still filing today

20%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $64k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’21’22’23’24
AnimalsArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    SKYDANCE LLC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $1.6M
  • PA
    PET ANGELS RESCUE INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $530k · revenue -82% · 51% of their budget
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2021–2022 · $365k

Funded once

  • BP
    BLUE PEARL EMERGENCY PET HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • VM
    VET MEDICAL TEACHING HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
  • TA
    The Aska's Animals Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +166%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Team Animal Rescue Inc

animal rescue and care

Animals
2
Shelters and Shelves Rescue Inc

foster based dog rescue working with shelters to save dogs

Animals
3
Boardwalk Pet Rescue

Pet rescue

Animals
4
Raskels Rescue
Animals
5
The Animal Rescue Alliance

It is the mission of The Animal Rescue Alliance to establish and maintain the ideals of Tara Nagel with regards to the treatment of homeless and unwanted animals. The all volunteer group is dedicated to the helping of homeless pets in the…

Animals
6
Bella View Farm Animal Sanctuary Inc
Animals
7
Animal Rescue and Adoption Agency Inc

An animal rescue/adoption Agency. Rescued animals are from kill shelters or owner surrenders facing hardship then rehabbed/medical completed while in foster care then adopted into loving homes.

Animals
8
Bella and Sunshine Rescue Inc

rescue abandoned dogs

Animals
9
Peppy Pet Rescue

rescue, rehabilitate, and rehome animals in need

Animals
10
Runaways Animal Rescue
Animals
11
Phelps County Animal Rescue

provide shelter and care for dogs and cats

Animals
12
Bella Vita Rescue Inc

To Dogs that have been abused, abandoned or in dire straights with Shelter. Bella Vita rescues, rehabilitates and place them in Forever Homes. Providing emergency surgeries and other medical care and supports Fosters who provide such care.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nexus Equine Inc; the most unlike its peers is Allied Arts of Oklahoma Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SKYDANCE LLC: $1,611,429 · OtherSKYDANCE LLCIndividual grant recipient: $364,988 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHENNESSEY HIGH SCHOOL: $237,200 · OtherHENNESSEY HIGH SCHOOLVCA KICKINGBIRD ANIMAL HOSPITAL: $174,203 · OtherVCA KICKINGBIRD ANIMAL HOSPITAL+13 more: $181,972 · Other+13 morePET ANGELS RESCUE INC: $530,052 · AnimalsPET ANGELS RESCUE INCNEXUS EQUINE INC: $51,432 · AnimalsNEXUS EQUINE INC+3 more: $25,467 · AnimalsALLIED ARTS OF OKLAHOMA INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureDown Syndrome Association of Central Oklahoma: $800 · Health
Other$2,569,792Animals$606,951Arts & Culture$2,500Health$800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPET ANGELS RESCUE INC: $530,052 over 4y, 51% of budgetNEXUS EQUINE INC: $51,432 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetBLAZE'S TRIBUTE EQUINE RESCUE INC: $20,027 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetThe Aska's Animals Foundation Inc: $3,440 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetALLIED ARTS OF OKLAHOMA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOliver and Friends Farm Sanctuary Incorporated: $2,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetDown Syndrome Association of Central Oklahoma: $800 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PET ANGELS RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEXUS EQUINE INC ↗
  • Who funds BLAZE'S TRIBUTE EQUINE RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Aska's Animals Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALLIED ARTS OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds Oliver and Friends Farm Sanctuary Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds Down Syndrome Association of Central Oklahoma ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kirkpatrick Foundation IncOK19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kirkpatrick Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lifestyle Management Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lifestyle Management Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lifestyle Management Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Lifestyle Management Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lifestyle Management’s filings →

    More from the funding graph