Skip to content
Liferay Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Liferay Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$587k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$550k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$2.4MInternational$1.1MHealth$1.0MCommunity Improvement$381kHuman Services$341kPhilanthropy$236kEducation$185kRecreation & Sports$97kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $600
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $36k
  • $250k+1 grant · $550k
$36,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL FINANCIAL SERVICES$550,000
GOOD SHEPHERD WORLD EVANGELISM$36,000
ONE COLLECTIVE (FORMERLY INTL TEAMS)$600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $88k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 40% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAM: $500 → 10%EL CAMINO HOMLESS ORGANIZATION: $500 → 12%LIVING WATER INTERNATIONAL: $3k → 8%UNBOUND: $150 → 16%HANDS FOR VIETNAM: $500 → 8%A PRECIOUS CHILD: $500 → 5%RAHAB'S DAUGHTERS: $21k → 6%SEEDS OF HOPE MINISTRIES: $500 → 12%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAM: $500 → 10%EL CAMINO HOMELESS ORGANIZATION: $500 → 12%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $500 → 14%HANDS FOR VIETNAM: $500 → 8%NEW LIFE FURNITURE INC: $500 → 16%RAHAB'S DAUGHTERS: $7k → 6%JUBILEE ASSOCIATION OF MARYLAND: $500 → 8%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAM: $100 → 10%EL CAMINO HOMLESS ORGANIZATION: $500 → 12%RAHAB'S DAUGHTERS: $5k → 6%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $500 → 14%THE ARCHIBALD PROJECT: $500 → 10%RAHAB'S DAUGHTERS: $5k → 6%HOPE'S CLOSET: $1k → 12%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $25 → 14%SPEAK YOUR TRUTH TODAY: $5k → 10%SPEAK YOUR TRUTH TODAY: $2k → 10%RAHAB'S DAUGHTERS: $7k → 14%RAHAB'S DAUGHTERS: $6k → 14%RAHAB'S DAUGHTERS: $5k → 14%INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF LOS ANGELES: $500 → 14%SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN: $500 → 14%VENICE PARENTS DAYCARE & PRESCHOOL: $5k → 14%THE INNOCENCE PROJECT: $500 → 17%CLARIS HEALTH: $200 → 14%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF LOS ANGELES: $500 → 14%ASIAN YOUTH CENTER: $500 → 14%ASIAN YOUTH CENTER: $500 → 14%ASIAN YOUTH CENTER: $500 → 14%INTERNATIONAL SANCTUARY: $1k → 10%ASIAN YOUTH CENTER: $500 → 14%UNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICE: $1k → 14%BEAUTY2THESTREETZ: $500 → 14%A STABLE PLACE: $500 → 14%MARY'S SHELTER: $500 → 10%OC UNITED: $500 → 10%OC UNITED: $500 → 10%MCPHERSON EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $250 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.7M · 104 repeat orgs$2.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

104 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 101 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

104
215

Total granted

$3.7M
$2.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+27%

Still filing today

72%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalHealthReligionEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST
    STAND TO REASON
    4× · 2017–2021 · $350k · revenue +65%
  • CF
    CHOC FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $328k · revenue +103%
  • OC
    OLIVE CREST
    6× · 2017–2022 · $252k · revenue +158%

Funded once

  • YF
    YOUNG FAMILY FUND - FIDELITY CHARITABLE
    one grant, 2020 · $394k
  • HP
    HOPE PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue +83%
  • BA
    BRIAN AND CARIS CHAN FAMILY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $225k · revenue -98% · 37% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Hope International Inc

The purpose of world hope international, inc. (whi) includes providing assistance to economically disadvantaged people through long-term social transformation projects, including anti-trafficking protection, clean water, economic…

International
2
Food for the Hungry Inc

Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…

International
3
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
4
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
5
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
6
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
7
Zoe Empowers

Zoe Empowers is a global network of local organizations throughout Africa and India providing a replicable and scalable framework whereby youth led or resourced families are provided the training, resources, and community support to become…

International
8
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
9
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
10
International Needs

International needs has the vision to transform lives and change communities by helping christian nationals serve both god and neighbor within their own countries.

—
11
Intrahealth International Inc

Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.

Health
12
Global Partners in Care

The organization's mission is to build partnerships to enhance compassionate care globally. we are dedicated to improving access to hospice and palliative care worldwide.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Action Against Hunger - Usa; the most unlike its peers is The Barnabas Group Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

213 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 213 of the 322 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
45
Early backer (in before they grew)
206/213
Grantees still filing
149/213
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL FINANCIAL SERVICES: $679,403 · OtherNATIONAL FINANCIAL SERVICESYOUNG FAMILY FUND - FIDELITY CHARITABLE: $394,200 · OtherYOUNG FAMILY FUND - FIDELITY CHARITABLEIndividual grant recipient: $358,544 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHOPE PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL INC: $250,000 · OtherHOPE PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL INCIndividual grant recipient: $225,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF DIAMOND BAR: $200,000 · OtherEVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF DIAMOND BARGOSPEL FUND: $180,000 · OtherGOSPEL FUNDGOOD SHEPHERD WORLD EVANGELISM: $135,000 · Other+110 more: $731,522 · Other+110 moreSTAND TO REASON: $350,000 · ReligionSTAND TO REASONBRIAN AND CARIS CHAN FAMILY FOUNDATION: $224,825 · ReligionBRIAN AND CARIS CHAN FAMILY …STRATEGIC RESOURCE GROUP INC: $200,000 · ReligionSTRATEGIC RESOURCE GROUP INCZOE INTERNATIONAL: $176,764 · ReligionZOE INTERNATIONALFRIENDS OF ADVENTURE IN MISSIONS INC: $144,200 · ReligionFRIENDS OF ADVENTURE IN MISS…DESIRING GOD MINISTRIES: $125,000 · ReligionDESIRING GOD MINISTRIESMUSTARD SEED NETWORK: $75,000 · ReligionThe Barnabas Group Ltd: $60,000 · Religion+9 more: $152,483 · Religion+9 moreCHOC FOUNDATION: $327,750 · HealthCHOC FOUNDA…OLIVE CREST: $252,400 · HealthOLIVE CREST+12 more: $34,750 · Health+12 moreMANAS DEVELOPMENT GROUP: $248,447 · InternationalREAH INTERNATIONAL INC: $15,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $14,100 · InternationalPHILIP HAYDEN FOUNDATION INC: $12,633 · International+18 more: $37,217 · InternationalUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $100,000 · EducationSOLIDARITY: $35,350 · EducationPOMONA HOPE: $11,000 · Education+4 more: $5,823 · EducationRahab's Daughters: $56,589 · Human ServicesHOPE HARVEST INTERNATIONAL: $37,000 · Human ServicesSPEAK YOUR TRUTH TODAY: $6,479 · Human ServicesVENICE PARENTS DAYCARE AND PRESCHOOL DBA DIG CHILDHOOD CENTER: $5,000 · Human Services+16 more: $16,125 · Human ServicesSf-Shanghai Association: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsTOGETHER WE RISE: $8,160 · Recreation & Sports
Other$3,153,669Religion$1,508,272Health$614,900International$327,397Education$152,173Human Services$121,193Recreation & Sports$58,160

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTAND TO REASON: $350,000 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetCHOC FOUNDATION: $327,750 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetOLIVE CREST: $252,400 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL INC: $250,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetMANAS DEVELOPMENT GROUP: $248,447 over 2y, 21% of budgetBRIAN AND CARIS CHAN FAMILY FOUNDATION: $224,825 over 1y, 37% of budgetSTRATEGIC RESOURCE GROUP INC: $200,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetZOE INTERNATIONAL: $176,764 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF ADVENTURE IN MISSIONS INC: $144,200 over 6y, 55% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD WORLD EVANGELISM: $135,000 over 4y, 43% of budgetDESIRING GOD MINISTRIES: $125,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMUSTARD SEED NETWORK: $75,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetRahab's Daughters: $56,589 over 6y, 10% of budgetSf-Shanghai Association: $50,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetTraining Leaders International: $47,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHISPANIC MINISTRY CENTER: $44,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetHOPE HARVEST INTERNATIONAL: $37,000 over 3y, 32% of budgetSOLIDARITY: $35,350 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $16,383 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWhittier Pregnancy Care Clinic: $15,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetREAH INTERNATIONAL INC: $15,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $14,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMIO Frontiers: $13,025 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHAI WORD: $13,000 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetRedeemer City To City: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPHILIP HAYDEN FOUNDATION INC: $12,633 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $11,182 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPOMONA HOPE: $11,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetIntegra Ventures Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetINSTITUTE ON RELIGION & DEMOCRACY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGIVE2ASIA: $9,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOGETHER WE RISE: $8,160 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSPEAK YOUR TRUTH TODAY: $6,479 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER LOS ANGELES: $6,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HAMILTON OHIO: $6,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetHOPE FOR THE DAY: $5,350 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetEquipping Restoring and Multiplying Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetVENICE PARENTS DAYCARE AND PRESCHOOL DBA DIG CHILDHOOD CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELPLIVE INC: $4,960 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $4,660 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSANFORD CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $4,600 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCHERITH CHRISTIAN PRIVATE FOUNDATION: $4,320 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetONE COLLECTIVE: $4,100 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Jazz Philharmonic: $3,750 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetIMMIGRANT FAMILIES TOGETHER FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLiving Water International: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STAND TO REASON ↗
  • Who funds CHOC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OLIVE CREST ↗
  • Who funds HOPE PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MANAS DEVELOPMENT GROUP ↗
  • Who funds BRIAN AND CARIS CHAN FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STRATEGIC RESOURCE GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds ZOE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ADVENTURE IN MISSIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD WORLD EVANGELISM ↗
  • Who funds DESIRING GOD MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSTARD SEED NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds The Barnabas Group Ltd ↗
  • Who funds Rahab's Daughters ↗
  • Who funds Sf-Shanghai Association ↗
  • Who funds Training Leaders International ↗
  • Who funds HISPANIC MINISTRY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HARVEST INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds SOLIDARITY ↗
  • Who funds RED BASKET INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Communi…Banc of California Ch…Brian and Caris Chan …Giving UniversityChristian Community F…O L Halsell FoundationServant FoundationCathay Bank FoundationSisters of St Joseph …Farmers & Merchants B…Tyndale House Ministr…The Signatry Charitab…
Orange County Community FoundationCA22.8× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Banc of California Charitable Foundation · Brian and Caris Chan Family Foundation · Giving University · Christian Community Foundation Inc · O L Halsell Foundation · Servant Foundation · Cathay Bank Foundation · Sisters of St Joseph Healthcare Foundation · Farmers & Merchants Bank Foundation · Tyndale House Ministries · The Signatry Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Liferay Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Liferay Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals: 67% of income from government
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Int'l Orthodox Christian Charities Inc: 7% of income from government
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Bethlehem Inn: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
40report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Liferay Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Liferay Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 322 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Liferay’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home