How much did LIEBERGESELL FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2023?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 57% of LIEBERGESELL FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

education

2020

—

2021

—

2022

—

2023

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

Under $10k11 grants · $25k
$10k–50k1 grant · $20k

$2,750

Median grant

States reached

Total assets

Largest grants

WEST POINT ASSOCIATION OF GRADUATES$20,000
ANTHONY LACIURA FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS$3,000
CLASSIC LYRIC ARTS$3,000
OPERA INDEX$3,000
PREMIER OPERA FOUNDATION$3,000
METROPOLITAN OPERA GUILD INC$2,750
DARIEN VFW POST 6933$2,461
ACTION FOR ARTISTS$2,000
AARON'S PRESENTS$2,000
MUSICA SACRA$2,000
DANIEL FERRO VOCAL PROGRAM INC$1,000
NEW OPERA AND MUSICAL THEATER$1,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 15%. 47% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$117k · 11 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against -23% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$117k

$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%

-23%

Still filing today

73%

42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureEducationInternationalFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

OI
OPERA INDEX
4× · 2018–2023 · $13k · revenue +516%
CL
CLASSIC LYRIC ARTS
4× · 2018–2023 · $12k · revenue +160%
EB
ELYSIUM BETWEEN TWO CONTINENTS
3× · 2018–2020 · $8k · revenue +19%

Funded once

RA
REMI ARTS INC
one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue -100%
CN
CAMERATA NEW YORK
one grant, 2018 · $3k
CM
CHAMBER MUSIC INSTITUTE FOR YOUNG MUSICIANS
one grant, 2018 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Foundation for Modern Opera

—

Opera At Florham Inc

Opera at Florham's mission is to make opera accessible and affordable to all, educate the public about opera, and support young opera singers

Arts & Culture

New York Chinese Opera Society Inc

The mission of the new york chinese opera society is to catalyze the promotion and artistic development of chinese culture and opera and create opportunities for enjoyment, understanding and appreciation by all people.

Arts & Culture

Teatro Grattacielo Inc

Teatro grattacielo promotes the rich tradition of opera by revitalizing lesser-known works, commissioning new operas, and supporting emerging artists.

Arts & Culture

Bronx Opera Company Inc

Performance of opera in fully-staged productions with orchestra and in concert

Arts & Culture

New York Concert Artists Associates Inc

To enhance and promote musical performances of all kinds of ensembles such as orchestras, chamber ensembles, and solo recitals by providing a variety of performance opportunities and personal networks to members of musicians in new york so…

Arts & Culture

San Francisco Opera Association

The world-renowned san francisco opera is considered one of the most important operatic organizations in the united states. great singing, outstanding conducting and productions sensitive to the music are core values of the opera. the…

Arts & Culture

The Opera Foundation Inc

Program for American Artists to train and perform in premier opera houses in Europe, and to support tours of European Opera Houses in the United States.

Arts & Culture

New York Opera Society Inc

Nyos is an educational and touring company dedicated to the promotion of classical music through relevant and accessible productions for domestic and international audiences

Arts & Culture

The Rome Chamber Music Festival Inc

The Rome Chamber Music Festival, Inc. is a New York not-for-profit corporation established to promote and advance the public perception and awareness of music in its cultural environment by organizing and promoting concerts and musical…

Arts & Culture

On Site Opera Inc

On Site Operas mission is to:produce site-specific productions in venues throughout New York Cityenrich the cultural life of New York by bringing opera to new audiences who otherwise may not have the opportunity to experience this type of…

—

Syracuse Opera Company Inc

Production of professional opera performances

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Foundation for the Arts Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Enrico Caruso Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

14/15

Grantees still filing

9/15

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$81,361Arts & Culture$45,750International$8,000Education$8,000Food & Nutrition$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation LIEBERGESELL FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

4get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: OPERA INDEX.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~54 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 6.2× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 133098404 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on OPERA INDEX, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 54 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 6% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Liebergesell Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Liebergesell Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

LIEBERGESELL FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Liebergesell Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

LIEBERGESELL FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Liebergesell Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph